Advanced Search

Review: An Alarming Public Health Problem: Ticks and Tick-Borne Pathogens in Urban Recreational Parks

View author affiliations
  • Abstract

    Ticks function as critical vectors for a wide range of pathogens that pose significant risks to both human and animal health. In recent years, the number and diversity of tick-borne pathogens have increased at an unprecedented rate, elevating tick-borne diseases (TBDs) to a major public health concern on a global scale. TBDs present a dual challenge, not only affecting human populations but also causing substantial economic losses in livestock industries across the world. The geographic distribution of many TBDs is shifting, with emerging, re-emerging, and resurging cases influenced by environmental factors such as deforestation and climate change. In China, rapid urbanization and concurrent improvements in urban ecological conditions have contributed to the expansion of tick habitats and increased human exposure to tick populations. Recent research warns that ticks and their associated pathogens present significant risks in urban environments, particularly in locations such as parks, playgrounds, and zoos. Despite these threats, public awareness of tick-borne diseases remains critically low. This review consolidates current knowledge on tick species and tick-borne pathogens found in urban parks and proposes strategic control measures to inform effective tick management policies both in China and globally.

  • loading...
  • Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest.
  • Funding: Supported by the Clinical Research Special Project in Health Profession of Shanghai (202240331) and The Sixth Round of Three-Year Public Health Action Plan of Shanghai (No. GWⅥ-11.1-13)
  • [1] Parola P. Tick-borne rickettsial diseases: emerging risks in Europe. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 2004;27(5):297 − 304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cimid.2004.03.006.
    [2] Dantas-Torres F, Chomel BB, Otranto D. Ticks and tick-borne diseases: a One Health perspective. Trends Parasitol 2012;28(10):437 − 46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2012.07.003.
    [3] Zhang YK, Zhang XY, Liu JZ. Ticks (Acari: Ixodoidea) in China: geographical distribution, host diversity, and specificity. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 2019;102(3):e21544. https://doi.org/10.1002/arch.21544.
    [4] Coutts C, Hahn M. Green infrastructure, ecosystem services, and human health. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2015;12(8):9768 − 98. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120809768.
    [5] Kolomiiets V, Rakowska P, Rymaszewska A. New problems of environmental ecology: ticks and tick-borne pathogens in city parks of Ukraine. Environ Microbiol Rep 2022;14(4):591 − 4. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-2229.13075.
    [6] Combs MA, Kache PA, VanAcker MC, Gregory N, Plimpton LD, Tufts DM, et al. Socio-ecological drivers of multiple zoonotic hazards in highly urbanized cities. Glob Chang Biol 2022;28(5):1705 − 24. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16033.
    [7] Mackenstedt U, Jenkins D, Romig T. The role of wildlife in the transmission of parasitic zoonoses in peri-urban and urban areas. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl 2015;4(1):71 − 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijppaw.2015.01.006.
    [8] Medlock JM, Hansford KM, Bormane A, Derdakova M, Estrada-Peña A, George JC, et al. Driving forces for changes in geographical distribution of Ixodes ricinus ticks in Europe. Parasit Vectors 2013;6:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-6-1.
    [9] Hansford KM, Wheeler BW, Tschirren B, Medlock JM. Questing Ixodes ricinus ticks and Borrelia spp. in urban green space across Europe: a review. Zoonoses Public Health 2022;69(3):153 − 66. https://doi.org/10.1111/zph.12913.
    [10] Skuballa J, Petney T, Pfäffle M, Oehme R, Hartelt K, Fingerle V, et al. Occurrence of different Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato genospecies including B. afzelii, B. bavariensis, and B. spielmanii in hedgehogs (Erinaceus spp.) in Europe. Ticks Tick Borne Dis 2012;3(1):8 − 13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2011.09.008.
    [11] Stewart PE, Bloom ME. Sharing the ride: Ixodes scapularis symbionts and their interactions. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2020;10:142. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2020.00142.
    [12] Mathews-Martin L, Namèche M, Vourc'h G, Gasser S, Lebert I, Poux V, et al. Questing tick abundance in urban and peri-urban parks in the French city of Lyon. Parasit Vectors 2020;13(1):576. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-04451-1.
    [13] Cheng ML, Su T, Eremeeva M, Hu R. Species composition, seasonal abundance, pathogen detection in ticks collected in southwestern San Bernardino County, California. In: Proceedings of the 79th annual meeting of mosquito and vector control association of California. Indian Wells, California, USA. 2011.
    [14] Pakanen VM, Sormunen JJ, Sippola E, Blomqvist D, Kallio ER. Questing abundance of adult taiga ticks Ixodes persulcatus and their Borrelia prevalence at the north-western part of their distribution. Parasit Vectors 2020;13(1):384. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-04259-z.
