Advanced Search

Preplanned Studies: Spatial Distribution and Clustering Patterns of Cognitive Impairment Among the Older Population — 31 PLADs, China, 2024

View author affiliations
  • Summary

    What is already known about this topic?

    As the Chinese population ages, the prevalence of cognitive impairment among older adults continues to increase. Cognitive impairment severely restricts daily activities and creates significant social and economic burdens.

    What is added by this report?

    Using nationally representative data from the China Survey of Aging and Health (CAHS), this study found that the weighted prevalence of subjective cognitive decline and mild cognitive impairment among individuals aged 65 years and older in China was 38.8% and 28.4% in 2024, respectively, and both showed spatial clustering.

    What are the implications for public health practice?

    Through the analysis of spatial distribution patterns and identification of high-risk regions of cognitive impairment, this study provides critical information for developing targeted regional prevention and control interventions.

  • loading...
  • Conflicts of interest: No conflict of interest.
  • Funding: Supported by the National Key R&D Plan “Intergovernmental International Science and Technology Innovation Cooperation” Key Special Project (2021YFE0111800)
  • [1] Jia LF, Quan MN, Fu Y, Zhao T, Li Y, Wei CB, et al. Dementia in China: epidemiology, clinical management, and research advances. Lancet Neurol 2020;19(1):81 − 92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30290-XCrossRef
    [2] Guan H, Yue L, Yap PT, Xiao SF, Bozoki A, Liu MX. Attention-guided autoencoder for automated progression prediction of subjective cognitive decline with structural MRI. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 2023;27(6):2980 − 9. https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2023.3257081CrossRef
    [3] Jia LF, Du YF, Chu L, Zhang ZJ, Li FY, Lyu DY, et al. Prevalence, risk factors, and management of dementia and mild cognitive impairment in adults aged 60 years or older in China: a cross-sectional study. Lancet Public Health 2020;5(12):e661 − 71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30185-7CrossRef
    [4] Liu D, Li L, An LN, Cheng GR, Chen C, Zou MJ, et al. Urban-rural disparities in mild cognitive impairment and its functional subtypes among community-dwelling older residents in central China. Gen Psychiatr 2021;34(5):e100564. https://doi.org/10.1136/gpsych-2021-100564CrossRef
    [5] Wang XQ, Huang WJ, Su L, Xing Y, Jessen F, Sun Y, et al. Neuroimaging advances regarding subjective cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Neurodegener 2020;15(1):55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13024-020-00395-3CrossRef
    [6] Chen HH, Sun FJ, Yeh TL, Liu HE, Huang HL, Kuo BIT, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of the Ascertain Dementia 8 questionnaire for detecting cognitive impairment in primary care in the community, clinics and hospitals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fam Pract 2018;35(3):239 − 46. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmx098CrossRef
    [7] Su R, Jia SR, Zhang NN, Wang YY, Li H, Zhang DL, et al. The effects of long-term high-altitude exposure on cognition: a meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2024;161:105682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105682CrossRef
    [8] Burtscher J, Mallet RT, Burtscher M, Millet GP. Hypoxia and brain aging: neurodegeneration or neuroprotection? Ageing Res Rev 2021;68:101343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2021.101343.
    [9] Nemy M, Dyrba M, Brosseron F, Buerger K, Dechent P, Dobisch L, et al. Cholinergic white matter pathways along the Alzheimer’s disease continuum. Brain 2023;146(5):2075 − 88. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awac385CrossRef
    [10] Kulshreshtha A, Parker ES, Fowler NR, Summanwar D, Ben Miled Z, Owora AH, et al. Prevalence of unrecognized cognitive impairment in federally qualified health centers. JAMA Netw Open 2024;7(10):e2440411. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.40411CrossRef
  • TABLE 1.  Demographic distribution of subjective cognitive decline and mild cognitive impairment among adults aged 65 years and older population in 31 PLADs, China, 2024.

