Advanced Search

Preplanned Studies: Detection and BI-RADS Classification of Breast Nodules in Urban Women — China, 2021

View author affiliations
  • Summary

    What is already known about this topic?

    Female breast nodules represent the most frequently detected lesions during breast ultrasound screening. Notably, nodules classified as Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4 or 5 indicate an elevated risk of breast cancer. Nevertheless, the detection rate and BI-RADS classification of female breast nodules in China remain largely undocumented.

    What is added by this report?

    In 2021, breast nodules were detected in 27.9% of urban women in China. Among women with breast nodules marked with BI-RADS classification information, 95.9% were categorized as BI-RADS 2–3, while 4.0% were classified as BI-RADS 4–5. Age, geographic location, per capita gross domestic product (GDP), body mass index (BMI), high triglyceride (TG), high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and diabetes were identified as risk factors for BI-RADS 4–5.

    What are the implications for public health practice?

    This study highlights the importance of managing high-risk women with breast nodules through BI-RADS classification. Women with older age, high TG, high LDL-C, or diabetes demonstrate higher detection rates of BI-RADS 4–5, underscoring the need for targeted health interventions for high-risk populations while accounting for regional and socioeconomic disparities.

  • loading...
  • Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest
  • Funding: Strategic Research and Consultancy Project of the Chinese Academy of Engineering (2023-JB-11)
  • [1] Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2024;74(3):229 − 63. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21834.
    [2] Sun KX, Zhang BL, Lei SY, Zheng RS, Liang X, Li L, et al. Incidence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life years of female breast cancer in China, 2022. Chin Med J (Engl) 2024;137(20):2429 − 36. https://doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000003278.
    [3] Kolak A, Kamińska M, Sygit K, Budny A, Surdyka D, Kukiełka-Budny B, et al. Primary and secondary prevention of breast cancer. Ann Agric Environ Med 2017;24(4):549 − 53. https://doi.org/10.26444/aaem/75943.
    [4] Magny SJ, Shikhman R, Keppke AL. Breast imaging reporting and data system. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. 2025. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29083600/.
    [5] Eghtedari M, Chong A, Rakow-Penner R, Ojeda-Fournier H. Current status and future of BI-RADS in multimodality imaging, from the AJR special series on radiology reporting and data systems. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2021;216(4):860 − 73. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.20.24894.
    [6] Man SLM, Deng YH, Ma Y, Fu JZ, Bao HL, Yu CQ, et al. Prevalence of liver steatosis and fibrosis in the general population and various high-risk populations: a nationwide study with 5. 7 million adults in China. Gastroenterology 2023;165(4):1025 − 40. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2023.05.053.
    [7] Coles CE, Earl H, Anderson BO, Barrios CH, Bienz M, Bliss JM, et al. The lancet breast cancer commission. Lancet 2024;403(10439):1895 − 950. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00747-5.
    [8] Li H, Wang Z, Liu JS, Zou BS, Chen HR, Xu Z, et al. Association between breast and thyroid lesions: a cross-sectional study based on ultrasonography screening in China. Thyroid 2020;30(8):1150 − 8. https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2019.0184.
    [9] Jin YY, Wang GY, Zheng YY, Zheng YL. Ordinal analysis on ultrasonographic classification of female breast nodules in physical examination. Chin J Public Health Manage 2020;36(2):182 − 5. https://doi.org/10.19568/j.cnki.23-1318.2020.02.009.
    [10] Long Y, Zhang W, Zheng ML, Xie Q, Liu H, Hu XT, et al. Association between breast nodules, anxiety, depression and metabolic risk factors in a Chinese cohort. Front Psychiatry 2023;14:944354. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.944354.
    [11] Li SC, Zhao HL, Kong FQ, Zhang JQ, Jin Z, Yu X, et al. Analysis of incidence and influencing factors of breast nodules in women undergoing physical examination in Liaoning. Med Innovation China 2022;19(3):89 − 93. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-4985.2022.03.021.
  • FIGURE 1.  Regional disparities in the detection rate of breast nodules in Chinese urban women, 2021.

    TABLE 1.  Detection rate and associated factors of breast nodules in urban women in China, 2021.