    [15] Romanenko V, Leonovich S. Long-term monitoring and population dynamics of ixodid ticks in Tomsk city (Western Siberia). Exp Appl Acarol 2015;66(1):103 − 18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-015-9879-2.
    [16] Matuschka FR, Richter D, Fischer P, Spielman A. Nocturnal detachment of the tick Ixodes hexagonus from nocturnally active hosts. Med Vet Entomol 1990;4(4):415 − 20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2915.1990.tb00459.x.
    [17] Dziemian S, Michalik J, Pi Łacińska B, Bialik S, Sikora B, Zwolak R. Infestation of urban populations of the Northern white-breasted hedgehog, Erinaceus roumanicus, by Ixodes spp. ticks in Poland. Med Vet Entomol 2014;28(4):465 − 9. https://doi.org/10.1111/mve.12065.
    [18] Jahfari S, Ruyts SC, Frazer-Mendelewska E, Jaarsma R, Verheyen K, Sprong H. Melting pot of tick-borne zoonoses: the European hedgehog contributes to the maintenance of various tick-borne diseases in natural cycles urban and suburban areas. Parasit Vectors 2017;10(1):134. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-017-2065-0.
    [19] Rubel F, Dautel H, Nijhof AM, Kahl O. Ticks in the metropolitan area of Berlin, Germany. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis 2022;13(6):102029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2022.102029.
    [20] Nwanade CF, Wang M, Li SS, Yu ZJ, Liu JZ. The current strategies and underlying mechanisms in the control of the vector tick, Haemaphysalis longicornis: implications for future integrated management. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis 2022;13(2):101905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2022.101905.
    [21] Chong ST, Kim HC, Lee IY, Kollars TM Jr, Sancho AR, Sames WJ, et al. Comparison of dragging and sweeping methods for collecting ticks and determining their seasonal distributions for various habitats, Gyeonggi Province, Republic of Korea. J Med Entomol 2013;50(3):611 − 8. https://doi.org/10.1603/ME12032.
    [22] Zheng HY, Yu ZJ, Zhou LF, Yang XL, Liu JZ. Seasonal abundance and activity of the hard tick Haemaphysalis longicornis (Acari: Ixodidae) in North China. Exp Appl Acarol 2012;56(2):133 − 41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-011-9505-x.
    [23] Qi Y, Ai LL, Jiao J, Wang JH, Wu DP, Wang PC, et al. High prevalence of Rickettsia spp. in ticks from wild hedgehogs rather than domestic bovine in Jiangsu province, Eastern China. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2022;12:954785. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2022.954785.
    [24] Iwakami S, Ichikawa Y, Inokuma H. A nationwide survey of ixodid tick species recovered from domestic dogs and cats in Japan in 2011. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis 2014;5(6):771 − 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2014.05.008.
    [25] Kim HG, Jung M, Lee DH. Seasonal activity of Haemaphysalis longicornis and Haemaphysalis flava (Acari: Ixodida), vectors of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome (SFTS) virus, and their SFTS virus harboring rates in Gyeonggi Province, South Korea. Exp Appl Acarol 2022;87(1):97 − 108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-022-00722-x.
    [26] Zeng WB, Li ZQ, Jiang TG, Cheng DH, Yang LM, Hang T, et al. Identification of bacterial communities and tick-borne pathogens in Haemaphysalis spp. collected from Shanghai, China. Trop Med Infect Dis 2022;7(12):413. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed7120413.
    [27] Shimada Y, Beppu T, Inokuma H, Okuda M, Onishi T. Ixodid tick species recovered from domestic dogs in Japan. Med Vet Entomol 2003;17(1):38 − 45. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2915.2003.00403.x.
    [28] McClung KL, Little SE. Amblyomma americanum (Lone star tick). Trends Parasitol 2023;39(1):70 − 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2022.10.005.
    [29] Small M, Brennan RE. Detection of Rickettsia amblyommatis and Ehrlichia chaffeensis in Amblyomma americanum inhabiting two urban parks in Oklahoma. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis 2021;21(5):385 − 7. https://doi.org/10.1089/vbz.2020.2755.
    [30] Zając Z, Bartosik K, Woźniak A. Monitoring Dermacentor reticulatus host-seeking activity in natural conditions. Insects 2020;11(5):264. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11050264.
    [31] Duscher GG, Feiler A, Leschnik M, Joachim A. Seasonal and spatial distribution of ixodid tick species feeding on naturally infested dogs from Eastern Austria and the influence of acaricides/repellents on these parameters. Parasit Vectors 2013;6:76. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-6-76.
    [32] Olivieri E, Gazzonis AL, Zanzani SA, Veronesi F, Manfredi MT. Seasonal dynamics of adult Dermacentor reticulatus in a peri-urban park in southern Europe. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis 2017;8(5):772 − 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2017.06.002.
    [33] MacDonald AJ. Abiotic and habitat drivers of tick vector abundance, diversity, phenology and human encounter risk in southern California. PLoS One 2018;13(7):e0201665. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201665.