    Characteristics Participants
    N (%)
    Subjective Cognitive Decline Mild Cognitive Impairment
    Weighted % (95% CI) P Weighted % (95% CI) P
    Total 41,859 (100.0) 38.8 (35.7, 42.1) 28.4 (25.3, 31.6)
    Region <0.001 <0.001
    Eastern 16,795 (40.1) 33.5 (28.5, 39.0) 27.7 (21.7, 34.5)
    Central 11,462 (27.4) 41.5 (35.7, 47.6) 31.0 (26.3, 36.2)
    Western 10,115 (24.2) 45.1 (39.0, 51.3) 28.4 (23.8, 33.6)
    Northeastern 3,487 (8.3) 37.1 (29.1, 45.9) 24.6 (18.9, 31.4)
    Sex <0.001 <0.001
    Male 19,893 (47.5) 37.8 (33.4, 42.4) 28.3 (23.6, 33.6)
    Female 21,966 (52.5) 39.7 (35.6, 44.0) 28.4 (24.7, 32.4)
    Age (years) <0.001 <0.001
    65−69 12,518 (29.9) 33.9 (28.7, 39.6) 23.8 (19.2, 29.1)
    70−74 12,794 (30.6) 35.7 (30.2, 41.6) 23.5 (19.2, 28.4)
    75−79 8,001 (19.1) 44.3 (38.2, 50.6) 30.3 (25.0, 36.3)
    ≥80 8,546 (20.4) 46.3 (39.0, 53.8) 40.3 (32.3, 48.9)
    Area type <0.001 <0.001
    Urban 25,553 (61.1) 37.1 (33.1, 41.1) 25.1 (21.8, 28.6)
    Rural 16,306 (38.9) 41.7 (36.4, 47.2) 33.8 (28.0, 40.0)
    Education <0.001 <0.001
    Primary school or less 22,475 (53.7) 42.7 (37.9, 47.6) 34.1 (29.1, 39.4)
    Secondary school 10,402 (24.8) 35.7 (30.6, 41.2) 22.7 (18.8, 27.3)
    High school and above 8,982 (21.5) 33.9 (28.6, 39.6) 21.9 (17.4, 27.2)
    BMI (kg/m2) 0.004 0.065
    <18.5 1,920 (4.6) 42.8 (30.8, 55.8) 34.7 (23.9, 47.4)
    18.5−24.9 27,769 (66.3) 36.9 (33.2, 40.7) 27.3 (23.6, 31.4)
    25.0−29.9 10,765 (25.7) 42.0 (35.6, 48.6) 29.3 (23.7, 35.6)
    ≥30.0 1,405 (3.4) 45.2 (30.0, 61.3) 32.2 (19.6, 48.1)
    Monthly household income (CNY) <0.001 <0.001
    <3,000 11,437 (27.3) 42.3 (35.9, 49.0) 30.3 (25.0, 36.3)
    3,000−5,999 11,468 (27.4) 38.4 (32.9, 44.1) 26.3 (21.0, 32.4)
    6,000−9,999 7,989 (19.1) 37.2 (31.8, 42.9) 25.0 (20.2, 30.5)
    ≥10,000 4,703 (11.2) 33.6 (27.1, 40.8) 25.8 (20.0, 32.6)
    Unwilling to disclose 6,262 (15.0) 41.8 (31.1, 53.4) 37.4 (24.8, 51.9)
    Abbreviation: PLADs=provincial-level administrative divisions; BMI=body mass index; CNY=Chinese Yuan; CI=confidence interval.
    Download: CSV

    TABLE 2.  Prevalence and clustering patterns of subjective cognitive decline among adults aged 65 years and older across 31 PLADs, China, 2024.

