Advanced Search

Methods and Applications: Targeted Analysis of VOCS in Exhaled Breath of Coal Workers’ Pneumoconiosis Patients, An Exploratory Study

View author affiliations
  • Abstract

    Introduction

    Pneumoconiosis represents the most prevalent occupational disease in China, with coal workers’ pneumoconiosis (CWP) showing the highest incidence. Analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the exhaled breath of CWP patients may provide novel insights into its pathogenesis.

    Methods

    Study data were collected through questionnaires and medical examinations. Thermal desorption-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry was employed for targeted VOC analysis. Differential VOCs were identified using OPLS-DA, the Mann-Whitney U test, and fold change analysis. The discriminatory efficacy of differential VOCs was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Spearman correlation analysis explored relationships between differential VOCs, lung function indices, and blood cell levels.

    Results

    The pneumoconiosis group showed elevated concentrations of 10 compounds, including isopentane, n-pentane, and isoprene, while four compounds, including 2,4-dimethylpentane, methylcyclohexane, 2,3,4-trimethylpentane, and 2-methylheptane showed decreased concentrations. Combined univariate and multivariate statistical analyses identified six significant VOCs, including isopentane and pentane. Notably, isopentane and n-pentane demonstrated negative correlations with forced vital capacity and levels, while 2-methylheptane showed positive correlations.

    Discussion

    Clear metabolic differences in VOCs exist between CWP patients and non-dust-exposed healthy controls. Six compounds — isopentane, n-pentane, 3-methylpentane, n-hexane, cyclohexane, and 2-methylheptane — in exhaled breath demonstrate potential as biomarkers for CWP.

  • loading...
  • Conflict of interest: No conflicts of interest.
  • Funding: Supported by the National Center for Occupational Safety and Health Self-management Project of China (2019009) and the Central Public-Interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Project of China (2020-PT320-005)
  • [1] Boots AW, van Berkel JJBN, Dallinga JW, Smolinska A, Wouters EF, van Schooten FJ. The versatile use of exhaled volatile organic compounds in human health and disease. J Breath Res 2012;6(2):027108. https://doi.org/10.1088/1752-7155/6/2/027108CrossRef
    [2] Di Natale C, Macagnano A, Martinelli E, Paolesse R, D’Arcangelo G, Roscioni C, et al. Lung cancer identification by the analysis of breath by means of an array of non-selective gas sensors. Biosens Bioelectron 2003;18(10):1209 − 18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0956-5663(03)00086-1CrossRef
    [3] Li ZT, Zeng PY, Chen ZM, Guan WJ, Wang T, Lin Y, et al. Exhaled volatile organic compounds for identifying patients with chronic pulmonary aspergillosis. Front Med 2021;8:720119. https://doi.org/10.3389/FMED.2021.720119CrossRef
    [4] Yamada YI, Yamada G, Otsuka M, Nishikiori H, Ikeda K, Umeda Y, et al. Volatile organic compounds in exhaled breath of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis for discrimination from healthy subjects. Lung 2017;195(2):247 − 54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-017-9979-3CrossRef
    [5] Zou YC, Wang Y, Jiang ZL, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Hu YJ, et al. Breath profile as composite biomarkers for lung cancer diagnosis. Lung Cancer 2021;154:206 − 13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2021.01.020CrossRef
    [6] Gao R, Peng FD, He YZ, Feng J, Liu WB, Yu LJ, et al. Determination of 27 volatile organic compounds in exhaled breath bythermal desorption-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J Environ Occup Med 2024;41(1):96 − 102. https://doi.org/10.11836/JEOM23283CrossRef
    [7] Foster WM, Jiang L, Stetkiewicz PT, Risby TH. Breath isoprene: temporal changes in respiratory output after exposure to ozone. J Appl Physiol (1985) 1996;80(2):706-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1996.80.2.706.
    [8] Jalali M, Zare Sakhvidi MJ, Bahrami A, Berijani N, Mahjub H. Oxidative stress biomarkers in exhaled breath of workers exposed to crystalline silica dust by SPME-GC-MS. J Res Health Sci 2016;16(3):153 − 61.
    [9] Yang HY, Shie RH, Chang CJ, Chen PC. Development of breath test for pneumoconiosis: a case-control study. Respir Res 2017;18(1):178. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-017-0661-3CrossRef
    [10] Collard HR, King Jr TE, Bartelson BB, Vourlekis JS, Schwarz MI, Brown KK. Changes in clinical and physiologic variables predict survival in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003;168(5):538 − 42. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200211-1311OCCrossRef
    [11] Takei R, Brown KK, Yamano Y, Kataoka K, Yokoyama T, Matsuda T, et al. Prevalence and prognosis of chronic fibrosing interstitial lung diseases with a progressive phenotype. Respirology 2022;27(5):333 − 40. https://doi.org/10.1111/resp.14245CrossRef
    [12] Drabińska N, Flynn C, Ratcliffe N, Belluomo I, Myridakis A, Gould O, et al. A literature survey of all volatiles from healthy human breath and bodily fluids: the human volatilome. J Breath Res 2021;15(3):034001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1752-7163/abf1d0CrossRef
    [13] van der Schee MP, Paff T, Brinkman P, van Aalderen WMC, Haarman EG, Sterk PJ. Breathomics in lung disease. Chest 2015;147(1):224 − 31. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.14-0781CrossRef
    [14] Magnano MC, Ahmed W, Wang R, Bergant Marušič M, Fowler SJ, White IR. Exhaled volatile organic compounds and respiratory disease: recent progress and future outlook. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 2024;176:117739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2024.117739CrossRef
    [15] Phillips M, Cataneo RN, Greenberg J, Gunawardena R, Rahbari-Oskoui F. Increased oxidative stress in younger as well as in older humans. Clin Chim Acta 2003;328(1-2):83 − 6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-8981(02)00380-7CrossRef
  • FIGURE 1.  Multivariate analysis model. (A) The mode of PCA between coal workers’ pneumoconiosis and control group; (B) The mode of OPLS-DA between coal workers’ pneumoconiosis and control group; (C) permutation tests of OPLS-DA models for coal workers’ pneumoconiosis and control group.Abbreviation: PCA=principal component analysis; OPLS-DA=orthogonal partial least squares-discriminant analysis.

