Advanced Search

Methods and Applications: Development of a High-Throughput qPCR Assay for Detecting Waterborne Protozoa and Helminths Across Different Environmental Media in China

View author affiliations
  • Abstract

    Introduction

    The establishment of a high-throughput quantification approach for waterborne pathogenic protozoa and helminths is crucial for rapid screening and health risk assessment.

    Methods

    We developed a high-throughput quantitative polymerase chain reaction (HT-qPCR) assay targeting 19 waterborne protozoa and 3 waterborne helminths and validated its sensitivity, specificity, and repeatability. The assay was then applied to test various environmental media samples.

    Results

    The HT-qPCR assay's limit of detection (LOD) was 5×102 copies/μL DNA, and its specificity was confirmed using Giardia and Cryptosporidium standards. Repeatability, assessed through intra- and inter-group experiments, yielded a coefficient of variation (CV) of 1.0%–4.6% and 1.2%–6.4% at concentrations of 1×105 and 1×104 copies/μL, respectively. The R2 values of the 22 standard curves ranged from 0.983 to 0.998, with amplification efficiencies between 80% and 107%. In drinking water sources, sludge from municipal wastewater treatment plants (MWTPs), and livestock manure samples, 17 of 22 targets were detected, with Acanthamoeba genus (50.0%), Acanthamoeba castellanii (11.8%), and Enterocytozoon bieneusi (11.8%) showing high prevalence. Cryptosporidium spp., Enterocytozoon bieneusi, and Cyclospora cayetanensis were simultaneously found in all three sample types.

    Discussion

    This study presents a useful tool for the rapid detection of waterborne protozoa and helminths in complex environmental microbiomes, providing scientific data for monitoring cross-media transmission and controlling microbial risk from a One Health perspective.

  • loading...
  • Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest.
  • Funding: Supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFC3204703), and the China Postdoctoral Innovation Talents Support Program (BX20230400)
  • [1] Ma JY, Li MY, Qi ZZ, Fu M, Sun TF, Elsheikha HM, et al. Waterborne protozoan outbreaks: an update on the global, regional, and national prevalence from 2017 to 2020 and sources of contamination. Sci Total Environ 2022;806:150562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150562CrossRef
    [2] Plutzer J, Karanis P. Neglected waterborne parasitic protozoa and their detection in water. Water Res 2016;101:318 − 32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.05.085CrossRef
    [3] WHO. Guidelines for drinking-water quality, 4th edition, incorporating the 1st addendum. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241549950.
    [4] National Institutes of Health, USA. NIAID Biodefense Research Agenda for Category B and C Priority Pathogens. https://www.hsdl.org/c/view?docid=441288. [2024-8-15].
    [5] National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China. Standards for Drinking Water Quality (GB 5749-2022). Mandatory national standards. https://www.ndcpa.gov.cn/jbkzzx/c100201/common/content/content_1665979083259711488.html. [2024-8-15].
    [6] European Union. Directive (EU) 2020/2184 of the European parliament and of the council of 16 December 2020 on the quality of water intended for human consumption. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2020/2184/oj. [2024-8-15].
    [7] Stentiford GD, Feist SW, Stone DM, Bateman KS, Dunn AM. Microsporidia: diverse, dynamic, and emergent pathogens in aquatic systems. Trends Parasitol 2013;29(11):567 − 78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2013.08.005CrossRef
    [8] Efstratiou A, Ongerth J, Karanis P. Evolution of monitoring for Giardia and Cryptosporidium in water. Water Res 2017;123:96 − 112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.06.042CrossRef
    [9] Tuo JH, Shen Y, Jia SY, Liu SN, Zhang QF, Wang DP, et al. HPB-chip: an accurate high-throughput qPCR-based tool for rapidly profiling waterborne human pathogenic bacteria in the environment. Water Res 2024;260:121927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2024.121927CrossRef
    [10] Xie ST, Ding LJ, Huang FY, Zhao Y, An XL, Su JQ, et al. VFG-Chip: a high-throughput qPCR microarray for profiling virulence factor genes from the environment. Environ Int 2023;172:107761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2023.107761CrossRef
    [11] Brooks YM, Spirito CM, Bae JS, Hong AN, Mosier EM, Sausele DJ, et al. Fecal indicator bacteria, fecal source tracking markers, and pathogens detected in two Hudson river tributaries. Water Res 2020;171:115342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.115342CrossRef
    [12] Lappan R, Jirapanjawat T, Williamson DA, Lange S, Chown SL, Greening C. Simultaneous detection of multiple pathogens with the TaqMan Array Card. MethodsX 2022;9:101707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2022.101707CrossRef
    [13] Ahmed W, Zhang Q, Ishii S, Hamilton K, Haas C. Microfluidic quantification of multiple enteric and opportunistic bacterial pathogens in roof-harvested rainwater tank samples. Environ Monit Assess 2018;190(2):105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-6482-0CrossRef
    [14] Galván AL, Magnet A, Izquierdo F, Fenoy S, Rueda C, Fernández Vadillo C, et al. Molecular characterization of human-pathogenic microsporidia and Cyclospora cayetanensis isolated from various water sources in Spain: a year-long longitudinal study. Appl Environ Microbiol 2013;79(2):449 − 59. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02737-12CrossRef
    [15] Ben Ayed L, Yang WL, Widmer G, Cama V, Ortega Y, Xiao LH. Survey and genetic characterization of wastewater in Tunisia for Cryptosporidium spp. , Giardia duodenalis, Enterocytozoon bieneusi, Cyclospora cayetanensis and Eimeria spp. J Water Health 2012;10(3):431 − 44. https://doi.org/10.2166/wh.2012.204CrossRef
    [16] Hu Y, Feng YY, Huang CC, Xiao LH. Occurrence, source, and human infection potential of Cryptosporidium and Enterocytozoon bieneusi in drinking source water in Shanghai, China, during a pig carcass disposal incident. Environ Sci Technol 2014;48(24):14219 − 27. https://doi.org/10.1021/es504464tCrossRef
    [17] Wang HY, Lin XH, Sun YX, Qi NS, Lv MN, Xiao WW, et al. Occurrence, risk factors and genotypes of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in dogs and cats in Guangzhou, southern China: high genotype diversity and zoonotic concern. BMC Vet Res 2020;16(1):201. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-020-02421-4CrossRef
  • TABLE 1.  Basic information of waterborne protozoa and helminths.