    PLADs Sample size, N (%) Weighted prevalence (%) Z Score P Clustering patterns
    Hainan 199 (0.5) 23.6 (7.4, 54.3) 0.968 0.176
    Guangdong 2,063 (4.9) 24.9 (14.2, 40.0) 1.052 0.160
    Beijing 1,216 (2.9) 26.1 (19.6, 34.0) 0.844 0.208
    Tianjin 453 (1.1) 26.4 (17.4, 38.0) 1.011 0.164
    Liaoning 1,639 (3.9) 27.0 (12.8, 48.4) 1.633 0.050 LL
    Zhejiang 1,775 (4.2) 28.1 (14.2, 47.8) −0.052 0.500
    Jilin 802 (1.9) 29.0 (20.4, 39.5) 1.264 0.098
    Guangxi 1,372 (3.3) 29.8 (17.6, 45.7) 0.479 0.342
    Henan 3,342 (8.0) 35.7 (26.4, 46.1) −0.852 0.212
    Jiangxi 1,031 (2.4) 36.7 (26.3, 48.7) 0.199 0.418
    Chongqing 1,124 (2.7) 36.9 (21.7, 55.1) −1.625 0.058
    Inner Mongolia 661 (1.6) 38.6 (17.6, 65.0) 1.331 0.102
    Fujian 899 (2.1) 38.7 (24.2, 55.5) 1.203 0.118
    Hebei 2,394 (5.7) 38.7 (29.3, 49.1) 1.796 0.018 LL
    Jiangsu 2,746 (6.6) 39.8 (26.4, 55.0) 0.221 0.418
    Hunan 2,619 (6.3) 40.2 (24.6, 58.0) 0.271 0.396
    Ningxia 150 (0.4) 40.7 (24.2, 59.6) 2.118 0.014 HH
    Yunnan 1,027 (2.4) 41.5 (17.2, 70.9) 0.304 0.376
    Shanxi 903 (2.2) 42.6 (26.2, 60.8) −0.016 0.498
    Xizang 41 (0.1) 43.1 (25.2, 63.0) 2.818 0.006 HH
    Sichuan 2,672 (6.4) 43.2 (28.8, 58.9) 2.290 0.016 HH
    Shandong 3,104 (7.4) 44.2 (28.1, 61.7) −1.252 0.108
    Shanghai 1,946 (4.6) 45.1 (33.6, 57.1) −0.909 0.192
    Anhui 1,805 (4.3) 45.6 (37.5, 53.9) −0.666 0.254
    Heilongjiang 1,046 (2.5) 48.2 (37.6, 58.9) −1.578 0.050 HL
    Xinjiang 408 (1.0) 48.9 (40.7, 57.3) 0.256 0.370
    Hubei 1,762 (4.2) 49.8 (32.3, 67.4) −0.240 0.404
    Gansu 624 (1.5) 51.5 (27.9, 74.5) 2.754 0.010 HH
    Guizhou 866 (2.1) 55.3 (40.3, 69,3) −0.546 0.298
    Shaanxi 1,046 (2.5) 62.6 (53.0, 71.3) 0.580 0.294
    Qinghai 124 (0.3) 72.4 (55.1, 84.9) 1.307 0.094
    Abbreviation: HH=high-high; LH=low-high; LL=low-low; HL=high-low; PLADs=provincial-level administrative divisions.
    Download: CSV

    TABLE 3.  Prevalence and clustering patterns of mild cognitive impairment among adults aged 65 years and older across 31 PLADs, China, 2024.

    PLADs Sample size, N (%) Weighted prevalence (%) Z Score P Clustering patterns
    Tianjin 453 (1.1) 12.3 (4.4, 29.8) −0.845 0.214
    Hainan 199 (0.5) 16.1 (4.6, 43.1) 0.120 0.418
    Xizang 41 (0.1) 17.2 (8.6, 31.5) 0.637 0.290
    Ningxia 150 (0.4) 19.4 (14.4, 25.5) 0.357 0.410
    Jiangsu 2,746 (6.6) 19.4 (11.3, 31.3) 1.114 0.134
    Liaoning 1,639 (3.9) 20.1 (9.2, 38.4) −0.566 0.264
    Jilin 802 (1.9) 20.8 (14.7, 28.6) 0.973 0.170
    Beijing 1,216 (2.9) 20.8 (12.4, 32.8) 0.264 0.384
    Zhejiang 1,775 (4.2) 21.1 (9.6, 40.2) −0.817 0.210
    Inner Mongolia 661 (1.6) 21.9 (8.6, 45.7) 0.751 0.214
    Sichuan 2,672 (6.4) 22.5 (12.7, 36.6) −0.990 0.170
    Chongqing 1,124 (2.7) 23.5 (11.7, 41.6) 0.757 0.238
    Henan 3,342 (8.0) 24.2 (17.2, 32.7) −0.130 0.418
    Yunnan 1,027 (2.4) 25.2 (10.0, 50.5) −1.429 0.050 HL
    Gansu 624 (1.5) 26.4 (14.3, 43.5) −0.968 0.164
    Fujian 899 (2.1) 27.3 (13.8, 46.7) 0.609 0.254
    Hubei 1,762 (4.2) 28.4 (15.4, 46.4) −0.953 0.170
    Hunan 2,619 (6.3) 28.7 (18.2, 42.0) −0.192 0.384
    Guangxi 1,372 (3.3) 28.9 (15.9, 46.8) −0.755 0.248
    Hebei 2,394 (5.7) 29.2 (22.3, 37.1) −3.135 0.004 LH
    Jiangxi 1,031 (2.4) 29.6 (20.3, 41.0) −0.946 0.186
    Shanghai 1,946 (4.6) 29.6 (17.3, 45.8) −1.225 0.098
    Heilongjiang 1,046 (2.5) 29.7 (21.0, 40.3) −0.265 0.426
    Guangdong 2,063 (4.9) 34.6 (17.3, 57.2) −0.261 0.426
    Shaanxi 1,046 (2.5) 35.9 (28.2, 44.3) −1.120 0.120
    Xinjiang 408 (1.0) 36.6 (29.4, 44.4) −1.134 0.060
    Guizhou 866 (2.1) 38.9 (26.6, 52.7) 0.466 0.330
    Shanxi 903 (2.2) 40.7 (25.3, 58.3) −1.804 0.054
    Anhui 1,805 (4.3) 41.2 (31.1, 52.2) −0.345 0.418
    Shandong 3,104 (7.4) 42.7 (25.6, 61.7) −0.186 0.450
    Qinghai 124 (0.3) 58.9 (38.7, 76.4) −1.254 0.102
    Abbreviation: HL=high-low; LH=low-high; PLADs=provincial-level administrative divisions.
    Download: CSV

