Advanced Search

Preplanned Studies: Global Species/Biovars and Genotype Diversity Atlas of Brucella spp. — 102 Countries, 1923−2020

View author affiliations
  • Summary

    What is already known about this topic?

    Brucella spp. are facultative intracellular bacteria that can infect many species of animals and humans.

    What is added by this report?

    The global Brucella demonstrates distinct territorial distribution patterns: B. abortus predominantly in Africa and North America, B. melitensis dominates in Asia and Europe, and B. suis is most prevalent in Europe. B. melitensis exhibits the highest host and genotype diversity, with most strains isolated from human cases, indicating persistent animal reservoirs and repeated human transmission. Brucella spp. demonstrates region-specific lineage distributions: African B. abortus strains cluster within abortus B lineage, while Asian, American, and European strains group within abortus C. Eastern Mediterranean B. melitensis strains show predominant distribution across Asia and Europe, while B. suis strains display genetic heterogeneity across different geographical regions.

    What are the implications for public health practice?

    While B. melitensis represents a global public health challenge, B. abortus and B. suis pose more localized concerns. Implementation of livestock brucellosis control programs is essential for reducing human health risks.

  • loading...
  • Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest.
  • Funding: Supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2021YF2301105). The funding agency had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, publication decisions, or manuscript preparation.
  • [1] Bundle DR, McGiven J. Brucellosis: improved diagnostics and vaccine insights from synthetic glycans. Acc Chem Res 2017;50(12):2958 − 67. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00445.
    [2] Whatmore AM, Foster JT. Emerging diversity and ongoing expansion of the genus Brucella. Infect Genet Evol 2021;92:104865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2021.104865.
    [3] Nascimento M, Sousa A, Ramirez M, Francisco AP, Carriço JA, Vaz C. PHYLOViZ 2. 0: providing scalable data integration and visualization for multiple phylogenetic inference methods. Bioinformatics 2017;33(1):128 − 9. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btw582.
    [4] Leylabadlo HE, Bialvaei AZ, Samadi Kafil H. Brucellosis in Iran: why not eradicated? Clin Infect Dis 2015;61(10):1629-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/civ646.
    [5] Pappas G. The changing Brucella ecology: novel reservoirs, new threats. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2010;36 Suppl 1:S8-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2010.06.013.
    [6] Janke NR, Williamson CHD, Drees KP, Suárez-Esquivel M, Allen AR, Ladner JT, et al. Global phylogenomic diversity of Brucella abortus: spread of a dominant lineage. Front Microbiol 2023;14:1287046. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1287046.
    [7] Daugaliyeva А, Sultanov A, Usserbayev B, Baramova S, Modesto P, Adambayeva A, et al. Genotyping of Brucella melitensis and Brucella abortus strains in Kazakhstan using MLVA-15. Infect Genet Evol 2018;58:135 − 44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2017.12.022.
    [8] Tan KK, Tan YC, Chang LY, Lee KW, Nore SS, Yee WY, et al. Full genome SNP-based phylogenetic analysis reveals the origin and global spread of Brucella melitensis. BMC Genomics 2015;16(1):93. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-1294-x.
    [9] Pisarenko SV, Kovalev DA, Volynkina AS, Ponomarenko DG, Rusanova DV, Zharinova NV, et al. Global evolution and phylogeography of Brucella melitensis strains. BMC Genomics 2018;19(1):353. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-4762-2.
    [10] Muñoz PM, Mick V, Sacchini L, Janowicz A, de Miguel MJ, Cherfa MA, et al. Phylogeography and epidemiology of Brucella suis biovar 2 in wildlife and domestic swine. Vet Microbiol 2019;233:68 − 77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2019.04.025.
  • FIGURE 1.  Territory distribution of Brucella spp. Strains.

    Note: The number of strains marked with different color scales; green: refers to the continent with no strains found; red: indicates the continent with the most strains.

    FIGURE 2.  Distribution of areas and composition patterns of Brucella species populations.

    Note: Brucella species are coded with color, and dots on the x-axis indicate the borders of different areas.

    FIGURE 3.  MLVA-11 genotype diversity (A) and MLVA-16 genetic relationship (B) of global B. abortus strains.