    [34] Paddock CD, Zambrano ML, Clover JR, Ladd-Wilson S, Dykstra EA, Salamone A, et al. Rickettsia species identified in adult, host-seeking Dermacentor occidentalis (Acari: Ixodidae) from Baja California, Mexico, and Oregon and Washington, United States. J Med Entomol 2024;61(3):781 − 90. https://doi.org/10.1093/jme/tjae023.
    [35] Myers S, Duncan K. Dermacentor variabilis (American dog tick). Trends Parasitol 2024;40(3):273 − 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2024.01.001.
    [36] Noden BH, Roselli MA, Loss SR. Factors influencing abundance of 3 tick species across a gradient of urban development intensity in the US Great Plains. J Med Entomol 2024;61(1):233 − 44. https://doi.org/10.1093/jme/tjad132.
    [37] Blanton LS, Walker DH, Bouyer DH. Rickettsiae and ehrlichiae within a city park: is the urban dweller at risk? Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 2014;14(2):168-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/vbz.2013.1473.
    [38] Noden BH, Loss SR, Maichak C, Williams F. Risk of encountering ticks and tick-borne pathogens in a rapidly growing metropolitan area in the U. S. Great Plains. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis 2017;8(1):119 − 24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2016.10.007.
    [39] Dantas-Torres F, Otranto D. Rhipicephalus sanguineus (Brown dog tick). Trends Parasitol 2022;38(11):993 − 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2022.08.011.
    [40] Szabó MP, Pinter A, Labruna MB. Ecology, biology and distribution of spotted-fever tick vectors in Brazil. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2013;3:27. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2013.00027.
    [41] Zazueta OE, Armstrong PA, Márquez-Elguea A, Hernández Milán NS, Peterson AE, Ovalle-Marroquín DF, et al. Rocky mountain spotted fever in a large metropolitan center, Mexico-United States border, 2009-2019. Emerg Infect Dis 2021;27(6):1567 − 76. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2706.191662.
    [42] van Wyk CL, Mtshali K, Taioe MO, Terera S, Bakkes D, Ramatla T, et al. Detection of ticks and tick-borne pathogens of urban stray dogs in South Africa. Pathogens 2022;11(8):862. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11080862.
    [43] Muñoz-Leal S, Lopes MG, Marcili A, Martins TF, González-Acuña D, Labruna MB. Anaplasmataceae, Borrelia and Hepatozoon agents in ticks (Acari: Argasidae, Ixodidae) from Chile. Acta Trop 2019;192:91 − 103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2019.02.002.
    [44] Mans BJ, Gothe R, Neitz AWH. Biochemical perspectives on paralysis and other forms of toxicoses caused by ticks. Parasitology 2004;129 Suppl:S95-111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0031182003004670.
    [45] Llanos-Soto S, Muñoz-Leal S, Gatica JL, Misad C, González-Acuña D. Human toxicosis caused by the tick Ornithodoros spheniscus in a Chilean national park. Travel Med Infect Dis 2020;37:101811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101811.
    [46] Donaldson TG, Pèrez de León AA, Li AI, Castro-Arellano I, Wozniak E, Boyle WK, et al. Assessment of the geographic distribution of Ornithodoros turicata (argasidae): climate variation and host diversity. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2016;10(2):e0004383. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0004383.
    [47] Barraza-Guerrero SI, Meza-Herrera CA, García-De la Peña C, González-Álvarez VH, Vaca-Paniagua F, Díaz-Velásquez CE, et al. General microbiota of the soft tick Ornithodoros turicata parasitizing the bolson tortoise (Gopherus flavomarginatus) in the Mapimi biosphere reserve, Mexico. Biology (Basel) 2020;9(9):275. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology9090275.
    [48] Bissett JD, Ledet S, Krishnavajhala A, Armstrong BA, Klioueva A, Sexton C, et al. Detection of tickborne relapsing fever spirochete, Austin, Texas, USA. Emerg Infect Dis 2018;24(11):2003 − 9. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2411.172033.
    [49] Gaffuri A, Sassera D, Calzolari M, Gibelli L, Lelli D, Tebaldi A, et al. Tick-borne encephalitis, Lombardy, Italy. Emerg Infect Dis 2024;30(2):341 − 4. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid3002.231016.
    [50] Kahl O, Bulling I, Chitimia-Dobler L. Some new findings on the endophilic vector tick Ixodes hexagonus in Germany. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis 2022;13(4):101954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2022.101954.
    [51] Yu XJ, Liang MF, Zhang SY, Liu Y, Li JD, Sun YL, et al. Fever with thrombocytopenia associated with a novel bunyavirus in China. N Engl J Med 2011;364(16):1523 − 32. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1010095.
    [52] Yun SM, Lee WG, Ryou J, Yang SC, Park SW, Roh JY, et al. Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus in ticks collected from humans, South Korea, 2013. Emerg Infect Dis 2014;20(8):1358 − 61. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2008.131857.
    [53] Park SW, Ryou J, Choi WY, Han MG, Lee WJ. Epidemiological and clinical features of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome during an outbreak in South Korea, 2013-2015. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2016;95(6):1358 − 61. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.16-0251.