    FIGURE 2.  Correlation scatterplot. (A) Correlation analysis of isopentane and FVC (pre%); (B) Correlation analysis of isopentane and FEV1.0(pre%); (C) Correlation analysis of pentane and FVC (pre%); (D) Correlation analysis of pentane and FEV1.0 (pre%); (E) Correlation analysis of 2-methylpentane and FVC (pre%); (F) Correlation analysis of 2-methylpentane and FEV1.0 (pre%).

    Abbreviation: FVC=forced vital capacity; FEV1.0=forced expiratory volume in one second.

    TABLE 1.  Characteristics of subjects.

    Variables CWP (n=42) Control (n=23) P
    Age (years) 67.6±4.8 47.5±5.7 <0.05
    BMI (kg/m2) 24.8±2.9 26.3±2.5 0.510
    Smoking (yes, %) 21 (50.0%) 10 (43.5%) 0.796
    Drinking (yes, %) 23 (56.1%) 13 (56.5%) 1.000
    FVC (predicted %) 67.083±19.411 85.500±10.117 <0.05
    FEV1.0 (predicted %) 79.043±24.699 115.818±11.722 <0.05
    WBC (109/L) 6.384±1.306 6.571±1.492 0.602
    NEU (109/L) 4.841±6.723 3.657±0.963 0.406
    LYM (109/L) 2.059±0.739 2.296±0.755 0.225
    NLR 1.948 (1.432, 2.526) 1.559 (1.131, 2.078) 0.072
    PLR 107.797 (86.118, 134.303) 116.466 (105.208, 135.795) 0.278
    Abbreviation: BMI=body mass index; FVC=forced vital capacity; FEV1.0=forced expiratory volume in one second; WBC=white blood cell; NEU=neutrophil; LYM=lymphocyte; NLR=neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio; PLR=platelet to lymphocyte ratio; CWP=coal workers’pneumoconiosis.
    Download: CSV

    TABLE 2.  Quantitative values of VOCs in each group [Median (25th,75th percentile) ppb].