    Variables Number (n, %) Nodules (%, 95% CI) Nodules
    OR (95% CI) P
    Overall 6,412,893 (100.0) 27.9 (27.8, 27.9)
    Age group (years)
    18–29 984,606 (15.3) 22.9 (22.8, 23.0) Reference
    30–39 1,930,638 (30.1) 28.2 (28.2, 28.3) 1.34 (1.33, 1.35) <0.0001
    40–49 1,443,857 (22.5) 37.0 (36.9, 37.1) 2.10 (2.09, 2.11) <0.0001
    50–59 1,369,632 (21.4) 27.1 (27.0, 27.1) 1.37 (1.36, 1.38) <0.0001
    60–69 526,369 (8.2) 17.2 (17.1, 17.3) 0.76 (0.75, 0.76) <0.0001
    70+ 157,791 (2.5) 13.7 (13.6, 13.9)* 0.59 (0.58, 0.60) <0.0001
    Geographic region
    Eastern 3,074,829 (47.9) 29.8 (29.8, 29.9) Reference
    Central 1,499,099 (23.4) 27.1 (27.0, 27.2) 0.89 (0.88, 0.89) <0.0001
    Western 1,222,489 (19.1) 22.3 (22.2, 22.3) 0.68 (0.68, 0.68) <0.0001
    Northeastern 616,476 (9.6) 31.2 (31.1, 31.3)* 1.12 (1.11, 1.13) <0.0001
    Per capita GDP
    Lowest 1,625,373 (25.3) 25.8 (25.7, 25.9) Reference
    Up to median 1,613,646 (25.2) 26.8 (26.8, 26.9) 1.08 (1.08, 1.09) <0.0001
    Above median 1,514,973 (23.6) 29.1 (29.0, 29.1) 1.12 (1.12, 1.13) <0.0001
    Highest 1,658,901 (25.9) 29.8 (29.7, 29.9)* 1.11 (1.10, 1.11) <0.0001
    BMI
    Underweight 340,926 (5.3) 27.9 (27.8, 28.1) 1.04 (1.03, 1.04) <0.0001
    Normal 3,650,339 (56.9) 29.5 (29.4, 29.5) Reference
    Overweight 1,808,859 (28.2) 26.5 (26.4, 26.5) 0.86 (0.86, 0.87) <0.0001
    Obesity 612,769 (9.6) 22.6 (22.5, 22.7)* 0.72 (0.71, 0.72) <0.0001
    High TG
    No 5,220,433 (81.4) 28.4 (28.4, 28.4) Reference
    Yes 1,192,460 (18.6) 25.6 (25.5, 25.6)* 0.98 (0.98, 0.99) <0.0001
    High LDL-C
    No 5,144,749 (80.2) 28.2 (28.2, 28.2) Reference
    Yes 1,268,144 (19.8) 26.6 (26.5, 26.6)* 0.99 (0.98, 0.99) <0.0001
    Diabetes
    No 6,195,661 (96.6) 28.1 (28.0, 28.1) Reference
    Yes 217,232 (3.4) 22.7 (22.6, 22.9)* 0.96 (0.95, 0.97) <0.0001
    Note: “−” means that data are not applicable.
    Abbreviation: OR=odds ratio; CI=confidential interval; GDP=gross domestic product; LDL-C=low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
    * P<0.05.
    Download: CSV

    TABLE 2.  Detection rates of various BI-RADS classifications and associated factors of BI-RADS 4–5 in urban women, China, 2021.