    [54] Park SW, Song BG, Shin EH, Yun SM, Han MG, Park MY, et al. Prevalence of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus in Haemaphysalis longicornis ticks in South Korea. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis 2014;5(6):975 − 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2014.07.020.
    [55] Liu Q, He B, Huang SY, Wei F, Zhu XQ. Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome, an emerging tick-borne zoonosis. Lancet Infect Dis 2014;14(8):763 − 72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(14)70718-2.
    [56] Azad AF, Beard CB. Rickettsial pathogens and their arthropod vectors. Emerg Infect Dis 1998;4(2):179 − 86. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid0402.980205.
    [57] Karbowiak G, Biernat B, Stańczak J, Szewczyk T, Werszko J. The role of particular tick developmental stages in the circulation of tick-borne pathogens affecting humans in Central Europe. 3. Rickettsiae. Ann Parasitol 2016;62(2):89 − 100. https://doi.org/10.17420/ap6202.38.
    [58] Whitworth T, Popov V, Han V, Bouyer D, Stenos J, Graves S, et al. Ultrastructural and genetic evidence of a reptilian tick, Aponomma hydrosauri, as a host of Rickettsia honei in Australia: possible transovarial transmission. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2003;990(1):67 − 74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb07339.x.
    [59] Salomon J, Fernandez Santos NA, Zecca IB, Estrada-Franco JG, Davila E, Hamer GL, et al. Brown dog tick (Rhipicephalus sanguineus sensu lato) infection with endosymbiont and human pathogenic Rickettsia spp. , in northeastern México. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022;19(10):6249. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19106249.
    [60] Vaculová T, Derdáková M, Špitalská E, Václav R, Chvostáč M, Rusňáková Tarageľová V. Simultaneous occurrence of Borrelia miyamotoi, Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Rickettsia helvetica in Ixodes ricinus ticks in urban foci in Bratislava, Slovakia. Acta Parasitol 2019;64(1):19 − 30. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11686-018-00004-w.
    [61] Padgett KA, Bonilla D, Eremeeva ME, Glaser C, Lane RS, Porse CC, et al. The eco-epidemiology of pacific coast tick fever in California. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2016;10(10):e0005020. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0005020.
    [62] Prusinski M, O'Connor C, Russell A, Sommer J, White J, Rose L, et al. Associations of Anaplasma phagocytophilum bacteria variants in Ixodes scapularis ticks and humans, New York, USA. Emerg Infect Dis 2023;29(3):540 − 50. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2903.220320.
    [63] Zhuo M, Calev H, Saunders SJ, Li JH, Stillman IE, Danziger J. Acute kidney injury associated with human granulocytic anaplasmosis: a case report. Am J Kidney Dis 2019;74(5):696 − 9. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.03.428.
    [64] Didyk YM, Blaňárová L, Pogrebnyak S, Akimov I, Peťko B, Víchová B. Emergence of tick-borne pathogens (Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Ricketsia raoultii and Babesia microti) in the Kyiv urban parks, Ukraine. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis 2017;8(2):219 − 25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2016.10.002.
    [65] Hamel D, Silaghi C, Zapadynska S, Kudrin A, Pfister K. Vector-borne pathogens in ticks and EDTA-blood samples collected from client-owned dogs, Kiev, Ukraine. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis 2013;4(1-2):152 − 5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2012.08.005.
    [66] Földvári G, Jahfari S, Rigó K, Jablonszky M, Szekeres S, Majoros G, et al. Candidatus neoehrlichia mikurensis and Anaplasma phagocytophilum in urban hedgehogs. Emerg Infect Dis 2014;20(3):496 − 8. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2003.130935.
    [67] Kurokawa C, Lynn GE, Pedra JHF, Pal U, Narasimhan S, Fikrig E. Interactions between Borrelia burgdorferi and ticks. Nat Rev Microbiol 2020;18(10):587 − 600. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-020-0400-5.
    [68] Sormunen JJ, Kulha N, Klemola T, Mäkelä S, Vesilahti EM, Vesterinen EJ. Enhanced threat of tick-borne infections within cities? Assessing public health risks due to ticks in urban green spaces in Helsinki, Finland. Zoonoses Public Health 2020;67(7):823 − 39. https://doi.org/10.1111/zph.12767.
    [69] Piedmonte NP, Shaw SB, Prusinski MA, Fierke MK. Landscape features associated with blacklegged tick (Acari: Ixodidae) density and tick-borne pathogen prevalence at multiple spatial scales in central New York state. J Med Entomol 2018;55(6):1496 − 508. https://doi.org/10.1093/jme/tjy111.
    [70] Gray JS, Estrada-Peña A, Zintl A. Vectors of babesiosis. Annu Rev Entomol 2019;64:149 − 65. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-011118-111932.
    [71] Lemieux JE, Tran AD, Freimark L, Schaffner SF, Goethert H, Andersen KG, et al. A global map of genetic diversity in Babesia microti reveals strong population structure and identifies variants associated with clinical relapse. Nat Microbiol 2016;1(7):16079. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.79.