    Note: (A) Color marks the MLVA-11 genotypes; numbers in the figure indicate the dominant genotypes; (B) Color-coded countries in which strains isolated from all B. abortus strains were divided into two lineages (abortus A and abortus B), and abortus B were further sorted into C I and C II subgroups.

    FIGURE 4.  MLVA-11 genotypes diversity (A) and MLVA-16 genetic relationships (B) of global B. melitensis strains.

    Note: (A) Color marks the MLVA-11 genotypes; numbers in the figure indicate the dominant genotypes. (B) Color-coded countries in which strains were isolated; all B. melitensis strains were divided into three lineages: East Mediterranean, West Mediterranean, and Americas.

    FIGURE 5.  MLVA-11 genotype diversity (A) and MLVA-16 genetic relationships (B) of global B. suis strains.

    Note: (A) Color marks the MLVA-11 genotypes; numbers in the figure indicate the dominant genotypes; (B) Color-coded countries in which strains were isolated; all B. suis strains were divided into two lineages (S I and S II), and further S I was further sorted into three subgroups (a-c).

Citation:

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents

Article Metrics

Article views(1902) PDF downloads(8) Cited by()

Share

Related

Global Species/Biovars and Genotype Diversity Atlas of Brucella spp. — 102 Countries, 1923−2020

View author affiliations

Summary

What is already known about this topic?

Brucella spp. are facultative intracellular bacteria that can infect many species of animals and humans.

What is added by this report?

The global Brucella demonstrates distinct territorial distribution patterns: B. abortus predominantly in Africa and North America, B. melitensis dominates in Asia and Europe, and B. suis is most prevalent in Europe. B. melitensis exhibits the highest host and genotype diversity, with most strains isolated from human cases, indicating persistent animal reservoirs and repeated human transmission. Brucella spp. demonstrates region-specific lineage distributions: African B. abortus strains cluster within abortus B lineage, while Asian, American, and European strains group within abortus C. Eastern Mediterranean B. melitensis strains show predominant distribution across Asia and Europe, while B. suis strains display genetic heterogeneity across different geographical regions.

What are the implications for public health practice?

While B. melitensis represents a global public health challenge, B. abortus and B. suis pose more localized concerns. Implementation of livestock brucellosis control programs is essential for reducing human health risks.

  • 1. National Key Laboratory of Intelligent Tracking and Forecasting for Infectious Diseases, National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China
  • 2. National Key Laboratory of Intelligent Tracking and Forecasting for Infectious Diseases, National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China
  • 3. Ulanqab Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Jining City, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China
  • 4. Tongliao Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Horqin District, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China
  • 5. Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China
  • 6. Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi City, Shanxi Province, China
  • Corresponding author:

    Zhenjun Li, lizhenjun@icdc.cn

  • Funding: Supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2021YF2301105). The funding agency had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, publication decisions, or manuscript preparation.
  • Online Date: January 24 2025
    Issue Date: January 24 2025
    doi: 10.46234/ccdcw2025.023
  • Brucellosis represents a globally prevalent zoonotic disease that poses significant public health challenges and causes substantial economic losses in livestock populations (1). The past few decades has witnessed continuous expansion in recognized diversity within the Brucella genus, with novel strains isolated from marine mammals to ocean fish revealing previously unknown ecological niches (2). These developments present new challenges for both regional and global surveillance and control of brucellosis. However, global species/biovars and genotype diversity atlas of Brucella spp. remain unclear. Therefore, this study aims to elucidate the global distribution patterns of species/biovars and genetic diversity among Brucella strains to enhance understanding of epidemiological changes and facilitate tailored surveillance and control strategies worldwide.

    In this study, 7,212 Brucella strains collected from multiple locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) databases (https://microbesgenotyping.i2bc.paris-saclay.fr/databases) through June 30, 2024, representing isolates collected in 102 countries from 1923 to 2020. Data extraction included species/biovar, isolation location, quantity, host spectrum, panel 1 profiles, MLVA-11 patterns, lineage information, and isolation dates. Data analysis was performed using Excel 2021 software (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA). The minimum spanning tree (MST) was constructed using PHYLOVIZ 2.0 (3) online software (https://online2.phyloviz.net/index) to elucidate genetic relationships among strains.