Citation:

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents

Article Metrics

Article views(276) PDF downloads(2) Cited by()

Share

Related

Spatial Distribution and Clustering Patterns of Cognitive Impairment Among the Older Population — 31 PLADs, China, 2024

View author affiliations

Summary

What is already known about this topic?

As the Chinese population ages, the prevalence of cognitive impairment among older adults continues to increase. Cognitive impairment severely restricts daily activities and creates significant social and economic burdens.

What is added by this report?

Using nationally representative data from the China Survey of Aging and Health (CAHS), this study found that the weighted prevalence of subjective cognitive decline and mild cognitive impairment among individuals aged 65 years and older in China was 38.8% and 28.4% in 2024, respectively, and both showed spatial clustering.

What are the implications for public health practice?

Through the analysis of spatial distribution patterns and identification of high-risk regions of cognitive impairment, this study provides critical information for developing targeted regional prevention and control interventions.

  • 1. Tobacco Control Office, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China
  • 2. Department of Geriatrics, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology; Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
  • 3. The Key Laboratory of Geriatrics, Beijing Institute of Geriatrics, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, National Health Commission; Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
  • 4. Department of Geriatrics, Huashan Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Aging and Medicine, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
  • 5. Department of Geriatrics, Medical Center on Aging of Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
  • Corresponding authors:

    Shiwei Liu, liusw@chinacdc.cn

    Hong Shi, shihong2584@bjhmoh.cn

  • Funding: Supported by the National Key R&D Plan “Intergovernmental International Science and Technology Innovation Cooperation” Key Special Project (2021YFE0111800)
  • Online Date: October 10 2025
    Issue Date: October 10 2025
    doi: 10.46234/ccdcw2025.219
    • Introduction: Cognitive impairment poses a serious threat to the health of older adults. Understanding spatial distribution patterns and identifying high-risk areas are essential for developing targeted regional prevention and control strategies. This study examined the spatial distribution and clustering patterns of cognitive impairment in China in 2024.

      Methods: This study utilized data from the 2024 China Survey of Aging and Health. Rao-Scott chi-square tests were used to compare differences in prevalence across demographic subgroups. Global and local spatial autocorrelation analyses were conducted to examine the spatial distribution patterns and clustering characteristics.

      Results: In 2024, the prevalence of subjective cognitive decline (SCD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) among older adults ≥65 years in China was 38.8% and 28.4%, respectively. The prevalence of SCD was highest in western China (45.1%), while MCI was highest in central China (31.0%). Global spatial autocorrelation analysis revealed that SCD (P=0.025) and MCI (P=0.015) distribution exhibited spatial clustering across China.

      Conclusions: The current burden of cognitive impairment in China’s older population is substantial and characterized by significant regional variations. Prevention and treatment measures should prioritize support for high-prevalence areas with limited resources and promote scientifically based, precise, and efficient cognitive impairment prevention and treatment strategies throughout China.

    • Cognitive impairment is a cardinal manifestation of neurodegenerative disorders, including Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other dementia syndromes (1). Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) is a preclinical stage of AD, with progressive SCD potentially advancing to mild cognitive impairment (MCI), which carries an elevated risk of further progression to AD (2). Current research indicates that approximately 15.07 million individuals >60 years in China live with dementia (3). An epidemiological study conducted from 2018 to 2019 documented an MCI prevalence rate of 27.8% among individuals ≥65 years (4). This study utilized data from the China Survey of Aging and Health (CAHS) to examine the prevalence of cognitive impairment among adults aged ≥65 years throughout China. Through a systematic analysis of spatial distribution patterns and identification of high-risk geographic regions, this study aimed to inform the development of targeted regional prevention and intervention strategies.