    [72] Yabsley MJ, Shock BC. Natural history of Zoonotic Babesia: role of wildlife reservoirs. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl 2012;2:18 − 31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijppaw.2012.11.003.
    [73] Wang SS, Liu JY, Wang BY, Wang WJ, Cui XM, Jiang JF, et al. Geographical distribution of Ixodes persulcatus and associated pathogens: analysis of integrated data from a China field survey and global published data. One Health 2023;16:100508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2023.100508.
    [74] Gebreyes WA, Dupouy-Camet J, Newport MJ, Oliveira CJB, Schlesinger LS, Saif YM, et al. The global one health paradigm: challenges and opportunities for tackling infectious diseases at the human, animal, and environment interface in low-resource settings. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2014;8(11):e3257. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003257.
    [75] Ub GR, Narladkar BW. Role of entomopathogenic fungi in tick control: a Review. J Entomol Zool Stud 2018;6(1):1265-9. https://www.entomoljournal.com/archives/2018/vol6issue1/PartR/6-1-112-205.pdf.
    [76] Sonenshine DE. Tick pheromones and their use in tick control. Annu Rev Entomol 2006;51:557 − 80. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.51.110104.151150.
    [77] Allan SA, inventor; Sonenshine DE, inventor; Burridge MJ, inventor. Tick pheromones and uses thereof. United States patent US 6331297. 2001 Dec 18. https://www.ars.usda.gov/research/publications/publication/?seqNo115=131819.
    [78] Benelli G, Pavela R, Canale A, Mehlhorn H. Tick repellents and acaricides of botanical origin: a green roadmap to control tick-borne diseases? Parasitol Res 2016;115(7):2545-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00436-016-5095-1.
    [79] Araújo PS, Caixeta MB, Canedo A, da Silva Nunes E, Monteiro C, Rocha TL. Toxicity of plant-based silver nanoparticles to vectors and intermediate hosts: historical review and trends. Sci Total Environ 2022;834:155299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155299.
    [80] Wu YY, Ling F, Chen ZP, Lin JF, Shang XP, Hou J, et al. Lethal activity of propylene glycol alginate against Haemaphysalis longicornis larvae. Chin J Vector Biol Control 2017;28(1):16 − 9. https://doi.org/10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2017.01.005.
    [81] Brianti E, Falsone L, Napoli E, Prudente C, Gaglio G, Giannetto S. Efficacy of a combination of 10% imidacloprid and 4. 5% flumethrin (Seresto®) in slow release collars to control ticks and fleas in highly infested dog communities. Parasit Vectors 2013;6:210. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-6-210.
    [82] Brianti E, Pennisi MG, Brucato G, Risitano AL, Gaglio G, Lombardo G, et al. Efficacy of the fipronil 10%+(S)-methoprene 9% combination against Rhipicephalus sanguineus in naturally infested dogs: speed of kill, persistent efficacy on immature and adult stages and effect of water. Vet Parasitol 2010;170(1-2):96 − 103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.01.033.
    [83] Borges LMF, de Sousa LAD, da Silva Barbosa C. Perspectives for the use of plant extracts to control the cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2011;20(2):89 − 96. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1984-29612011000200001.
    [84] Haag-Wackernagel D. Regulation of the street pigeon in Basel. Wildl Soc Bull 1995;23(2):256-60. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3782800.
    [85] Drelich A, Andreassen Å, Vainio K, Kruszyński P, Wąsik TJ. Prevalence of tick-borne encephalitis virus in a highly urbanized and low risk area in Southern Poland. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis 2014;5(6):663 − 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2014.04.020.
    [86] Bayles BR, Evans G, Allan BF. Knowledge and prevention of tick-borne diseases vary across an urban-to-rural human land-use gradient. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis 2013;4(4):352 − 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2013.01.001.
    [87] Uspensky I. Tick pests and vectors (Acari: Ixodoidea) in European towns: introduction, persistence and management. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis 2014;5(1):41 − 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2013.07.011.
    [88] Ge B, Li XC, Zhang Y, Zhang HB, Hu XD, Zhou YB, et al. Investigation on the knowledge of tick in those with high frequency contact poultry and livestock in Fengxian district of Shanghai. Chin J Hyg Insect Equip 2020;26(4):379 − 82. https://doi.org/10.19821/j.1671-2781.2020.04.024.
    [89] Cao GP, Zhan BD, Zhong JY, Yu ZY, Zhang JM, Chen ZB, et al. Status of tick distribution and tick-borne pathogens in urban parks of Quzhou, Zhejiang, 2017-2019. Dis Surveill 2021;36(9):879 − 83. https://doi.org/10.3784/jbjc.202106010314.
    [90] Mader EM, Ganser C, Geiger A, Harrington LC, Foley J, Smith RL, et al. A survey of tick surveillance and control practices in the United States. J Med Entomol 2021;58(4):1503 − 12. https://doi.org/10.1093/jme/tjaa094.
    [91] Machtinger ET, Poh KC, Pesapane R, Tufts DM. An integrative framework for tick management: the need to connect wildlife science, One Health, and interdisciplinary perspectives. Curr Opin Insect Sci 2024;61:101131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cois.2023.101131.

