Commentary: Achieving the Goals of Healthy China 2030 Depends on Increasing Smoking Cessation in China: Comparative Findings from the ITC Project in China, Japan, and the Republic of Korea

The International Tobacco Control (ITC) Policy Evaluation Project examined indicators of progress on cessation in China in comparison with two other ITC East Asian countries — the Republic of Korea and Japan — based on data from the most recent ITC cohort surveys of smokers [China (2013–2015); Republic of Korea and Japan (2020)]. Extensive information about the methods of the ITC cohort surveys are available elsewhere (12-15). Briefly, the ITC China Survey was conducted among 7,817 adult smokers selected using a multistage probability sample in 10 locations in China: 5 cities (Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Kunming, Shenyang) and 5 rural areas (Changzhi, Huzhou, Tongren, Xining, Yichun). The Republic of Korea web-administered cohort survey was conducted among 3,766 adult smokers from a national survey panel. The Japan web-administered cohort survey was conducted among 2,757 adult smokers from a national survey panel. Table 1 presents the smoking prevalence of the three countries over time.

ITC cohort surveys asked smokers if they are planning to quit smoking, and if so, their timeframe (next month, next six months, beyond six months). Intentions to quit is a strong predictor of future quit attempts and success. In China, for example, smokers reporting having plans to quit smoking were much more likely than smokers having no plans to quit to report 18 months later that they had attempted to quit (41% vs. 17%) (20).

Figure 1 presents the percentage of smokers who intend to quit within the next six months at the most recent ITC cohort survey wave in China, Japan, and the Republic of Korea. The majority of Chinese smokers do not have intentions to quit smoking in the near future. However, a higher percentage of smokers in China (28%) and the Republic of Korea (31%) plan to quit in the next six months compared to only 11% of smokers in Japan.

Figure 1. 

Percentage of smokers who intend to quit in the next six months and who made a quit attempt in the past year, by country.

Smokers were also asked about their previous quit attempts. The majority of Chinese smokers reported that they made no attempts to quit smoking in the last year. Approximately 1 in 5 Chinese smokers made attempts to quit (19%), compared to approximately half of smokers in the Republic of Korea (50%) and Japan (54%) (Figure 1).

The gap between intentions to quit and actual quit attempts is striking in China versus its two neighboring countries. Chinese smokers intend to quit at nearly the same proportion (28%) as Korean smokers (31%), both much higher than Japanese smokers (11%). But Chinese smokers are much less likely to actually attempt to quit (19%) compared to Japanese smokers (54%) and Korean smokers (50%). This suggests that Chinese smokers recognize the importance of quitting and want to quit, but these intentions are much less likely to be translated into action. This suggests the importance in China of encouraging and supporting smokers to quit, which is precisely the objective of FCTC Article 14.

Physicians and other health professionals are an important source of information and motivation for smokers to quit: even very brief advice from physicians can lead to a 1 to 3 percentage point increase in cessation rates (21). ITC Surveys asked smokers whether they had visited a physician or other health professional in the last six months and if they received advice to quit smoking during any visit. In China, 56% of smokers who visited a physician or health professional received advice to quit compared to 74% in the Republic of Korea, both significantly higher than 22% of smokers in Japan. In China, there is tremendous room for improvement since 44% of Chinese smokers did NOT receive critically important quit advice from their physician/health professional. This is an even greater need in Japan, where over three-quarters of smokers received no such advice.

Figure 2 shows that Chinese smokers were more likely to agree that the government should do more to control smoking (80%), compared to 60% of Korean smokers and 25% of Japanese smokers. Chinese smokers were also much more likely to support a total ban if they received government support to quit (83%) than Korean smokers (42%) and Japanese smokers (29%).

Figure 2. 

Percentage of smokers who support more government action to reduce the harm of cigarettes and who support a total ban on tobacco products within 10 years.

These findings demonstrate that smokers in China very much want to quit, and they support stronger action of the government to help them quit, compared to smokers in the Republic of Korea and Japan. For World No Tobacco Day in 2021, WHO calls on governments to ensure that their citizens have access to brief advice, toll-free quit lines, mobile and digital cessation services, nicotine replacement therapies, and other supports for quitting.

It should be noted, as a limitation, that this study compared data collected in China in 2013–2015 with data collected in 2020 in Japan and the Republic of Korea. Tobacco control efforts at the city level have been reported to improve in China since that time, but that would likely have only increased the level of support among smokers for stronger tobacco control action, thus making any claims that the Chinese people would not support stronger policies even less valid.

China’s smoking pandemic has likely not yet peaked in its devastation since the consequences of smoking are experienced in disease and death at a lag of many years (22). China has recognized the dire future consequences of smoking and has, in its Healthy China 2030 Plan, committed to reduce its smoking prevalence from 26.6% in 2018 to below 20% in 2030. This study’s findings demonstrate that it is important for the Chinese government to strengthen and accelerate actions to achieve this objective and to implement Article 14 as well as other important measures that have been proven to be effective including large pictorial health warnings (Article 11), price and tax increases (Article 6), a comprehensive smoke-free law (Article 8), education campaigns (Article 12) and bans on tobacco advertising and promotion (Article 13).

Despite the clear need for China to implement strong FCTC policies from analyses suggesting that implementing those policies would lead to substantial declines in smoking prevalence (5) at levels that would achieve the Healthy China 2030 objective (7), and despite the fact that Chinese smokers themselves would support strong implementation, there has been insufficient progress in tobacco control in China. Although there are widespread cultural practices, for example, sharing or gifting cigarettes, that help to sustain and normalize smoking (23-24), the tobacco industry’s influence is the most important barrier to stronger tobacco control in China (25), as it is in Japan (26), and globally, especially in low- and middle-income countries (27). Once again, China is at the crossroads (28).

Acknowledgement: Eunice Ofeibea Indome, Ph.D., of the ITC Project, University of Waterloo.

Statement of Interests: Geoffrey T. Fong has been an expert witness or consultant on behalf of governments in litigation involving the tobacco industry. All other authors have no conflicts of interests to declare.