    Variables Number
    (n, %)
    BI-RADS (%, 95% CI) BI-RADS 4–5
    2–3 4–5 OR (95% CI) P
    Overall 788,367 (100.0) 95.9 (95.9, 96.0) 4.0 (4.0, 4.0)
    Age group, years
    18–29 112,893 (14.3) 97.8 (97.7, 97.9) 2.2 (2.1, 2.3) Reference
    30–39 243,082 (30.8) 97.3 (97.2, 97.4) 2.7 (2.6, 2.7) 1.22 (1.16, 1.28) <0.0001
    40–49 231,893 (29.4) 95.8 (95.8, 95.9) 4.1 (4.0, 4.2) 1.86 (1.77, 1.94) <0.0001
    50–59 158,946 (20.2) 94.1 (94.0, 94.2) 5.9 (5.8, 6.0) 2.62 (2.50, 2.75) <0.0001
    60–69 34,294 (4.4) 91.4 (91.1, 91.7) 8.6 (8.3, 8.9) 3.95 (3.73, 4.19) <0.0001
    70+ 7,259 (0.9) 88.3 (87.6, 89.1)* 11.6 (10.8, 12.3) * 5.41 (4.97, 5.90) <0.0001
    Geographic region
    Eastern 425,123 (53.9) 96.6 (96.6, 96.7) 3.3 (3.3, 3.4) Reference
    Central 161,651 (20.5) 96.1 (96.0, 96.2) 3.9 (3.8, 4.0) 1.12 (1.08, 1.15) <0.0001
    Western 133,538 (16.9) 93.8 (93.7, 94.0) 6.0 (5.9, 6.2) 1.89 (1.83, 1.95) <0.0001
    Northeastern 68,055 (8.7) 95.4 (95.3, 95.6)* 4.6 (4.4, 4.7)* 1.19 (1.14, 1.25) <0.0001
    Per capita GDP
    Lowest 196,744 (25.0) 95.6 (95.5, 95.7) 4.4 (4.3, 4.5) Reference
    Up to median 230,338 (29.2) 95.5 (95.4, 95.6) 4.5 (4.4, 4.6) 1.05 (1.02, 1.08) 0.0012
    Above median 181,244 (23.0) 96.0 (96.0, 96.1) 3.9 (3.8, 4.0) 1.13 (1.09, 1.17) <0.0001
    Highest 180,041 (22.8) 96.9 (96.8, 96.9)* 3.1 (3.0, 3.2)* 1.08 (1.03, 1.12) 0.0004
    BMI
    Underweight 47,256 (6.0) 97.3 (97.2, 97.5) 2.6 (2.5, 2.7) 0.93 (0.87, 0.98) 0.0108
    Normal 487,221 (61.8) 96.3 (96.2, 96.3) 3.7 (3.6, 3.7) Reference
    Overweight 200,719 (25.5) 95.1 (95.0, 95.2) 4.8 (4.7, 4.9) 1.06 (1.03, 1.09) <0.0001
    Obesity 53,171 (6.7) 94.9 (94.7, 95.0)* 5.1 (4.9, 5.3)* 1.07 (1.02, 1.11) 0.0034
    High TG
    No 658,122 (83.5) 96.2 (96.2, 96.3) 3.7 (3.7, 3.8) Reference
    Yes 130,245 (16.5) 94.5 (94.4, 94.6)* 5.4 (5.3, 5.6)* 1.06 (1.03, 1.10) <0.0001
    High LDL-C
    No 637,905 (80.9) 96.2 (96.2, 96.3) 3.7 (3.7, 3.8) Reference
    Yes 150,462 (19.1) 94.7 (94.6, 94.8)* 5.3 (5.1, 5.4)* 1.09 (1.06, 1.13) <0.0001
    Diabetes
    No 768,214 (97.4) 96.0 (96.0, 96.1) 3.9 (3.9, 4.0) Reference
    Yes 120,153 (2.6) 93.2 (93.0, 93.6)* 6.7 (6.4, 7.1)* 1.08 (1.01, 1.14) 0.0149
    Note: Due to the extremely small sample size, the detection rate of BI-RADS 0–1 is 0.0%; therefore, these data are not displayed in the table. “-” means that data are not applicable.
    Abbreviation: OR=odds ratio; BMI=body mass index; CI=confidence interval; GDP=gross domestic product; LDL-C=low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
    * P<0.05.
    Download: CSV

Citation:

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents

Article Metrics

Article views(507) PDF downloads(1) Cited by()

Share

Related

Detection and BI-RADS Classification of Breast Nodules in Urban Women — China, 2021

View author affiliations

Summary

What is already known about this topic?