Citation:

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents

Article Metrics

Article views(486) PDF downloads(2) Cited by()

Share

Related

An Alarming Public Health Problem: Ticks and Tick-Borne Pathogens in Urban Recreational Parks

View author affiliations

Abstract

Ticks function as critical vectors for a wide range of pathogens that pose significant risks to both human and animal health. In recent years, the number and diversity of tick-borne pathogens have increased at an unprecedented rate, elevating tick-borne diseases (TBDs) to a major public health concern on a global scale. TBDs present a dual challenge, not only affecting human populations but also causing substantial economic losses in livestock industries across the world. The geographic distribution of many TBDs is shifting, with emerging, re-emerging, and resurging cases influenced by environmental factors such as deforestation and climate change. In China, rapid urbanization and concurrent improvements in urban ecological conditions have contributed to the expansion of tick habitats and increased human exposure to tick populations. Recent research warns that ticks and their associated pathogens present significant risks in urban environments, particularly in locations such as parks, playgrounds, and zoos. Despite these threats, public awareness of tick-borne diseases remains critically low. This review consolidates current knowledge on tick species and tick-borne pathogens found in urban parks and proposes strategic control measures to inform effective tick management policies both in China and globally.

  • 1. Shanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai, China
  • 2. School of Public Health, Fudan University Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai, China
  • Corresponding authors:

    Xin Chen, chenxin@scdc.sh.cn

    Hongxia Liu, liuhongxia@scdc.sh.cn

  • Funding: Supported by the Clinical Research Special Project in Health Profession of Shanghai (202240331) and The Sixth Round of Three-Year Public Health Action Plan of Shanghai (No. GWⅥ-11.1-13)
  • Online Date: April 18 2025
    Issue Date: April 18 2025
    doi: 10.46234/ccdcw2025.091
  • Ticks are hematophagous arthropods that parasitize humans and animals (1). Second only to mosquitoes in their epidemiological significance, ticks serve as crucial vectors for numerous infectious pathogens (2). Currently, China possesses approximately 125 tick species (3). The global prevalence of tick-borne pathogens and their associated diseases is continuously rising, posing significant threats to human health, labor productivity, livestock industry profitability, and biodiversity (3).

    While often found in forested, mountainous, and hilly regions, environmental improvements have expanded the suitable habitat of ticks into urban areas, particularly recreational parks. The growing presence of ticks and tick-borne pathogens in these environments presents an emerging public health concern that demands attention (4-5). Multiple studies investigating urban tick populations have demonstrated their widespread presence in urban landscapes (6-7). Notably, the diversity and prevalence of tick-borne diseases (TBDs) in urban environments now rival those observed in non-urban settings. Despite increasing reports of tick infestations in urban parks, comprehensive reviews addressing this significant public health concern remain limited. This review first examines the tick species and tick-borne pathogens present in urban recreational parks, followed by an analysis of the potential prevention measures as well as control strategies.

    • Ixodes ricinus L. (Acari: Ixodidae), commonly known as the castor bean tick, is a significant vector of several pathogens of medical and veterinary importance. This species progresses through four main developmental stages: eggs, larvae, nymphs, and adults (male or female) (8). It predominantly inhabits deciduous and mixed forests, as well as woodlands, moorlands, and scrublands, where its survival and reproduction depend on suitable microclimatic conditions and host availability. Urban hedgehog populations can effectively maintain stable I. ricinus populations in metropolitan areas (910). Studies in the UK have documented tick presence across various life stages in 7.2% of transects in Bushy Park and 37.6% in Richmond Park. Ixodes scapularis Say and I. pacificus Cooley & Kohls (Acari: Ixodidae), known respectively as the deer tick and western black-legged tick, are principal vectors of human pathogens in the United States. Following egg hatching, these species undergo three developmental stages — larva, nymph, and adult — with a typical lifespan of around 2 years (11). I. scapularis primarily inhabits unmaintained herbaceous vegetation, maintained lawns, and leaf litter in urban parks, with adults showing higher density in edge ecotones and nymphs predominantly occupying the leaf layer (12). In contrast, I. pacificus primarily associates with grassy areas within urban park environments (13).

      Ixodes persulcatus Schulze (Acari: Ixodidae), the taiga tick, represents one of the most significant disease vectors affecting humans and animals across the Northern Hemisphere, with a distribution spanning the entirety of the Eurasian continent (14). As a characteristic forest tick, I. persulcatus dominates coniferous and broadleaf mixed forests. Its breeding habitats in urban recreational parks encompass coniferous forests, broadleaf forests, mixed forests, shrublands, and grasslands (15).

      Ixodes hexagonus Leach (Acari: Ixodidae), the hedgehog tick, represents one of the most prevalent tick species in Central Europe. While I. hexagonus parasitizes various carnivorous mammals in suburban environments, all developmental stages most frequently occur on hedgehogs (16). This species-host association remains present in urban recreational parks across Europe, where hedgehogs serve as the primary hosts (1719).

      Haemaphysalis longicornis Neumann (Acari: Ixodidae) commonly known as the long-horned tick, is native to East Asia. Its life cycle comprises four developmental stages: egg, larva, nymph, and adult (20). This species inhabits diverse ecological niches within parks, including shrubland, grassland, deciduous forests, mixed forests, and coniferous forests. Among these habitats, these four major biomes support significantly higher tick populations compared to other environments: broadleaf forests, coniferous forests, shrublands, and grasslands (21-22).

      Hemaphysalis flava Neumann (Acari: Ixodidae) is widely distributed throughout East Asia and progresses through four developmental stages: egg, larva, nymph, and adult (2326). Studies have demonstrated that H. flava exhibits a strong association with woodland habitats in urban parks, with peak collection rates from domestic dogs and cats occurring in October and notably minor prevalence during the summer months of July and August (24,27).

      Amblyomma americanum (Acari: Ixodidae), the lone star tick, is an aggressive three-host tick predominantly found in eastern North America, with particular prevalence in the south of the United States. This species maintains its population through feeding on white-tailed deer, ground-nesting birds, and various other wildlife hosts (28). Surveillance studies have documented substantial Am. americanus populations in residential parks featuring paved walking trails, golf putting greens, and recreational playgrounds in the state of Oklahoma, USA (29).

      Dermacentor reticulatus Fabricius (Acari: Ixodidae), the ornate cow tick, belongs to the Metastriata group of ixodid ticks (30). The highest density of D. reticulata was recorded in a suburban park in northern Italy. Mixed forest areas dominated by oak trees and characterized by the presence of ponded waters are the main habitats of this tick species (3132).

      Dermacentor occidentalis Marx (Acari: Ixodidae) is distributed throughout California, except for the arid regions of the Central Valley and southeastern desert (33). The species has also been documented in neighboring US states such as Oregon and Baja California in Mexico (34). Its life cycle exhibits stage-specific host preferences: immature stages primarily parasitize rodents, particularly squirrels, while adults preferentially feed on larger mammals including cattle, horses, deer, and humans. Adult ticks remain active year-round, with peak activity observed during the months of April and May, while nymphal stages predominate during spring and summer months. While adults commonly parasitize cattle, horses, deer, and humans, they are rarely found on dogs and bears. The species is frequently encountered in urban parks throughout southern California, USA (13).