    Among the 7,212 Brucella strains analyzed, at least 12 species, 19 biovars, and several atypical Brucella species were identified (Figure 1). B. abortus strains distributed across 59 countries (regions) spanning six continents, while B. melitensis exhibited widespread presence in 64 countries throughout Asia, Europe, and North Africa (Figure 1). Notably, the distribution pattern of B. melitensis correlates strongly with regions reporting high incidence rates of brucellosis in both humans and animals. B. suis strains were documented in 34 countries across Europe, North America, and Latin America. B. canis demonstrated a more limited geographic range, primarily concentrated in East Asia and Latin America (Figure 1). Other species showed distinct regional patterns: B. neotomae in North America; B. ovis in Europe, North Africa, Oceania, and Latin America; B. ceti predominantly in West Europe and North America; B. microti concentrated in Middle Europe; B. papionis restricted to Tanzania and USA; B. vulpis exclusively in Austria; and B. pinnip primarily in Europe (Figure 1). These distribution patterns indicate the global predominance of B. abortus and B. melitensis, while other species exhibit distinct geographic specificities.

    Figure 1. 

    Territory distribution of Brucella spp. Strains.

    Note: The number of strains marked with different color scales; green: refers to the continent with no strains found; red: indicates the continent with the most strains.

    The predominant species was B. melitensis (n=4,042, 56.05%), followed by B. abortus (n=2,600), B. suis (n=695), and B. canis (n=52) (Supplementary Table S1). The geographic distribution of B. abortus biovars showed distinct patterns, for example: biovar 1 was predominantly found in Portugal, South Korea, and Brazil; and biovar 9 in Xinjiang, China. Within the B. melitensis population, biovar 3 (n=1,909) was dominated species. B. melitensis biovars 1 and 3 showed widespread distribution across Asia and Europe, particularly in Asian countries with high brucellosis prevalence.

    The B. suis population exhibited distinct biovar distributions, such as B. suis biovar 1 showed broad geographic distribution across China, the USA, Mexico, France, Zimbabwe, Egypt, and Australia. B. ovis (n=53) was distributed across France, Spain, Brazil, Greece, the USA, Australia, New Zealand, Croatia, and Argentina. B. neotomae (n=13) was confined to Costa Rica and the USA. Among non-classical species, there were 173 B. ceti isolates, 61 B. pinnipedialis isolates, 13 B. microti isolates, 2 B. papionis isolates, and 1 B. vulpis isolate. B. ceti was predominantly found in Scotland, Italy, Spain, Costa Rica, Germany, France, and the UK. B. microti was isolated from the Czech Republic and Austria, B. papionis from Tanzania and the USA, and B. pinnipedialis from Scotland, Norway, United Kingdom, and USA.

    Asia exhibits the lowest species diversity, with B. abortus and B. melitensis being the only classical species distributed across all Asian countries (Figure 2). Sporadic cases of B. suis have been documented in China, India, Nepal, Palestine, and the United Arab Emirates, while B. canis has been reported exclusively in China, Republic of Korea, and Japan. This species distribution profile aligns precisely with the regions reporting the highest human brucellosis burden in Asia. Notably, substantial isolations of B. melitensis have been recorded in China, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Palestine, Qatar, and Turkey - countries that consistently report among the highest global incidence rates of brucellosis.

    Figure 2. 

    Distribution of areas and composition patterns of Brucella species populations.

    Note: Brucella species are coded with color, and dots on the x-axis indicate the borders of different areas.

    Europe demonstrates higher species diversity than other continents, with 9 of the 12 known species documented (Figure 2). Three species (B. abortus, B. melitensis, and B. suis) are widely distributed across the continent, particularly in historically high-burden regions. B. suis exhibits a unique continental distribution pattern, with significant presence in Hungary, Germany, Belgium, France, Croatia, Spain, and Portugal, predominantly isolated from swine and wild boar populations. These findings suggest that despite successful control of brucellosis in Europe’s historically endemic areas, continued surveillance remains essential.

    Despite Africa being a historically endemic region for brucellosis, comprehensive data on Brucella species and genotypes remain limited due to insufficient surveillance in recent decades. B. abortus strains are particularly prevalent throughout South and West Africa (Figure 2). In Africa presence of multiple Brucella species, underscoring the need for expanded bacteriological surveillance.