    VOC CWP (n=42) Control (n=23)
    Iso-pentane* 1.93 (1.004, 3.910) 0.135 (0.069, 0.302)
    1-Pentene 0.152 (0.066, 0.541) 0.17 (0.127, 0.268)
    Pentane* 2.186 (1.325, 3.373) 0.072 (0.020, 0.180)
    Trans-2-Pentene 0.063 (0.063, 0.545) 0.063 (0.063, 0.141)
    Iso-prene* 145.904 (105.775, 188.798) 97.534 (63.288, 105.763)
    2,2-Dimethylbutane 13.513 (7.003, 20.313) 7.773 (6.345, 22.390)
    2-Methylpentane* 0.152 (0.063, 1.724) 0.063 (0.063, 0.133)
    3-Methylpentane* 0.511 (0.135, 2.756) 0.091 (0.012, 0.179)
    1-Hexene* 0.135 (0.078, 1.145) 0.078 (0.078, 0.254)
    Hexane* 1.104 (0.613, 5.399) 0.570 (0.014, 0.900)
    2,4-Dimethylpentane* 0.514 (0.176, 1.023) 1.619 (0.902, 2.187)
    Methyl-cyclopentane* 0.250 (0.104, 1.317) 0.105 (0.005, 0.235)
    2-Methylhexane 0.051 (0.051, 0.070) 0.061 (0.051, 0.086)
    Cyclohexane* 0.178 (0.005, 1.155) 0.005 (0.005, 0.025)
    2,3-Dimethylpentane 0.120 (0.012, 0.273) 0.043 (0.012, 0.156)
    3-Methylhexane 0.045 (0.045, 0.096) 0.196 (0.045, 0.309)
    2,2,4-Trimethylpentane 0.017 (0.017, 0.199) 0.017 (0.017, 0.030)
    Heptane 0.190 (0.129, 0.538) 0.283 (0.166, 1.324)
    Methylcyclohexane* 0.015 (0.005, 0.093) 0.088 (0.032, 0.135)
    Pentanal 0.381 (0.185, 1.195) 0.377 (0.181, 0.748)
    2,3,4-Trimethylpentane* 0.013 (0.013, 0.013) 0.022 (0.017, 0.027)
    2-Methylheptane* 0.039 (0.039, 0.039 0.343 (0.320, 0.442)
    3-Methylheptane 0.027 (0.027, 0.027) 0.027 (0.027, 0.027)
    4-Methyl-2-pentanone 0.003 (0.003, 3.278) 0.003 (0.003, 0.534)
    2-Hexanone* 0.013 (0.013, 0.045) 0.013 (0.013, 0.013)
    Hexanal 0.761 (0.369, 1.739) 0.726 (0.517, 0.990)
    Decane 0.065 (0.050, 0.187) 0.050 (0.050, 0.072)
    Abbreviation: VOC=volatile organic compounds; CWP=coal workers’ pneumoconiosis.
    * P<0.05.
    Download: CSV

Citation:

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents

Article Metrics

Article views(330) PDF downloads(2) Cited by()

Share

Related

Targeted Analysis of VOCS in Exhaled Breath of Coal Workers’ Pneumoconiosis Patients, An Exploratory Study

View author affiliations

Abstract

Introduction

Pneumoconiosis represents the most prevalent occupational disease in China, with coal workers’ pneumoconiosis (CWP) showing the highest incidence. Analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the exhaled breath of CWP patients may provide novel insights into its pathogenesis.

Methods

Study data were collected through questionnaires and medical examinations. Thermal desorption-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry was employed for targeted VOC analysis. Differential VOCs were identified using OPLS-DA, the Mann-Whitney U test, and fold change analysis. The discriminatory efficacy of differential VOCs was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Spearman correlation analysis explored relationships between differential VOCs, lung function indices, and blood cell levels.

Results

The pneumoconiosis group showed elevated concentrations of 10 compounds, including isopentane, n-pentane, and isoprene, while four compounds, including 2,4-dimethylpentane, methylcyclohexane, 2,3,4-trimethylpentane, and 2-methylheptane showed decreased concentrations. Combined univariate and multivariate statistical analyses identified six significant VOCs, including isopentane and pentane. Notably, isopentane and n-pentane demonstrated negative correlations with forced vital capacity and levels, while 2-methylheptane showed positive correlations.

Discussion

Clear metabolic differences in VOCs exist between CWP patients and non-dust-exposed healthy controls. Six compounds — isopentane, n-pentane, 3-methylpentane, n-hexane, cyclohexane, and 2-methylheptane — in exhaled breath demonstrate potential as biomarkers for CWP.