      The CAHS utilized a multistage stratified cluster sampling design across all 31 provincial-level administrative divisions (PLADs) in China. This study utilized probability proportional-to-size sampling to ensure both national and provincial representativeness. The sampling framework comprises three sequential stages. First, the required sample size for each PLAD was calculated based on the standardized age distribution and sex ratio of the older population. Second, two to three representative survey cities were selected from each PLAD based on prefecture-level city gross domestic product rankings (with municipalities required to include two urban and two suburban districts); each prefecture-level city contributed a minimum of two districts or counties representing medium development levels, with each district providing two communities for survey participation. The CAHS successfully recruited 49,193 individuals aged ≥65 years. After implementing rigorous onsite quality control measures and comprehensive data cleaning procedures, 41,859 valid questionnaires were included in the final analysis, yielding an overall response rate of 85.1%. The Beijing Hospital Ethics Committee approved the study protocol (approval number: 2021BJYEC-114-01), and informed consent was obtained from all participants.

      The CAHS utilized the Subjective Cognitive Decline Nine-item Questionnaire to assess patients’ subjective experience of cognitive decline, despite objective test performance remaining within normal ranges for their age and education level, without meeting the criteria for MCI or dementia (5). Additionally, the Ascertain Dementia Eight-item Questionnaire demonstrates high sensitivity and specificity in identifying initial cognitive changes associated with various types of dementia, including AD, vascular dementia, dementia with Lewy bodies, and frontotemporal dementia, while remaining unaffected by age, education, or cultural differences (6).

      Statistical analyses included sampling design, non-response adjustment, and post-stratification correction weights to ensure population representativeness. We computed prevalence estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using survey-weighted methods and evaluated subgroup disparities through Rao-Scott χ2 tests. All descriptive analyses were conducted using STATA (version 18.0; StataCorp LLC, College Station, Texas, USA). We used ArcGIS (version 10.8.1; Environmental Systems Research Institute, California, USA) to conduct spatial distribution and clustering pattern analyses. The spatial weights matrix was defined using the “Inverse Distance” method for conceptualizing spatial relationships, with the distance method set to the default “Euclidean_Distance” and the standardization method set to “ROW.” Using PLADs as spatial analysis units, we employed global spatial autocorrelation analysis to assess the overall spatial aggregation of cognitive impairment across the 31 PLADs. We used local spatial autocorrelation analyses to identify clustering patterns, categorizing the regions into four distinct types: high-high, low-high, low-low, and high-low aggregation areas. Statistical significance was set at P<0.05.

      In 2024, the weighted prevalence of SCD and MCI among older adults aged ≥65 years in China was 38.8% and 28.4%, respectively. SCD prevalence was highest in western China (45.1%), whereas that of MCI peaked in central China (31.0%). Females demonstrated higher prevalence rates for both conditions (39.7% and 28.4%, respectively) than males (37.8% and 28.3%, respectively). Rural areas consistently exceeded urban areas in terms of the prevalence rates (41.7% vs. 37.1% for SCD and 33.8% vs. 25.1% for MCI). Adults aged ≥80 years exhibited the highest prevalence rates for both SCD (46.3%) and MCI (40.3%). Higher educational attainment demonstrated a significant inverse association between SCD prevalence and MCI incidence rates. When body mass index fell within the normal range of 18.5–24.9 kg/m2, the prevalence of SCD was lowest (36.9%) (Table 1).