      Dermacentor variabilis Say (Acari: Ixodidae), commonly known as the American dog tick or wood tick, is a widespread three-host tick species in North America that parasitizes a diverse array of hosts, including humans (35). Studies have demonstrated that this species predominantly inhabits grasslands, shrublands, savannahs, and woodlands in urban areas, with native encroaching tree species potentially contributing to increased tick populations (36). The species is frequently encountered in urban parks throughout the United States (3738).

      Rhipicephalus sanguineus Latreille (Acari: Ixodidae), the brown dog tick, exhibits a strong host preference for dogs but occasionally parasitizes other hosts, including humans (39). This species is commonly associated with stray dogs in urban parks. Host infestation can result in severe clinical manifestations, including anemia, weight loss, developmental stunting, and in extreme cases, can induce mortality (4042).

      Ornithodoros spheniscus (Acari: Argasidae), a human-aggressive tick species, primarily parasitizes seabirds in Chile (43). The saliva of ticks within the genus Ornithodoros contains multiple toxic compounds (44). O. spheniscus has been documented parasitizing seabirds and causing toxicosis in humans who were bitten in a Chilean national park (45).

      Ornithodoros turicata (Acari: Argasidae) is distributed throughout several regions of North America (46). This species demonstrates promiscuous feeding behavior, parasitizing hosts such as ground pigs, squirrels, prairie dogs, snakes, and gopher tortoises (47). O. turicata ticks have been collected in public parks containing rodent waste (48).

    • Tick-borne encephalitis, a significant public health concern, is caused by tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV). The virus comprises 5 distinct genotypes, with the European, Siberian, and Far Eastern variants being predominant, each characterized by unique epidemiological patterns and clinical manifestations (49). In urban parks across Europe, TBEV transmission primarily occurs through bites from Ixodes ticks, particularly I. ricinus (50).

      Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome (SFTS), an emerging infectious disease, is caused by the SFTS virus (SFTSV), a novel member of the order Bunyavirals in the family Phenuiviridae (5152). This syndrome has been documented throughout East Asian countries, including the Republic of Korea (ROK) (5354). SFTSV maintains its circulation through an enzootic cycle involving ticks and vertebrate hosts. Haemaphysalis longicornis ticks, which serve as vectors for SFTSV, are widely distributed throughout China (55).

      Rickettsiae are obligate intracellular Gram-negative bacteria belonging to the genus Rickettsia within the Rickettsiaceae family, order Rickettsiales. These pathogens cause human diseases primarily through vector-borne transmission (via ticks, lice, mites, and fleas) and occasionally through airborne routes (56). Rickettsiae are classified into two main groups: the typhus group and the spotted fever group (SFG). SFG rickettsiae are predominantly associated with hard ticks (Ixodidae), with exceptions being R. akari (mite-borne) and R. felis (flea-borne). Ixodes ticks can maintain and propagate SFG Rickettsia (SFGR) through both transovarian and transovarial transmission (5758). Recent studies have identified R. sanguineus as a crucial vector for SFGR transmission between domestic dogs and humans (59). SFGR exhibits a global distribution pattern with potential for further geographic expansion through vector ticks. Research has confirmed SFGR presence in urban forest park tick populations (35,60). Notable examples include the detection of two SFG rickettsiae — R. rhipicephali and Rickettsia sp. 364D (now R. philipii) (61) — in D. occidentalis in southern California, United States. In Ukraine, researchers documented Rickettsia raoultii presence in ticks across three different parks, with infection rates varying from 5% to 68%.

      Anaplasma phagocytophilum is an obligate intracellular bacterium that causes human granulocytic anaplasmosis (HGA), an acute febrile illness prevalent throughout the Northern Hemisphere (62). The clinical manifestations of HGA range from mild to severe, with subclinical symptoms including fever, cough, headache, diarrhea, and vomiting, while critical cases may progress to sepsis, multiple organ failure syndrome, and acute nephritis (63). Studies have demonstrated significantly higher prevalence of A. phagocytophilum in ticks collected from urban parks (6465). For instance, an ecoepidemiologic investigation conducted during 2009-2011 revealed that A. phagocytophilum was detected in 67 (76.1%) of 88 urban hedgehogs sampled from Margaret Island in Budapest, Hungary (66).

      The causative agent of Lyme disease, Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato (BBSL), relies on Ixodes ticks for transmission to vertebrate hosts. These spirochetes have evolved complex interactions with their tick vectors to maintain basic metabolic functions and optimize their colonization, persistence, and transmission cycles (67). BBSL infections are particularly prevalent in I. ricinus populations across European urban parks, though infection rates show considerable spatial variation (10,12,68). In the United States, studies from New York have documented high BBSL infection rates in I. scapularis collected from urban parks (69). Similarly in China, research by Cao et al. revealed a 13.1% positivity rate for B. burgdorferi in ticks sampled from urban parks in Quzhou, Zhejiang province.