Female breast nodules represent the most frequently detected lesions during breast ultrasound screening. Notably, nodules classified as Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4 or 5 indicate an elevated risk of breast cancer. Nevertheless, the detection rate and BI-RADS classification of female breast nodules in China remain largely undocumented.

What is added by this report?

In 2021, breast nodules were detected in 27.9% of urban women in China. Among women with breast nodules marked with BI-RADS classification information, 95.9% were categorized as BI-RADS 2–3, while 4.0% were classified as BI-RADS 4–5. Age, geographic location, per capita gross domestic product (GDP), body mass index (BMI), high triglyceride (TG), high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and diabetes were identified as risk factors for BI-RADS 4–5.

What are the implications for public health practice?

This study highlights the importance of managing high-risk women with breast nodules through BI-RADS classification. Women with older age, high TG, high LDL-C, or diabetes demonstrate higher detection rates of BI-RADS 4–5, underscoring the need for targeted health interventions for high-risk populations while accounting for regional and socioeconomic disparities.

  • 1. Institute of Medical Information, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
  • 2. Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
  • 3. Meinian Institute of Health, Beijing, China
  • 4. Peking University Health Science Center Meinian Public Health Institute, Beijing, China
  • 5. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China
  • 6. Key Laboratory of Epidemiology of Major Diseases (Peking University), Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
  • 7. Peking University Center for Public Health and Epidemic Preparedness & Response, Beijing, China
  • 8. National Center for Chronic and Non-communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China
  • Corresponding authors:

    Hui Liu, liuhui@pumc.edu.cn

    Sailimai Man, sailimai.man@meinianresearch.com

    Liming Li, lmlee@bjmu.edu.cn

  • Funding: Strategic Research and Consultancy Project of the Chinese Academy of Engineering (2023-JB-11)
  • Online Date: March 07 2025
    Issue Date: March 07 2025
    doi: 10.46234/ccdcw2025.056
    • Introduction: Female breast nodules represent the most frequently detected lesions during breast ultrasound screening. Notably, nodules classified as BI-RADS 4 or 5 indicate an elevated risk of breast cancer. Nevertheless, the detection rate and BI-RADS classification of female breast nodules across China remain largely undocumented.

      Methods: This study analyzed health examination data from 6,412,893 urban women across 31 provincial-level administrative divisions (PLADs). We calculated detection rates of breast nodules and their various BI-RADS classifications. Chi-square (χ2) tests were performed to compare differences between groups. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to explore associations between breast nodules and BI-RADS 4–5 with demographic, socioeconomic, and metabolic indicators.

      Results: The overall detection rate of breast nodules in Chinese urban women was 27.9%, with provincial rates ranging from 11.6% to 37.0%. Among women with breast nodules marked with BI-RADS classification information, 95.9% were categorized as BI-RADS 2–3, while 4.0% were classified as BI-RADS 4–5. Further analyses revealed that age, geographic region, per capita gross domestic product (GDP), body mass index (BMI), high triglyceride (TG), high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and diabetes were significant risk factors for BI-RADS 4–5 classification.

      Conclusions: This study highlights the importance of managing high-risk women with breast nodules through BI-RADS classification, underscoring the need for targeted health interventions while considering regional and socioeconomic disparities.

    • Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer among women, with a significant rise in incidence observed in China (1-2). Breast ultrasound plays a central role in the early detection of female breast cancer or lesions predisposing to female breast cancer, particularly nodules, which are the most commonly encountered abnormalities (3). The Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) provides a standardized framework for assessing and reporting the malignancy risk associated with breast nodules. Notably, nodules classified as BI-RADS 4 or 5 indicate an elevated risk of breast cancer (4-5). This distinction is critical for risk stratification and subsequent clinical decision-making. However, there is a significant gap in nationwide research regarding the detection rate of female breast nodules in China, as well as the prevalence of nodules with malignancy risk. This paucity of data may impede timely intervention and prevention for breast cancer. Therefore, this study analyzed the health examination data of 6,412,893 urban women from 31 provincial-level administrative divisions (PLADs) across the country, aiming to comprehensively investigate the detection rate and BI-RADS classification of breast nodules in Chinese urban women, and identify factors potentially associated with the malignancy risk. Our findings demonstrated that the overall detection rate of breast nodules in Chinese urban women was 27.9%, with provincial rates ranging from 11.6% to 37.0% across 31 PLADs. Among women with breast nodules marked with BI-RADS classification information, 95.9% were categorized as BI-RADS 2–3, while 4.0% were classified as BI-RADS 4–5. Further analyses revealed that age, geographic region, per capita gross domestic product (GDP), body mass index (BMI), high triglyceride (TG), high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and diabetes were risk factors of BI-RADS 4–5. The findings of this study provide valuable evidence to guide breast cancer prevention strategies in China.