  • 1. National Center for Occupational Safety and Health, NHC, Beijing, China
  • 2. NHC Key Laboratory for Engineering Control of Dust Hazard, Beijing, China
  • 3. Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, China
  • 4. Xishan Coal and Electricity (Group) Co., Ltd. Occupational Disease Prevention and Control Center, Taiyuan City, Shanxi Province, China
  • 5. NHC Key Laboratory of Pneumoconiosis, MOE Key Laboratory of Coal Environmental Pathogenicity and Prevention, Shanxi Key Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases, The First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan City, Shanxi Province, China
  • Corresponding author:

    Chunguang Ding, ding_chg@163.com

  • Funding: Supported by the National Center for Occupational Safety and Health Self-management Project of China (2019009) and the Central Public-Interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Project of China (2020-PT320-005)
  • Online Date: December 27 2024
    Issue Date: December 27 2024
    doi: 10.46234/ccdcw2024.278
  • Coal Workers’ Pneumoconiosis (CWP) is a chronic occupational lung disease that develops following prolonged exposure to mixed coal dust. In China, approximately 15,000 new CWP cases are reported annually. By the end of 2021, the cumulative number of reported occupational pneumoconiosis cases in China reached 915,000, with CWP accounting for 43% of all pneumoconiosis cases. CWP remains a significant public health concern in China, with prevention and treatment challenges persisting. Early screening and diagnosis of CWP represent critical unmet needs in occupational medicine.

    The analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled breath has emerged as a promising non-invasive diagnostic approach for clinical disease surveillance. Studies have demonstrated that exhaled breath VOCs reflect diverse metabolic processes within the body, with inflammation, oxidative stress, and immune responses significantly influencing both VOC composition and concentration (1). VOCs can traverse the air-blood barrier to enter the alveoli, suggesting that exhaled breath VOCs may serve as indicators of systemic metabolic changes, particularly within pulmonary tissue (2). This approach has shown promise in biomarker studies for various respiratory conditions, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (3), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (4), and lung cancer (5). However, research on exhaled breath VOCs in pneumoconiosis remains limited, with previous studies focusing primarily on non-targeted analyses. Notably, no studies have conducted targeted quantitative analyses of exhaled breath from coal workers’ pneumoconiosis patients.

    Therefore, our study employed thermal desorption-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (TD-GC-MS) to conduct targeted quantitative analysis of 27 lung disease-associated VOCs in the exhaled breath (alveolar air) of CWP patients. Our objectives were to identify characteristic VOCs for CWP and explore potential biomarkers. We also evaluated the diagnostic potential of these biomarkers and analyzed their correlations with lung function parameters and blood cell indices.

    • This study recruited 120 volunteers, of whom 65 met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, with ages ranging from 18 to 80 years. Subjects were excluded if they had: (a) autoimmune diseases, diabetes, cancers, asthma, or other chronic inflammatory conditions; (b) undergone lung lavage or any form of lung surgery; or (c) experienced respiratory infections or taken anti-inflammatory or antibiotic medications within 1 week prior to sampling. Demographic information, including smoking history, alcohol consumption, and previous medical history, was collected for all subjects. Lung function and routine blood test results from physical examinations were obtained, with pulmonary function data calculated as percentages of measured values relative to predicted values. All participants provided written informed consent. This study received approval from the Ethics Committee of the First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University (2020-k-k104).

    • Subjects were instructed to avoid consuming foods with strong odors the day before exhaled breath collection and to fast after 22:00 (including abstaining from smoking and drinking). Sample collection was conducted in a clean, ventilated room maintained at 25 °C (±2 °C) before breakfast. Exhaled breath samples were collected using a Bio-VOC sampler equipped with a one-way valve to capture alveolar air. All thermal desorption (TD) tubes underwent heat pretreatment prior to sampling. During collection, subjects rested seated for 10 minutes before exhaling into a Bio-VOC syringe with a disposable mouthpiece. The collected gas was then transferred to the TD tube, with the process repeated twice to obtain approximately 250 mL of exhaled breath. Two environmental blank samples were collected simultaneously as controls. The thermal desorption tubes were subsequently transported to the laboratory for analysis.

      The instrumental methodology has been previously described (6). Detailed methodological parameters are provided in Supplementary Table S1.

    • Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 25.0 (IBM, Armonk, New York, USA). The Mann-Whitney U test was employed to detect significant variations in metabolites between groups, with a significance threshold of 0.05. Compounds with P<0.05 were incorporated into the lasso regression model using age as a covariate. For compounds below the limit of detection (LOD), concentrations were substituted with LOD/√2.

      Multivariate statistical analyses were conducted using SIMCA 14.1 (Umetrics, Upsala, Sweden). Initial group differentiation was performed using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Orthogonal Partial Least Squares-Discriminant Analysis (OPLS-DA) for visual clustering. Differential VOCs were identified using multiple criteria: variable important in projection (VIP)>1, univariate statistical significance (P<0.05), and fold change (FC) >2 or <0.5. Age was included as a covariate, and compounds with univariate statistical significance (P<0.05) were incorporated into the Lasso regression model for adjustment. The discriminatory power of screened VOCs was evaluated through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, with classification ability assessed by area under curve (AUC). Additionally, relationships between variables were examined using Spearman correlation analysis.

    • Prior to data collection, surveyors underwent rigorous training and assessment to ensure standardization of collection protocols. Sample analyses strictly adhered to established experimental procedures and operational protocols. During data processing and analysis, regular quality checks were performed to identify and remove invalid, duplicate, or inconsistent data entries.

    • The study included 65 participants, comprising 42 CWP patients and 23 healthy controls. Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences between the groups regarding BMI, smoking status, alcohol consumption, and blood indices (Table 1). Analysis of VOC content between groups (Table 2) demonstrated that the CWP group exhibited elevated levels of isopentane, n-pentane, isoprene, 2-methylpentane, 3-methylpentane, 1-hexene, n-hexane, methyl cyclopentane, cyclohexane, and 2-hexanone in exhaled breath compared to controls. Conversely, the CWP group showed decreased levels of 2,4-dimethylpentane, methylcyclohexane, 2,3,4-trimethylpentane, and 2-methylheptane.

      Variables CWP (n=42) Control (n=23) P
      Age (years) 67.6±4.8 47.5±5.7 <0.05
      BMI (kg/m2) 24.8±2.9 26.3±2.5 0.510
      Smoking (yes, %) 21 (50.0%) 10 (43.5%) 0.796
      Drinking (yes, %) 23 (56.1%) 13 (56.5%) 1.000
      FVC (predicted %) 67.083±19.411 85.500±10.117 <0.05
      FEV1.0 (predicted %) 79.043±24.699 115.818±11.722 <0.05
      WBC (109/L) 6.384±1.306 6.571±1.492 0.602
      NEU (109/L) 4.841±6.723 3.657±0.963 0.406
      LYM (109/L) 2.059±0.739 2.296±0.755 0.225
      NLR 1.948 (1.432, 2.526) 1.559 (1.131, 2.078) 0.072
      PLR 107.797 (86.118, 134.303) 116.466 (105.208, 135.795) 0.278
      Abbreviation: BMI=body mass index; FVC=forced vital capacity; FEV1.0=forced expiratory volume in one second; WBC=white blood cell; NEU=neutrophil; LYM=lymphocyte; NLR=neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio; PLR=platelet to lymphocyte ratio; CWP=coal workers’pneumoconiosis.

      Table 1.  Characteristics of subjects.