      Characteristics Participants
      N (%)
      Subjective Cognitive Decline Mild Cognitive Impairment
      Weighted % (95% CI) P Weighted % (95% CI) P
      Total 41,859 (100.0) 38.8 (35.7, 42.1) 28.4 (25.3, 31.6)
      Region <0.001 <0.001
      Eastern 16,795 (40.1) 33.5 (28.5, 39.0) 27.7 (21.7, 34.5)
      Central 11,462 (27.4) 41.5 (35.7, 47.6) 31.0 (26.3, 36.2)
      Western 10,115 (24.2) 45.1 (39.0, 51.3) 28.4 (23.8, 33.6)
      Northeastern 3,487 (8.3) 37.1 (29.1, 45.9) 24.6 (18.9, 31.4)
      Sex <0.001 <0.001
      Male 19,893 (47.5) 37.8 (33.4, 42.4) 28.3 (23.6, 33.6)
      Female 21,966 (52.5) 39.7 (35.6, 44.0) 28.4 (24.7, 32.4)
      Age (years) <0.001 <0.001
      65−69 12,518 (29.9) 33.9 (28.7, 39.6) 23.8 (19.2, 29.1)
      70−74 12,794 (30.6) 35.7 (30.2, 41.6) 23.5 (19.2, 28.4)
      75−79 8,001 (19.1) 44.3 (38.2, 50.6) 30.3 (25.0, 36.3)
      ≥80 8,546 (20.4) 46.3 (39.0, 53.8) 40.3 (32.3, 48.9)
      Area type <0.001 <0.001
      Urban 25,553 (61.1) 37.1 (33.1, 41.1) 25.1 (21.8, 28.6)
      Rural 16,306 (38.9) 41.7 (36.4, 47.2) 33.8 (28.0, 40.0)
      Education <0.001 <0.001
      Primary school or less 22,475 (53.7) 42.7 (37.9, 47.6) 34.1 (29.1, 39.4)
      Secondary school 10,402 (24.8) 35.7 (30.6, 41.2) 22.7 (18.8, 27.3)
      High school and above 8,982 (21.5) 33.9 (28.6, 39.6) 21.9 (17.4, 27.2)
      BMI (kg/m2) 0.004 0.065
      <18.5 1,920 (4.6) 42.8 (30.8, 55.8) 34.7 (23.9, 47.4)
      18.5−24.9 27,769 (66.3) 36.9 (33.2, 40.7) 27.3 (23.6, 31.4)
      25.0−29.9 10,765 (25.7) 42.0 (35.6, 48.6) 29.3 (23.7, 35.6)
      ≥30.0 1,405 (3.4) 45.2 (30.0, 61.3) 32.2 (19.6, 48.1)
      Monthly household income (CNY) <0.001 <0.001
      <3,000 11,437 (27.3) 42.3 (35.9, 49.0) 30.3 (25.0, 36.3)
      3,000−5,999 11,468 (27.4) 38.4 (32.9, 44.1) 26.3 (21.0, 32.4)
      6,000−9,999 7,989 (19.1) 37.2 (31.8, 42.9) 25.0 (20.2, 30.5)
      ≥10,000 4,703 (11.2) 33.6 (27.1, 40.8) 25.8 (20.0, 32.6)
      Unwilling to disclose 6,262 (15.0) 41.8 (31.1, 53.4) 37.4 (24.8, 51.9)
      Abbreviation: PLADs=provincial-level administrative divisions; BMI=body mass index; CNY=Chinese Yuan; CI=confidence interval.

      Table 1.  Demographic distribution of subjective cognitive decline and mild cognitive impairment among adults aged 65 years and older population in 31 PLADs, China, 2024.

      In 2024, SCD prevalence among adults aged ≥65 years across China’s 31 PLADs ranged from 23.6% (Hainan) to 72.4% (Qinghai). Global spatial autocorrelation analysis revealed that the distribution of SCD exhibits spatial clustering across China (Moran’s I=0.162, Z=2.242, P=0.025). Local spatial autocorrelation analysis identified distinct clustering patterns: high-high clustering areas: Ningxia, Xizang, Sichuan, and Gansu; low-low clustering areas: Liaoning and Hebei; high-low clustering area: Heilongjiang. The geographic distribution revealed that SCD among older adults is predominantly concentrated in China’s western regions (Table 2).

      PLADs Sample size, N (%) Weighted prevalence (%) Z Score P Clustering patterns
      Hainan 199 (0.5) 23.6 (7.4, 54.3) 0.968 0.176
      Guangdong 2,063 (4.9) 24.9 (14.2, 40.0) 1.052 0.160
      Beijing 1,216 (2.9) 26.1 (19.6, 34.0) 0.844 0.208
      Tianjin 453 (1.1) 26.4 (17.4, 38.0) 1.011 0.164
      Liaoning 1,639 (3.9) 27.0 (12.8, 48.4) 1.633 0.050 LL
      Zhejiang 1,775 (4.2) 28.1 (14.2, 47.8) −0.052 0.500
      Jilin 802 (1.9) 29.0 (20.4, 39.5) 1.264 0.098
      Guangxi 1,372 (3.3) 29.8 (17.6, 45.7) 0.479 0.342
      Henan 3,342 (8.0) 35.7 (26.4, 46.1) −0.852 0.212
      Jiangxi 1,031 (2.4) 36.7 (26.3, 48.7) 0.199 0.418
      Chongqing 1,124 (2.7) 36.9 (21.7, 55.1) −1.625 0.058
      Inner Mongolia 661 (1.6) 38.6 (17.6, 65.0) 1.331 0.102
      Fujian 899 (2.1) 38.7 (24.2, 55.5) 1.203 0.118
      Hebei 2,394 (5.7) 38.7 (29.3, 49.1) 1.796 0.018 LL
      Jiangsu 2,746 (6.6) 39.8 (26.4, 55.0) 0.221 0.418
      Hunan 2,619 (6.3) 40.2 (24.6, 58.0) 0.271 0.396
      Ningxia 150 (0.4) 40.7 (24.2, 59.6) 2.118 0.014 HH
      Yunnan 1,027 (2.4) 41.5 (17.2, 70.9) 0.304 0.376
      Shanxi 903 (2.2) 42.6 (26.2, 60.8) −0.016 0.498
      Xizang 41 (0.1) 43.1 (25.2, 63.0) 2.818 0.006 HH
      Sichuan 2,672 (6.4) 43.2 (28.8, 58.9) 2.290 0.016 HH
      Shandong 3,104 (7.4) 44.2 (28.1, 61.7) −1.252 0.108
      Shanghai 1,946 (4.6) 45.1 (33.6, 57.1) −0.909 0.192
      Anhui 1,805 (4.3) 45.6 (37.5, 53.9) −0.666 0.254
      Heilongjiang 1,046 (2.5) 48.2 (37.6, 58.9) −1.578 0.050 HL
      Xinjiang 408 (1.0) 48.9 (40.7, 57.3) 0.256 0.370
      Hubei 1,762 (4.2) 49.8 (32.3, 67.4) −0.240 0.404
      Gansu 624 (1.5) 51.5 (27.9, 74.5) 2.754 0.010 HH
      Guizhou 866 (2.1) 55.3 (40.3, 69,3) −0.546 0.298
      Shaanxi 1,046 (2.5) 62.6 (53.0, 71.3) 0.580 0.294
      Qinghai 124 (0.3) 72.4 (55.1, 84.9) 1.307 0.094
      Abbreviation: HH=high-high; LH=low-high; LL=low-low; HL=high-low; PLADs=provincial-level administrative divisions.