      This study utilized data from the Meinian Healthcare Group system, the largest health examination chain in China, with coverage across 231 prefecture-level cities spanning 31 PLADs. The Meinian Healthcare Group implements a comprehensive quality control system encompassing standardized operational protocols, unified staff training programs, and regular quality assessments for imaging and laboratory testing. Study participants primarily comprised employees and urban residents who underwent physical examinations, laboratory tests, and imaging assessments, as detailed in a previous publication (6). From January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2021, a total of 6,412,893 women were included in the analysis. Exclusion criteria encompassed: male sex; age under 18 years; pregnancy; absence of breast ultrasound information; and history of bilateral breast cancer surgery.

      The detection rate of breast nodules was defined as the proportion of women with clearly documented breast nodules in their ultrasound examination reports relative to the total number of women examined. In accordance with the BI-RADS guidelines, breast nodules were stratified into three categories: BI-RADS 0–1 (lesions requiring further imaging or negative findings), BI-RADS 2–3 (benign lesions), and BI-RADS 4–5 (malignant lesions). The detection rate for each BI-RADS classification group was calculated as the proportion of samples assigned to that particular classification relative to the total number of samples labeled with any BI-RADS classification. Explanatory variables included age, geographic region (east, central, west, and northeast), city-level per capita GDP, BMI (kg/m2), high TG (defined as TG≥1.7 mmol/L), high LDL-C (defined as LDL-C≥3.4 mmol/L), and diabetes (defined as fasting glucose ≥7.0 mmol/L).

      We calculated the detection rate of female breast nodules and various BI-RADS classifications, along with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Chi-square (χ2) tests were performed to compare differences between groups. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to examine the associations between female breast nodules and BI-RADS 4–5 with demographic, socioeconomic, and metabolic indicators, adjusting for all explanatory variables. Statistical analyses were conducted using SAS software (version 9.4, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). A two-tailed P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

      Among the 6,412,893 eligible women, 30.1% were aged 30–39 years, 47.9% resided in eastern China, and 28.2% were overweight. Overall, 27.9% (95% CI: 27.8%, 27.9%) of urban women in China were detected with breast nodules. The detection rate varied significantly by age, region, and per capita GDP, with the highest rates observed among women aged 40–49 years (37.0%, 95% CI: 36.9%, 37.1%), those residing in northeastern China (31.2%, 95% CI: 31.1%, 31.3%), and those living in areas with the highest per capita GDP (29.8%, 95% CI: 29.7%, 29.9%). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that women aged 40–49 years demonstrated the highest risk of having breast nodules [odds ratio (OR)=2.10, 95% CI: 2.09, 2.11]. Women living in areas with the lowest per capita GDP had the lowest risk of breast nodules. Regarding BMI, underweight women were more susceptible to developing breast nodules (Table 1).