      Piroplasmas (class: Aconoidasida, order: Piroplasmida), comprising parasites in the families Babesiidae and Theileriidae, are the etiological agents of piroplasmosis (70). These parasites can be transmitted to mammals, including humans, during blood feeding by all tick life stages through transovarian transmission (71). Babesia species are intraerythrocytic protozoan parasites with complex life cycles involving multiple developmental stages and morphological forms, maintained in nature through transmission between Ixodes ticks and various mammalian hosts. While over 100 Babesia species have been documented, only a select few - notably B. microti, B. divergens, and B. duncani - are confirmed human pathogens (70,72). I. ricinus serves as the primary vector for piroplasma transmission across Europe, while this role is predominantly fulfilled by I. persulcatus in China (8,73).

    • From a macro perspective, the One Health concept provides a comprehensive framework for managing health crises by integrating human, animal, and ecosystem health, with TBD management as its integral component (74).

      The cornerstone of TBD management lies in effective tick control. While chemical control remains a common approach for tick mitigation, there are currently no registered insecticides specifically approved for environmental tick control. For parasitic ticks, acaricide application involves direct treatment of tick-prone hosts through spraying, water-based acaricide baths, or topical “pour-on” preparations (75). However, prolonged acaricide use presents two significant challenges: the development of tick resistance and adverse environmental impacts on non-target organisms, particularly birds and beneficial insects. For free-ranging ticks, recent advances in pheromone-aided management techniques have shown considerable promise, as highlighted by Sonenshine (76). These innovative approaches include: 1) pheromone-enhanced matrices for vegetation application, 2) tick decoys, 3) bont tick (Am. hebraeum) decoys, and 4) pheromone confusants. The pheromone-enhanced matrix system targets nymphal and adult deer ticks by incorporating specific attractant components such as guanine, xanthine, and hematin. These components can be combined with acaricides such as permethrin in oily droplets or microfibers for field application (7778). Additionally, silver nanoparticles (Ag NPs) have emerged as a promising avenue for biomedical applications, particularly in managing free-ranging tick populations (79). However, the implementation of chemical control methods for free-ranging ticks remains an incremental process, with limited registered pesticides available for environmental application (80). Research in this area has been relatively sparse, with only a few studies exploring alternatives such as plant-derived extracts for free-ranging tick control (81-83).

      Two key interventions have been identified for effective tick control in urban parks. First, reducing potential tick host populations is essential. For example, in Basel, Switzerland, pigeon populations were halved as a result of implementing feeding bans (84). Additionally, implementing systematic management strategies for urban rodents and stray dogs and cats has proven effective for tick control (8586). Second, maintaining park infrastructure through regular garbage collection and vegetation management, particularly along human pathways and trails, is essential (87). Beyond these population control measures, raising public awareness about tick bite risks, potential tick habitats, and fundamental personal protection practices is paramount (8889). While regional variations exist in tick-borne disease management strategies — including environmental control, chemical interventions, personal protection measures, and health education — any adopted strategy must adhere to scientific principles and demonstrate both reasonability and feasibility to ensure effective control of tick-borne diseases.

      Regular evaluation of control measures and strengthened tick surveillance are essential for assessing intervention effectiveness. China has established comprehensive monitoring networks for both parasitic and free-living ticks. In the United States, the CDC provides guidance and financial support to states for implementing tick surveillance initiatives, incorporating tick data collection within ArboNET, their existing arthropod-borne disease surveillance framework (90). In Europe, Italy maintains tick-borne disease surveillance as a crucial component of their human health program, emphasizing human data and expertise (91). These diverse national approaches to tick and tick-borne disease surveillance and control demonstrate global commitment to addressing this public health challenge. The effectiveness of control measures can be evaluated through monitoring changes in tick density and tick-borne disease infection rates.

    • Tick infestation in urban parks represents a significant and escalating public health concern. The documented tick species belong to two families - Ixodidae and Argasidae — with hard ticks (Ixodidae) comprising the majority of species and showing particularly high prevalence rates.

      The detection of diverse pathogens in urban park ticks, including tick-borne encephalitis virus, Bunyavirus, Rickettsia, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Borrelia burgdorferi, and Piroplasmas, appears increasingly common. Over recent decades, both the geographic distribution of tick populations in urban recreational parks and the prevalence of tick-borne diseases have demonstrated a marked expansion. To mitigate disease transmission risk, there is an urgent need to enhance public awareness and education regarding personal protection measures among urban residents.

      Several critical knowledge gaps currently limit our ability to conduct precise risk assessments, particularly the lack of quantitative ecological, epidemiological, and socioecological data. There is a pressing need for comprehensive eco-epidemiological research and surveillance addressing key factors such as tick occurrence patterns, pathogen prevalence rates, vertebrate host dynamics, and human exposure patterns within urban recreational environments. From a broader perspective, understanding the complex factors influencing urban park tick distribution - including vegetation composition, climatic parameters (temperature and humidity), and host animal populations — is crucial. Additionally, further research is needed to elucidate the intricate relationships between tick microbiomes and their effects on tick development, pathogen transmission dynamics, and environmental pesticide efficacy. These challenges require interdisciplinary collaboration among medical practitioners, public health scientists, geographers, meteorologists, and urban park management stakeholders to effectively assess and reduce tick infestation risks and associated disease burden.

    • Professor Tianyun Steven Su of Shandong University/EcoZone International LLC for his valuable editorial guidance and recommendations.

  • Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest.
  • Reference (91)

    Citation:

    Catalog

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return