      Table 2.  Prevalence and clustering patterns of subjective cognitive decline among adults aged 65 years and older across 31 PLADs, China, 2024.

      In 2024, MCI prevalence among individuals aged ≥65 years across China’s 31 PLADs ranged from 12.3% (Tianjin) to 58.9% (Qinghai). Global spatial autocorrelation analysis revealed that the distribution of MCI exhibits spatial clustering across China (Moran’s I=−0.242, Z=−2.431, P=0.015). Local spatial autocorrelation analysis identified Yunnan as a high-low clustering area and Hebei as a low-high clustering area (Table 3).

      PLADs Sample size, N (%) Weighted prevalence (%) Z Score P Clustering patterns
      Tianjin 453 (1.1) 12.3 (4.4, 29.8) −0.845 0.214
      Hainan 199 (0.5) 16.1 (4.6, 43.1) 0.120 0.418
      Xizang 41 (0.1) 17.2 (8.6, 31.5) 0.637 0.290
      Ningxia 150 (0.4) 19.4 (14.4, 25.5) 0.357 0.410
      Jiangsu 2,746 (6.6) 19.4 (11.3, 31.3) 1.114 0.134
      Liaoning 1,639 (3.9) 20.1 (9.2, 38.4) −0.566 0.264
      Jilin 802 (1.9) 20.8 (14.7, 28.6) 0.973 0.170
      Beijing 1,216 (2.9) 20.8 (12.4, 32.8) 0.264 0.384
      Zhejiang 1,775 (4.2) 21.1 (9.6, 40.2) −0.817 0.210
      Inner Mongolia 661 (1.6) 21.9 (8.6, 45.7) 0.751 0.214
      Sichuan 2,672 (6.4) 22.5 (12.7, 36.6) −0.990 0.170
      Chongqing 1,124 (2.7) 23.5 (11.7, 41.6) 0.757 0.238
      Henan 3,342 (8.0) 24.2 (17.2, 32.7) −0.130 0.418
      Yunnan 1,027 (2.4) 25.2 (10.0, 50.5) −1.429 0.050 HL
      Gansu 624 (1.5) 26.4 (14.3, 43.5) −0.968 0.164
      Fujian 899 (2.1) 27.3 (13.8, 46.7) 0.609 0.254
      Hubei 1,762 (4.2) 28.4 (15.4, 46.4) −0.953 0.170
      Hunan 2,619 (6.3) 28.7 (18.2, 42.0) −0.192 0.384
      Guangxi 1,372 (3.3) 28.9 (15.9, 46.8) −0.755 0.248
      Hebei 2,394 (5.7) 29.2 (22.3, 37.1) −3.135 0.004 LH
      Jiangxi 1,031 (2.4) 29.6 (20.3, 41.0) −0.946 0.186
      Shanghai 1,946 (4.6) 29.6 (17.3, 45.8) −1.225 0.098
      Heilongjiang 1,046 (2.5) 29.7 (21.0, 40.3) −0.265 0.426
      Guangdong 2,063 (4.9) 34.6 (17.3, 57.2) −0.261 0.426
      Shaanxi 1,046 (2.5) 35.9 (28.2, 44.3) −1.120 0.120
      Xinjiang 408 (1.0) 36.6 (29.4, 44.4) −1.134 0.060
      Guizhou 866 (2.1) 38.9 (26.6, 52.7) 0.466 0.330
      Shanxi 903 (2.2) 40.7 (25.3, 58.3) −1.804 0.054
      Anhui 1,805 (4.3) 41.2 (31.1, 52.2) −0.345 0.418
      Shandong 3,104 (7.4) 42.7 (25.6, 61.7) −0.186 0.450
      Qinghai 124 (0.3) 58.9 (38.7, 76.4) −1.254 0.102
      Abbreviation: HL=high-low; LH=low-high; PLADs=provincial-level administrative divisions.