      Variables Number (n, %) Nodules (%, 95% CI) Nodules
      OR (95% CI) P
      Overall 6,412,893 (100.0) 27.9 (27.8, 27.9)
      Age group (years)
      18–29 984,606 (15.3) 22.9 (22.8, 23.0) Reference
      30–39 1,930,638 (30.1) 28.2 (28.2, 28.3) 1.34 (1.33, 1.35) <0.0001
      40–49 1,443,857 (22.5) 37.0 (36.9, 37.1) 2.10 (2.09, 2.11) <0.0001
      50–59 1,369,632 (21.4) 27.1 (27.0, 27.1) 1.37 (1.36, 1.38) <0.0001
      60–69 526,369 (8.2) 17.2 (17.1, 17.3) 0.76 (0.75, 0.76) <0.0001
      70+ 157,791 (2.5) 13.7 (13.6, 13.9)* 0.59 (0.58, 0.60) <0.0001
      Geographic region
      Eastern 3,074,829 (47.9) 29.8 (29.8, 29.9) Reference
      Central 1,499,099 (23.4) 27.1 (27.0, 27.2) 0.89 (0.88, 0.89) <0.0001
      Western 1,222,489 (19.1) 22.3 (22.2, 22.3) 0.68 (0.68, 0.68) <0.0001
      Northeastern 616,476 (9.6) 31.2 (31.1, 31.3)* 1.12 (1.11, 1.13) <0.0001
      Per capita GDP
      Lowest 1,625,373 (25.3) 25.8 (25.7, 25.9) Reference
      Up to median 1,613,646 (25.2) 26.8 (26.8, 26.9) 1.08 (1.08, 1.09) <0.0001
      Above median 1,514,973 (23.6) 29.1 (29.0, 29.1) 1.12 (1.12, 1.13) <0.0001
      Highest 1,658,901 (25.9) 29.8 (29.7, 29.9)* 1.11 (1.10, 1.11) <0.0001
      BMI
      Underweight 340,926 (5.3) 27.9 (27.8, 28.1) 1.04 (1.03, 1.04) <0.0001
      Normal 3,650,339 (56.9) 29.5 (29.4, 29.5) Reference
      Overweight 1,808,859 (28.2) 26.5 (26.4, 26.5) 0.86 (0.86, 0.87) <0.0001
      Obesity 612,769 (9.6) 22.6 (22.5, 22.7)* 0.72 (0.71, 0.72) <0.0001
      High TG
      No 5,220,433 (81.4) 28.4 (28.4, 28.4) Reference
      Yes 1,192,460 (18.6) 25.6 (25.5, 25.6)* 0.98 (0.98, 0.99) <0.0001
      High LDL-C
      No 5,144,749 (80.2) 28.2 (28.2, 28.2) Reference
      Yes 1,268,144 (19.8) 26.6 (26.5, 26.6)* 0.99 (0.98, 0.99) <0.0001
      Diabetes
      No 6,195,661 (96.6) 28.1 (28.0, 28.1) Reference
      Yes 217,232 (3.4) 22.7 (22.6, 22.9)* 0.96 (0.95, 0.97) <0.0001
      Note: “−” means that data are not applicable.
      Abbreviation: OR=odds ratio; CI=confidential interval; GDP=gross domestic product; LDL-C=low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
      * P<0.05.

      Table 1.  Detection rate and associated factors of breast nodules in urban women in China, 2021.

      Women residing in western China demonstrated a significantly lower risk of breast nodules compared to their counterparts in eastern regions (OR=0.68, 95% CI: 0.68, 0.68). Figure 1 further illustrates the regional disparity in the detection rate of female breast nodules. Overall, PLADs in the eastern and northeastern regions exhibited higher detection rates of breast nodules, while relatively lower rates were observed in the western region. At the provincial level, the detection rates of female breast nodules ranged from 11.6% to 37.0%, with the lowest detection rates observed in Xizang, Guizhou, and Chongqing, and the highest in Zhejiang, Liaoning, and Tianjin PLADs.

      Figure 1. 

      Regional disparities in the detection rate of breast nodules in Chinese urban women, 2021.

      Among women with breast nodules marked with BI-RADS classification information, 95.9% (95% CI: 95.9%, 96.0%) were classified as BI-RADS 2–3, and 4.0% (95% CI: 4.0%, 4.0%) were classified as BI-RADS 4–5. The highest detection rate of BI-RADS 4–5 was observed in women aged over 70 years (11.6%, 95% CI: 10.8%, 12.3%). Multivariable logistic regression revealed that the risk of BI-RADS 4–5 increased with age, with women aged 50 and above exhibiting odds ratios exceeding 2. Notably, women aged 70 or older demonstrated the highest risk (OR=5.41, 95% CI: 4.97, 5.90). Unlike the pattern observed for breast nodules, women in western regions had the highest risk of BI-RADS 4–5, and overweight or obese women exhibited a higher risk of BI-RADS 4–5. Women with metabolic abnormalities, including high TG, high LDL-C, and diabetes, faced an elevated risk of BI-RADS 4–5. Additionally, women residing in areas with higher per capita GDP demonstrated a higher risk of BI-RADS 4–5 (Table 2).