      VOC CWP (n=42) Control (n=23)
      Iso-pentane* 1.93 (1.004, 3.910) 0.135 (0.069, 0.302)
      1-Pentene 0.152 (0.066, 0.541) 0.17 (0.127, 0.268)
      Pentane* 2.186 (1.325, 3.373) 0.072 (0.020, 0.180)
      Trans-2-Pentene 0.063 (0.063, 0.545) 0.063 (0.063, 0.141)
      Iso-prene* 145.904 (105.775, 188.798) 97.534 (63.288, 105.763)
      2,2-Dimethylbutane 13.513 (7.003, 20.313) 7.773 (6.345, 22.390)
      2-Methylpentane* 0.152 (0.063, 1.724) 0.063 (0.063, 0.133)
      3-Methylpentane* 0.511 (0.135, 2.756) 0.091 (0.012, 0.179)
      1-Hexene* 0.135 (0.078, 1.145) 0.078 (0.078, 0.254)
      Hexane* 1.104 (0.613, 5.399) 0.570 (0.014, 0.900)
      2,4-Dimethylpentane* 0.514 (0.176, 1.023) 1.619 (0.902, 2.187)
      Methyl-cyclopentane* 0.250 (0.104, 1.317) 0.105 (0.005, 0.235)
      2-Methylhexane 0.051 (0.051, 0.070) 0.061 (0.051, 0.086)
      Cyclohexane* 0.178 (0.005, 1.155) 0.005 (0.005, 0.025)
      2,3-Dimethylpentane 0.120 (0.012, 0.273) 0.043 (0.012, 0.156)
      3-Methylhexane 0.045 (0.045, 0.096) 0.196 (0.045, 0.309)
      2,2,4-Trimethylpentane 0.017 (0.017, 0.199) 0.017 (0.017, 0.030)
      Heptane 0.190 (0.129, 0.538) 0.283 (0.166, 1.324)
      Methylcyclohexane* 0.015 (0.005, 0.093) 0.088 (0.032, 0.135)
      Pentanal 0.381 (0.185, 1.195) 0.377 (0.181, 0.748)
      2,3,4-Trimethylpentane* 0.013 (0.013, 0.013) 0.022 (0.017, 0.027)
      2-Methylheptane* 0.039 (0.039, 0.039 0.343 (0.320, 0.442)
      3-Methylheptane 0.027 (0.027, 0.027) 0.027 (0.027, 0.027)
      4-Methyl-2-pentanone 0.003 (0.003, 3.278) 0.003 (0.003, 0.534)
      2-Hexanone* 0.013 (0.013, 0.045) 0.013 (0.013, 0.013)
      Hexanal 0.761 (0.369, 1.739) 0.726 (0.517, 0.990)
      Decane 0.065 (0.050, 0.187) 0.050 (0.050, 0.072)
      Abbreviation: VOC=volatile organic compounds; CWP=coal workers’ pneumoconiosis.
      * P<0.05.

      Table 2.  Quantitative values of VOCs in each group [Median (25th,75th percentile) ppb].

    • Principal component analysis (PCA), an unsupervised dimensionality reduction technique, was initially employed to visualize the overall data distribution across all samples. The analysis revealed distinct clustering between the pneumoconiosis and control groups based on exhaled VOCs profiles, though with some overlap (Figure 1A). Orthogonal Partial Least Squares-Discriminant Analysis (OPLS-DA), which excels at group discrimination by removing disease-irrelevant information while emphasizing disease-relevant features, demonstrated superior group separation (R2Y=0.867, Q2=0.826) as shown in Figure 1B. The model’s robustness was validated through 200 permutation tests (Figure 1C), yielding R2=(0.0, 0.102) and Q2=(0.0, −0.464), confirming both its validity and reliability.

      Figure 1. 

      Multivariate analysis model. (A) The mode of PCA between coal workers’ pneumoconiosis and control group; (B) The mode of OPLS-DA between coal workers’ pneumoconiosis and control group; (C) permutation tests of OPLS-DA models for coal workers’ pneumoconiosis and control group.Abbreviation: PCA=principal component analysis; OPLS-DA=orthogonal partial least squares-discriminant analysis.

    • Differential VOCs were identified using a multi-criteria approach combining VIP values, FC, and statistical significance. The screening criteria included VIP>1, FC>2 or <0.5, and P<0.05 (Supplementary Table S2). This analysis identified six differential VOCs: isopentane, n-pentane, 3-methylpentane, n-hexane, cyclohexane, and 2-methylheptane. Notably, 2-methylheptane maintained statistical significance (P<0.05) after age adjustment in the LASSO regression model.

      The diagnostic potential of each differential VOC for CWP was assessed using ROC curves. The AUC values were: isopentane 0.940 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.880, 1.000], n-pentane 0.996 (95% CI: 0.986, 1.000), 3-methylpentane 0.776 (95% CI: 0.663, 0.889), n-hexane 0.753 (95% CI: 0.634, 0.872), cyclohexane 0.777 (95% CI: 0.667, 0.888), and 2-methylheptane 0.948 (95% CI: 0.878, 1.000). The complete ROC curves and detailed analysis results are presented in Supplementary Figure S1 and Supplementary Table S3, respectively.