      Table 3.  Prevalence and clustering patterns of mild cognitive impairment among adults aged 65 years and older across 31 PLADs, China, 2024.

    • This study found that the prevalence of SCD and MCI among older adults ≥65 years in China in 2024 was 38.8% and 28.4%, respectively. Previous domestic research revealed an MCI prevalence rate of 27.8% among the same age group (4). The 28.4% prevalence of MCI among China’s older population in 2024 found in this study indicates that the prevention and treatment of cognitive impairment represents a substantial public health challenge that requires urgent attention. Additionally, SCD prevalence was highest in the western regions, whereas MCI prevalence peaked in the central regions, consistent with previous research findings. These significant regional disparities in prevalence likely reflect regional differences in economic development, availability of medical resources, and access to health education.

      We observed significant regional differences in SCD and MCI prevalence among adults ≥65 years across 31 provinces in China. Notably, Qinghai Province exhibited the highest prevalence of both SCD and MCI compared to Xizang. Both Qinghai and Xizang are located on the Tibetan Plateau, where altitude gradients (1,500−2,500 m, 2,500−4,000 m, and ≥4,000 m) demonstrate significant associations with cognitive function changes. These effects are moderated by residential history (long-term/lifetime residence) and acclimatization levels, suggesting that the impact of high-altitude hypoxia on cognition may vary across individuals and environments (7). The hypoxic conditions in Qinghai are generally less severe than those in Xizang. Moderate hypoxia may pose greater risks than extreme hypoxia: chronic “sub-lethal” hypoxia can lead to sustained oxidative stress and neuroinflammation, whereas extreme hypoxia may trigger more robust protective physiological responses (8).

      Global spatial autocorrelation analysis revealed that the distribution of SCD across China exhibited clustering patterns in which high-prevalence regions were geographically adjacent to other high-prevalence areas. In contrast, MCI demonstrated a distinct spatial pattern characterized by low-prevalence regions in neighboring high-prevalence areas. This divergence between SCD and MCI stems from a fundamental misalignment between subjective self-perception and objective cognitive assessment results. This discrepancy is primarily attributable to the substantial heterogeneity within SCD populations, where symptom reporting rates depend heavily on individual awareness of cognitive changes. Consequently, individuals may report symptoms of cognitive decline that have not yet been detected (9). Additionally, multiple studies have demonstrated that MCI detection rates correlate strongly with healthcare accessibility, as reduced access increases the risk of underdiagnosis (10).

      The findings in this report are subject to three limitations. First, the cross-sectional design captured cognitive status at a single time point, preventing the examination of symptom progression trajectories over time. Second, reliance on self-reported measures introduces potential recall and social desirability biases, which may compromise response accuracy. Finally, future research should incorporate specific cognitive impairment risk factors and conduct statistical analyses to examine conversion rates among SCD, MCI, and AD.

      In conclusion, spatial clustering of SCD and MCI exists in the older Chinese population. Prevention and treatment strategies should emphasize regional differentiation by prioritizing support for high-burden areas with limited resources. Implementation of cognitive health literacy campaigns should improve public awareness of modifiable risk factors for cognitive impairment (e.g., hypertension, diabetes, and physical inactivity) in areas with high-high SCD clustering. Continuous monitoring of changes in SCD and MCI distributions will enable real-time evaluation of intervention effectiveness (e.g., health education and resource allocation), facilitating evidence-based adjustments and advancing precise public health initiatives.

    • All research personnel who contributed to the data collection efforts and all study participants whose involvement made this investigation possible.

    • The CAHS protocol approved by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Hospital (approval number: 2021BJYEC-114-01).

  • Conflicts of interest: No conflict of interest.
  • Reference (10)

    Citation:

    Catalog

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return