      Variables Number
      (n, %)
      BI-RADS (%, 95% CI) BI-RADS 4–5
      2–3 4–5 OR (95% CI) P
      Overall 788,367 (100.0) 95.9 (95.9, 96.0) 4.0 (4.0, 4.0)
      Age group, years
      18–29 112,893 (14.3) 97.8 (97.7, 97.9) 2.2 (2.1, 2.3) Reference
      30–39 243,082 (30.8) 97.3 (97.2, 97.4) 2.7 (2.6, 2.7) 1.22 (1.16, 1.28) <0.0001
      40–49 231,893 (29.4) 95.8 (95.8, 95.9) 4.1 (4.0, 4.2) 1.86 (1.77, 1.94) <0.0001
      50–59 158,946 (20.2) 94.1 (94.0, 94.2) 5.9 (5.8, 6.0) 2.62 (2.50, 2.75) <0.0001
      60–69 34,294 (4.4) 91.4 (91.1, 91.7) 8.6 (8.3, 8.9) 3.95 (3.73, 4.19) <0.0001
      70+ 7,259 (0.9) 88.3 (87.6, 89.1)* 11.6 (10.8, 12.3) * 5.41 (4.97, 5.90) <0.0001
      Geographic region
      Eastern 425,123 (53.9) 96.6 (96.6, 96.7) 3.3 (3.3, 3.4) Reference
      Central 161,651 (20.5) 96.1 (96.0, 96.2) 3.9 (3.8, 4.0) 1.12 (1.08, 1.15) <0.0001
      Western 133,538 (16.9) 93.8 (93.7, 94.0) 6.0 (5.9, 6.2) 1.89 (1.83, 1.95) <0.0001
      Northeastern 68,055 (8.7) 95.4 (95.3, 95.6)* 4.6 (4.4, 4.7)* 1.19 (1.14, 1.25) <0.0001
      Per capita GDP
      Lowest 196,744 (25.0) 95.6 (95.5, 95.7) 4.4 (4.3, 4.5) Reference
      Up to median 230,338 (29.2) 95.5 (95.4, 95.6) 4.5 (4.4, 4.6) 1.05 (1.02, 1.08) 0.0012
      Above median 181,244 (23.0) 96.0 (96.0, 96.1) 3.9 (3.8, 4.0) 1.13 (1.09, 1.17) <0.0001
      Highest 180,041 (22.8) 96.9 (96.8, 96.9)* 3.1 (3.0, 3.2)* 1.08 (1.03, 1.12) 0.0004
      BMI
      Underweight 47,256 (6.0) 97.3 (97.2, 97.5) 2.6 (2.5, 2.7) 0.93 (0.87, 0.98) 0.0108
      Normal 487,221 (61.8) 96.3 (96.2, 96.3) 3.7 (3.6, 3.7) Reference
      Overweight 200,719 (25.5) 95.1 (95.0, 95.2) 4.8 (4.7, 4.9) 1.06 (1.03, 1.09) <0.0001
      Obesity 53,171 (6.7) 94.9 (94.7, 95.0)* 5.1 (4.9, 5.3)* 1.07 (1.02, 1.11) 0.0034
      High TG
      No 658,122 (83.5) 96.2 (96.2, 96.3) 3.7 (3.7, 3.8) Reference
      Yes 130,245 (16.5) 94.5 (94.4, 94.6)* 5.4 (5.3, 5.6)* 1.06 (1.03, 1.10) <0.0001
      High LDL-C
      No 637,905 (80.9) 96.2 (96.2, 96.3) 3.7 (3.7, 3.8) Reference
      Yes 150,462 (19.1) 94.7 (94.6, 94.8)* 5.3 (5.1, 5.4)* 1.09 (1.06, 1.13) <0.0001
      Diabetes
      No 768,214 (97.4) 96.0 (96.0, 96.1) 3.9 (3.9, 4.0) Reference
      Yes 120,153 (2.6) 93.2 (93.0, 93.6)* 6.7 (6.4, 7.1)* 1.08 (1.01, 1.14) 0.0149
      Note: Due to the extremely small sample size, the detection rate of BI-RADS 0–1 is 0.0%; therefore, these data are not displayed in the table. “-” means that data are not applicable.
      Abbreviation: OR=odds ratio; BMI=body mass index; CI=confidence interval; GDP=gross domestic product; LDL-C=low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
      * P<0.05.