    While Oceania maintains brucellosis-free status with only sporadic isolations of B. abortus, B. suis, and B. ovis (Figure 2), potential public health risks persist through mammalian reservoirs. The Americas exhibit the highest Brucella species diversity globally, with at least 10 documented species, and B. abortus showing the widest geographic distribution (Figure 2). B. melitensis has been documented in regions with substantial human brucellosis burden, including the USA, Mexico, Peru, and Argentina. The continent harbors the highest concentrations of both B. neotomae (11 isolates in the USA) and B. ovis (115 isolates in Argentina), while Costa Rica reports the majority of B. ceti cases.

    The B. abortus population demonstrates remarkable host diversity, with isolates from at least 20 different species. Cattle represent the primary host (n=1,567), followed by bison (n=97) and humans (n=80). B. melitensis exhibits even greater host diversity, with isolations from 24 distinct species, predominantly humans (n=2,719), followed by ovines (n=617) and cattle (n=280). The B. suis population spans 15 host species, B. neotomae has been isolated from both rodents and humans. Host specificity is observed in several species, such as B. papionis in baboons. This extensive host diversity plays a crucial role in maintaining and facilitating the transmission of Brucella strains.

    Within the B. abortus population, 83 multiple locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis-11 genotypes (GTs) were identified, with three GTs (82, 72, and 79) emerging as predominant, representing 28.4% (494/1,735), 22.4% (390/1,735), and 10.7% (187/1,735) of the population, respectively (Figure 3A). GT72 exhibited broad geographic distribution across 17 countries, GT82 was detected in 10 countries across 3 continents, GT79 was identified in 9 countries across 4 continents.

    Figure 3. 

    MLVA-11 genotype diversity (A) and MLVA-16 genetic relationship (B) of global B. abortus strains.

    Note: (A) Color marks the MLVA-11 genotypes; numbers in the figure indicate the dominant genotypes; (B) Color-coded countries in which strains isolated from all B. abortus strains were divided into two lineages (abortus A and abortus B), and abortus B were further sorted into C I and C II subgroups.

    Minimum spanning tree (MST) analysis based on MLVA-16 data revealed that the B. abortus population segregated into two distinct groups (B and C) (Figure 3B), with African strains clustering in abortus B, while strains from Asia, the Americas, and Europe were predominantly found in abortus C (Figure 3B). Within C I, identical MLVA-16 genotypes were shared among strains from the USA, Costa Rica, Kazakhstan, Italy, and Portugal (Figure 3B). In C II, the majority of shared MLVA-16 genotypes were observed between strains from the USA and Portugal, USA and Brazil, and Bangladesh and Brazil (Figure 3B).

    Within the B. melitensis, 216 MLVA-11 genotypes were identified, with five predominant genotypes (GTs): 116, 96, 125, 111, and 87, accounting for 54.4% (2,733/5,019), 7.1% (360/5,019), 6.1% (307/5,019), 3.6% (182/5,019), and 2.2% (112/5,019), respectively (Figure 4A). GT116 was distributed across at least 18 countries, GT96 was identified in nine countries, GT125 was present in 20 countries.

    Figure 4. 

    MLVA-11 genotypes diversity (A) and MLVA-16 genetic relationships (B) of global B. melitensis strains.

    Note: (A) Color marks the MLVA-11 genotypes; numbers in the figure indicate the dominant genotypes. (B) Color-coded countries in which strains were isolated; all B. melitensis strains were divided into three lineages: East Mediterranean, West Mediterranean, and Americas.

    Minimum spanning tree analysis revealed that the B. melitensis clustered into three distinct lineages: Eastern Mediterranean, Western Mediterranean, and Americas (Figure 4B). The Eastern Mediterranean strains predominated in Asia and Europe; the Western Mediterranean lineage comprised strains from Italy, France, Egypt, and Algeria; The American lineage encompassed strains from the USA, Peru, Spain, and Portugal (Figure 4B). Among the three lineages, the Eastern Mediterranean exhibited the highest frequency of shared MLVA-16 genotypes (Figure 4B).

