-
Pneumoconiosis, a lung disease primarily characterized by pulmonary fibrosis, occurs due to exposure to dust (1). Phospholipids are pivotal to numerous biological systems, contributing to the formation of cellular lipid bilayers and moderating a host of biological pathways. This moderation is accomplished through the release of signaling molecules such as lysophospholipids, platelet-activating factors, eicosanoids, and diacylglycerides. These molecules participate in the modulation of various processes, including cell proliferation, inflammation, oxidative stress, and neurotransmission, among others (2).
Lipidomics is a potentially useful technique for exploring lipid metabolism and metabolite-related biomarkers in complex respiratory diseases (1). Rindlisbacher et al. discovered lysophosphatidylcholines (Lyso PC), via ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography paired with high-resolution mass spectrometry (UHPLC-HRMS), that could serve as a potential biomarker in the serum of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) patients (3). Using a similar lipidomics analysis, Montesi et al. identified that 22∶4 lysophosphatidic acid (Lyso PA) was significantly elevated in the plasma and exhaled air condensate (EBC) of IPF patients, suggesting its potential as a biomarker for pulmonary fibrosis progression (4). In another study, Yan et al. pinpointed six potential biomarkers capable of distinguishing IPF patients from control subjects following untargeted lipidomics analysis (5). Peng et al., utilizing an analogous untargeted lipidomics technique on the serum of coal worker’ pneumoconiosis (CWP) patients, found differential metabolites in those exposed to coal dust and CWP patients, primarily related to glycerophospholipid metabolism (6). Further research has suggested a close relationship between phospholipid metabolism and the inflammatory process in pulmonary fibrosis (7).
Numerous targeted lipidomic studies suggest that pneumoconiosis could potentially alter the body’s phospholipid metabolism. Dysregulated phospholipids may engage in the pathogenesis of these diseases and could be significant biomarkers. In this study, we employed ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) for a targeted lipidomic analysis of the serum phospholipids from pneumoconiosis patients. The aim is to pave the way for new insights into potential lipid biomarkers for pneumoconiosis.
-
Table 1 outlines the characteristics of both the pilot and validation study subjects, all of whom were male. In the pilot study, the case and control groups had mean ages of 43.42 and 43.08 years respectively, and mean BMI (kg/m2) of 22.04 and 21.82 respectively. No statistically significant variances in age, BMI, or smoking status were observed between these two groups. Notably, the case group comprised of 18 silicosis and 6 CWP patients. This included 5 instances of stage I pneumoconiosis and 19 of stage III.
Demographic
characteristicsPilot study Validation study Cases (n=24) Controls (n=24) t/χ2 value P-value Cases (n=22) Controls (n=22) t/χ2 value P-value Male (n) 24 24 22 22 Age (years) 43.42±8.42 43.08±8.21 0.139 0.890 53.23±6.13 33.41±3.95 12.756 0.000 Smokers (%) 54.17 54.17 0.000 1.000 63.63 63.63 0.000 1.000 BMI (kg/m2) 22.04±2.42 21.82±2.45 0.325 0.747 21.08±2.28 24.66±2.53 −4.937 0.000 Table 1. Characteristics of the study subjects.
Regarding the validation study subjects, the case and the control groups reported contrasting mean ages, at 53.23 and 33.41 years respectively, and in their mean BMIs (kg/m2) of 21.08 and 24.66 respectively, establishing statistically substantial differences in both age and BMI. However, the smoking status between the two groups showed no significant statistical discrepancy. The case group consisted of 16 silicosis patients, 6 CWP patients, and this included 1 case of stage I pneumoconiosis, 1 case of stage II, and 20 cases of stage III pneumoconiosis.
-
The study performed quantitative analysis of 22 phospholipids present in the serum of 46 pneumoconiosis patients and 46 dust-exposed workers using UPLC-MS/MS methodology. Of these, 16 phospholipids were detected. The initial examination (Figure 1A–E) revealed substantial reductions in serum levels of 16:0 Lyso PC, 18:0–18:1 PG, 18:0–18:1 PE, 18:0 PE, and 18:1 Lyso PE within the case group compared to the control group; these reductions were statistically significant.
Figure 1.The univariate and multivariate analysis results between two groups. (A–E) The univariate statistical analysis results. (F) The mode of PCA between the two groups. (G) The mode of OPLS-DA between the two groups. (H) The permutation tests with 200 response sorting for the OPLS-DA model.