    • Correlation analysis revealed significant associations between the differential VOCs and pulmonary function parameters. Specifically, isopentane and n-pentane demonstrated negative correlations with both FVC (predicted %) and FEV1.0 (predicted %), while 2-methylheptane showed positive correlations with these same parameters (Supplementary Table S4). The relationships between isopentane, n-pentane, and 2-methylheptane versus FVC (predicted %) and FEV1.0 (predicted %) are visually represented in Figure 2.

      Figure 2. 

      Correlation scatterplot. (A) Correlation analysis of isopentane and FVC (pre%); (B) Correlation analysis of isopentane and FEV1.0(pre%); (C) Correlation analysis of pentane and FVC (pre%); (D) Correlation analysis of pentane and FEV1.0 (pre%); (E) Correlation analysis of 2-methylpentane and FVC (pre%); (F) Correlation analysis of 2-methylpentane and FEV1.0 (pre%).

      Abbreviation: FVC=forced vital capacity; FEV1.0=forced expiratory volume in one second.
    • In this study, we conducted targeted quantitative analysis using TD-GC-MS technology to analyze exhaled breath samples from 65 subjects. Our findings revealed distinct differences in VOC metabolism between CWP patients and healthy individuals, leading to the identification of six differential VOCs. ROC curve analysis demonstrated that these six VOCs effectively discriminated between the two groups.

      In the analysis, elevated isoprene concentrations were observed in the exhaled breath of the coal workers’ pneumoconiosis group. Foster (7) and colleagues demonstrated that increased exhaled isoprene may be associated with ROS-mediated oxidative stress, suggesting potentially elevated ROS levels in CWP patients. Similarly, pentane concentrations were significantly higher in the CWP group compared to controls. This finding aligns with Jalali (8) and colleagues’ research, which reported elevated exhaled pentane concentrations in workers exposed to crystalline silica dust, indicating increased oxidative damage to ω-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids in both dust-exposed and affected workers. Furthermore, we observed upregulation of five lipid peroxidation markers — isopentane, n-pentane, 3-methylpentane, n-hexane, and cyclohexane — in the CWP group, suggesting elevated oxidative stress levels. Notably, pentane and hexane have been previously identified as differential diagnostic markers for pneumoconiosis (9). The six differential VOCs identified in our study were all alkanes, consistent with these earlier findings.

      Furthermore, this study compared clinical indicators between populations and analyzed correlations between the six differential VOCs and clinical parameters. Notably, decreased forced vital capacity (FVC) has been associated with mortality in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) (10) and other forms of pulmonary fibrosis, making FVC a critical parameter for assessing disease status in patients with pulmonary fibrosis (11). Correlation analyses revealed that isopentane and n-pentane were negatively correlated with FVC and FEV1.0 levels, while 2-methylheptane showed positive correlations with both FVC and FEV1.0 levels (P<0.05), suggesting these three VOCs are associated with lung function decline. Importantly, the CWP group exhibited increased concentrations of isopentane and n-pentane and decreased concentrations of 2-methylheptane in exhaled breath, aligning with the correlation analyses and suggesting these three VOCs may serve as potential biomarkers for CWP.

      VOCs in the human body originate from both endogenous biochemical processes and environmental exposures, being released through various biological matrices including exhaled breath, urine, and skin (12). Exhalation represents the primary release pathway for VOCs in the human body, and its relationship to disease has garnered significant attention, particularly in lung pathologies (13). In our study, we identified six differential VOCs in exhaled breath. Analysis using the Human Metabolome Database (HMDB) revealed that cell membranes constitute a primary source for these compounds, with pentane, hexane, cyclohexane, and 2-methylheptane specifically identified as endogenous metabolites in exhaled breath. While the mechanisms underlying endogenous VOC production in human exhaled breath remain incompletely understood, elucidating these production pathways could provide crucial insights into the pathogenesis of coal workers’ pneumoconiosis (14).

      This study has several limitations: First, as an exploratory investigation with a relatively small sample size, future studies with larger cohorts are needed to validate our findings. Second, while previous research has identified methylated alkanes as characteristic VOCs of pneumoconiosis, age significantly influences methylated alkane levels (15). Although we included age as a covariate in our analyses, its precise impact on outcomes remains unclear. Future investigations should consider age-matched case-control populations to better control for age-related effects and ensure result reliability.

  • Conflict of interest: No conflicts of interest.
  • Reference (15)

    Citation:

    Catalog

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return