    In the B. suis population, analysis revealed 67 distinct MLVA-11 genotypes, with five dominant circulating genotypes: GT33 (22.2%, 126/592), GT58 (12.6%, 75/592), GT57 (9.2%, 55/592), GT60 (7.9%, 47/592), and GT44 (7.7%, 46/592) (Figure 5A).

    Figure 5. 

    MLVA-11 genotype diversity (A) and MLVA-16 genetic relationships (B) of global B. suis strains.

    Note: (A) Color marks the MLVA-11 genotypes; numbers in the figure indicate the dominant genotypes; (B) Color-coded countries in which strains were isolated; all B. suis strains were divided into two lineages (S I and S II), and further S I was further sorted into three subgroups (a-c).

    Minimum spanning tree analysis demonstrated that B. suis strains clustered into two major lineages (SI and SII), with SI further subdividing into three distinct sub-clades (a−c) (Figure 5B). Notably, shared MLVA-16 genotypes were observed in SI sub-clade b (Figure 5B), while in SII, a single shared MLVA-16 genotype was identified (Figure 5B).

    • Brucella strains exhibit widespread distribution across six continents, the extensive spread and dispersal of these pathogens has been facilitated by frequent livestock exchange and trade (4). The paucity of comprehensive surveys and research in Africa presents a significant obstacle to understanding the disease. Consequently, successful prevention, control, and eradication of brucellosis in low-income countries necessitates substantial financial support, unwavering commitment, and sustained long-term programs. The expanding host spectrum of the Brucella spp. population is a critical factor in its ecological persistence and maintenance. Active spillover between domestic animals and wildlife is increasingly recognized as a potential source of human infection. While Brucella spp. occasionally colonize non-preferred hosts, there remains high potential for discovering additional ecologically significant natural hosts (5).

      Global phylogenomic analysis reveals an African origin for B. abortus, with subsequent spread to the Middle East, Europe, and Asia, likely facilitated by infected cattle movement (6). B. abortus strains from Kazakhstan and Russia show genetic relationships with Portuguese, Brazilian, and US isolates, suggesting ancient lineage dispersal from Europe westward to South America and eastward to Turkey, Russia, and Asia (7).

      The B. melitensis population exhibits the highest genetic diversity, with particularly significant genetic homogeneity observed within the E. Mediterranean lineage, especially among Asian strains. All Asian strains clustering into genotype II alongside SEA strains (8). the spread of B. melitensis subgenotype IIi from Central Asian countries to Russia likely occurred via the northern route of the Great Silk Road, which connected eastern countries with Northern Europe (9). The global trade and movement of ruminants has facilitated the spread and dispersal of B. melitensis, necessitating stricter regulations on animal transfers from high-epidemic areas and enhanced cross-border inspection and quarantine protocols.

      B. suis strains exhibit significant genetic heterogeneity across different global territories. The maintenance and spread of B. suis biovar 2 in Europe represents a dynamic process linked to natural wild boar expansion as the primary wild reservoir, while long-distance transmission largely depends on human activities (10). Surveillance and control measures in endemic European and Asian regions are essential to accurately assess its public health risk.

      This study provides novel insights into the global species/biovars, host spectrum, and genetic diversity of Brucella spp. However, several limitations warrant consideration. First, our reliance on international MLVA database data may present an incomplete distribution overview, necessitating further investigation. Second, the complex transmission dynamics of brucellosis demand more nuanced analysis of the interplay between human behavior, environmental factors, and microbial genetics in disease transmission.

      The global distribution of Brucella species exhibits remarkable genetic and phenotypic diversity, characterized by extensive host range adaptation and broad territorial spread, presenting significant challenges for worldwide surveillance and control efforts. A critical impediment to effective brucellosis management in low-income countries remains the limited allocation of governmental and regional resources. These findings emphasize the urgent need to establish a comprehensive global pathogen surveillance system and molecular tracking network platform to elucidate the composition of circulating Brucella strains and understand the global transmission patterns of brucellosis.

    • All researchers who have previously published data on the isolation, identification, and molecular characterization of Brucella spp. worldwide. The developers and administrators of the international Brucella MLVAbank genotyping databases (Brucella v4_6_5).

  • Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest.
  • Reference (10)

    Citation:

    Catalog

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return