The outbreak occurred at a senior high school with a total of 576 students and 82 staff members. The index case was a 17-year-old female student in Grade 2 (equivalent to 11th Grade), who complained of left side chest pain while breathing since March 10, 2020, during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown, and was clinically diagnosed as TB pleurisy with left pleural effusion through chest X-ray on April 17 at a local TB designated hospital. Epidemiological investigation showed she stayed at home without going out from January 15 to the onset date because of the COVID-19 pandemic and community lockdown and had no history of TB clinical symptoms in the previous semester.
Close contact screening was first performed in the household of the index case. Household contacts including parents were excluded for TB because of lack of clinical symptoms and had negative laboratory test results. Then, TB screening was performed among classmates and faculty who shared a classroom with the index case according to the National Norms of Tuberculosis Prevention and Control in School (2017) (1). As a result, 20 out of 82 students (24.4%) and 1 of 9 faculty (11.11%) had strong positive purified protein derivatives tuberculosis (PPD) with tuberculin skin test (TST) without difference (Fisher’s exact: 1 tailed P=0.336). Among 20 strong positive PPD students, further GeneXpert and anti-TB drug sensitivity test (DST) indicated 4 were active pulmonary TB including 1 MDR-TB resistant to rifampin (R), isoniazid (H), and ofloxacin (O); 1 RR-TB (GeneXpert MTB/RIF positive with negative culture result); and 2 clinically-diagnosed TB. The rest of the faculty (n=1) and students (n=16) with strong positive PPD were diagnosed as latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). All TB cases in this outbreak were diagnosed and classified according to the national TB diagnosis and classification standards (2-3). The screening was expanded to students and faculty members who have classrooms on the same floor with the TB cases, and 1 out of the 78 students (1.3%) was diagnosed as LTBI (Figure 1).
The total attack rate among students after close contact screening was 2.5% (4/160) for active TB cases, 13.1% (21/160) for strong positive PPD, and 10.6% (17/160) for LTBI cases. For students sharing the same classroom with the index-case, the attack rate was 4.9% (4/82) for active TB cases, 24.4% (20/82) for strong positive PPD, and 19.5% (16/82) for LTBI cases. The risk ratio (RR) of being strong positive PPD and LTBI in the shared classroom with the index case was 19 and 15 times higher, respectively, than that of students who did not share the same classroom as the index patient. No active TB cases were identified in students who did not share the same classroom with index-case on the same floor.
Epidemiological investigation showed these 4 additional active TB cases, identified among students who shared the same classroom with the index case, stayed at home and scarcely went out from January 15 to May 17 (TB screening began) because of the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. Among these 4 additional active TB cases, the MDR-TB student patient experienced a chronic cough for a half year since late November 2019 and had attended school for 2 months since she became ill until the school holiday on January 15, 2020. She did not declare illness in the school or visite a doctor, but only self-medicated by using common cough medicine. Retrospective investigation in her family showed that her father had a TB history for 14 years with 3 recorded times of hospital TB treatment records before the current investigation (2007, 2011, and 2013). He was eventually diagnosed as an MDR-TB case with the same drug resistance (R, H, and O resistant) in later May 2020. When investigating the TB-related knowledge in this family, members showed poor awareness about TB transmission and the potential threats.
The MDR-TB student had clinical symptoms earlier than the index case and was likely the most probable initial case in her class. She had a cough for 2 months since November 2019 while attending school. From November 2019 to January 2020, it was winter and the local temperature ranged from 1 to 10 ℃. During the wintertime, the school used air conditioning units to heat classrooms and rarely opened doors and windows for ventilation, which might have promoted the spread of mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) in the classroom. The school also failed on routine prevention and control measures such as morning and noon inspection of students for illnesses. The teachers and students did not have strong knowledge on suspected TB symptoms, which delayed detection and treatment.
All active TB cases were treated and managed by municipal and provincial expert groups, and suspension and resumption of school attendance were implemented according to national guidelines (1). All contacts with strong positive PPD reactions and normal chest X-ray results were routinely monitored and given chest X-ray reexaminations at 3, 6, and 12 month follow-ups. The results of follow-up checks showed that students and staff with strong positive of PPD had not developed any active TB as of June 15, 2021.