Notes: In panels A–E, the single dimensional statistical analysis results: Six differential PLs between the two groups. In panel F, R2X=0.655, Q2=0.197. “1” denotes the case group; “2” denotes the control group. In panel G, R2X=0.506, R2Y=0.499, Q2Y=0.409. “1” denotes the case group; “2” denotes the control group. In panel H, R2=(0.0, 0.164), Q2=(0.0, −0.269).
Abbreviation: Lyso PC=lysophosphatidylcholines; Lyso PE=lysophosphatidylethanolamine; PE=phosphatidylethanolamine; PG=phosphatidylglycerol.
* P<0.05.
-
The PCA highlighted a clear differentiation in serum phospholipids between the two groups, though some overlap was observed (Figure 1F). The OPLS-DA is a supervised pattern recognition approach. This analysis facilitated a distinct separation trend in serum phospholipids between the two groups, further emphasizing substantial differences in serum phospholipid metabolism profiles (Figure 1G). Permutation tests with 200 response permutations confirmed the robustness of the OPLS-DA model (Figure 1H). Notably, the VIP of 18∶0 PE, 18∶0–18∶1 PE, 18∶1 Lyso PE, 18∶0–18∶1 PG, 16∶0 PC, 16∶0–18∶1 PC, 18∶0 PC, and 18∶0–18∶1 PC all exceeded 1.
-
In the preliminary study, using the selection criteria of P<0.05 and VIP>1, four distinct phospholipids were identified: 18∶0 PE, 18∶0–18∶1 PE, 18∶1 Lyso PE, and 18∶0–18∶1 PG. Using pneumoconiosis patients as the dependent variable (where 0=dust-exposed workers, 1=pneumoconiosis patients) and important phospholipids with P<0.05 and VIP>1 (including 16∶0 Lyso PC, 16∶0 PC, 16∶0–18∶1 PC, 18∶0–18∶1 PC, 18∶0 PC, 18∶0 PE, 18∶0–18∶1 PE, 18∶1 Lyso PE, 18∶0 PA, and 18∶0–18∶1 PG) as independent variables, a binary logistic regression analysis was conducted. The resulting diagnostic model equation was Y=1.533+0.010X1−0.304X2, where X1 signifies the concentration of 16∶0 PC and X2 refers to the concentration of 18∶0 PE. Subsequently, an ROC curve analysis of the four distinct phospholipids and the diagnostic model was conducted to investigate their potential efficacy as lipid biomarkers. Notably, the area under the curve (AUC) of 18∶0 PE, 18∶0–18∶1 PE, and 18∶1 Lyso PE exceeded 0.7, indicating a substantial diagnostic value for pneumoconiosis. A diagnostic model with an AUC exceeding 0.8 suggested an enhanced diagnostic performance (Figure 2A, B, E).
Figure 2.The ROC curve analysis results for screening and validation of potential lipid biomarkers for pneumoconiosis. (A) ROC curve for significantly different phospholipids in the pilot study. (B) ROC curve for the diagnostic model in the pilot study. (C) ROC curve for 18∶0–18∶1 PE, 18∶0 PE, and 18∶1 Lyso PE in the validation study. (D) ROC curve for the diagnostic model in the validation study. (E) Results of ROC curve analysis.
Abbreviation: Lyso PE=lysophosphatidylethanolamine; PE=phosphatidylethanolamine; PG=phosphatidylglycerol; ROC=receiver operating characteristic; AUC=area under the curve.In the preliminary study, phospholipids and diagnostic models with AUC>0.7 were filtered, and their efficiency as potential lipid biomarkers was duly verified in the validation study. Our findings suggest that 18∶0 PE and 18∶1 Lyso PE exhibited an AUC<0.7, indicating a deficient ability to distinguish pneumoconiosis patients among healthy populations exposed to dust. Conversely, 18∶0–18∶1 PE and diagnostic model, which showed AUC>0.7, demonstrated substantial screening efficiency in the validation studies. These factors, therefore, may serve as potential lipid biomarkers in diagnosing pneumoconiosis (Figure 2C–E).
HTML
Subject
Univariate Statistical Analysis in the Pilot Study
Multivariate Statistical Analysis in the Pilot Study
Screening and Validation of Potential Lipid Biomarkers for Ppneumoconiosis
Citation: |