      Table 2.  Detection rates of various BI-RADS classifications and associated factors of BI-RADS 4–5 in urban women, China, 2021.

    • The World Health Organization emphasizes that early identification of individuals with subtle symptoms, signs, or both of possible breast malignancies is fundamentally important for breast cancer prevention and control (7). Breast nodules represent the most common lesions detected during breast ultrasound screening. Identifying women with breast nodules and assessing their malignancy risk according to BI-RADS classification constitutes an effective strategy to promote early detection and diagnosis of breast cancer. For improved policy formulation and implementation, comprehensive data are essential to understand the epidemiological profile of female breast nodules and their associated malignancy risk in China.

      This study represents the first nationwide analysis of the detection rate and BI-RADS classification of breast nodules in Chinese urban women using comprehensive health examination data. We found that 27.9% of eligible women presented with breast nodules. Compared with previous studies that relied on smaller samples or focused on specific PLADs or medical institutions, our detection rate falls within a moderate range (811). Given that our sample encompassed 31 PLADs and all adult age groups in China, these findings likely provide a more accurate reflection of the overall prevalence of breast nodules among Chinese urban women. Furthermore, this study determined that the detection rate of BI-RADS 4–5 was 4.0%, with this proportion increasing progressively with age, consistent with findings from previous research.

      Our analysis revealed that women aged 40–49 years exhibited the highest risk of breast nodules, consistent with findings from previous studies (910). Notably, our novel findings demonstrated that women aged ≥70 years and those aged 50–69 years presented significantly higher risks of BI-RADS 4–5 classification. Given China's rapidly aging population and increasing life expectancy, the elevated malignancy risk observed among elderly women warrants particular attention. These findings collectively emphasize that women aged ≥40 years face an increased risk for both breast nodules and BI-RADS 4–5 classifications, with special vigilance required for potentially malignant breast disease in women aged ≥70 years.

      BI-RADS 4–5 classification indicates a high risk of breast cancer. Our geographic distribution analysis revealed that the highest risk of BI-RADS 4–5 was observed in western regions of China. Regarding socioeconomic indicators, regions with higher per capita GDP demonstrated a significant positive correlation with increased risk of BI-RADS 4–5 classification. Additionally, this study identified several metabolic and anthropometric risk factors associated with BI-RADS 4–5, including BMI and various metabolic indicators. These findings underscore the importance of developing tailored prevention strategies for populations with these high-risk factors, while simultaneously accounting for regional and socioeconomic disparities.

      This study has several limitations. First, as the data were derived exclusively from health examination centers in urban areas, rural populations may be inadequately represented. Further research incorporating rural residents is necessary to provide a more comprehensive epidemiological profile of breast nodules across China. Second, the cross-sectional design inherently limits our ability to establish definitive causal relationships between breast nodules, BI-RADS 4–5 classification, and the associated factors identified. Finally, since our detection rates were based solely on ultrasound examination results — while breast nodule detection methods also include physical examination and mammography — there exists a potential risk of underestimation in our reported prevalence.

      This study represents the first nationwide, big data-based analysis of the detection rate and BI-RADS classification of breast nodules in Chinese urban women, alongside an exploration of factors associated with BI-RADS 4–5. The findings underscore the pressing need for greater attention to female breast nodules and provide valuable foundational data for optimizing high-risk management in China’s urban female population.

    • Granted by the Peking University Institution Review Board (IRB-0000152-19077).

  • Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest
  • Reference (11)

    Citation:

    Catalog

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return