    Pathogen Detection target Health significance Persistence in water supplies Resistance to chlorine Relative infectivity Important animal source
    Acanthamoeba Acanthamoeba
    Acanthamoeba culbertsoni High May multiply Low High No
    Acanthamoeba castellanii High May multiply Low High No
    Acanthamoeba polyphaga High May multiply Low High No
    Balantioides Balantidium coli High Moderate High High No
    Blastocystis Blastocystis hominis High May multiply High Moderate Yes
    Cryptosporidium Cryptosporidium spp.
    Cryptosporidium parvum High Long High High Yes
    Cryptosporidium hominis High Long High High Yes
    Cryptosporidium meleagridis High Long High High Yes
    Cyclospora Cyclospora cayetanensis High Long High High Yes
    Enterocytozoon Enterocytozoon bieneusi High Long High High Yes
    Entamoeba Entamoeba histolytica High Moderate High High No
    Encephalitozoon Encephalitozoon High Moderate High Moderate Yes
    Giardia spp. Giardia spp.
    Giardia lamblia High Moderate High High Yes
    Naegleria Naegleria fowleri High May multiply Low Moderate No
    Isospora Isospora belli Moderate Moderate High High Yes
    Toxoplasma gondii Toxoplasma gondii High Long High High Yes
    Echinococcus Echinococcus High Long Low Moderate Yes
    Dracunculus Dracunculus medinensis Low Moderate Moderate High No
    Schistosoma Schistosoma spp. High Short Moderate High Yes
    Note: “−”=not available.
    Download: CSV

    TABLE 2.  Sensitivity test results of the HT−qPCR assay.

    Positive plasmid copy number (copies/μL) Ct value within group Note
    Average value Standard deviation Coefficient of variation (%)
    1×106 17.4–19.3 0.08–0.4 0.4–2.2 Stable detection of 24 targets
    1×105 20.8–23.0 0.2–0.9 1.0–4.1 Stable detection of 24 targets
    1×104 25.0–27.3 0.4–1.2 1.7–4.6 Stable detection of 24 targets
    1×103 27.9–30.7 0.5–2.6 1.5–8.6 Stable detection of 24 targets
    5×102 28.8–31.4 0.03–1.0 0.1–3.3 Stable detection of 24 targets
    4×102 ND–33.5 0.6–9.3 1.9–50.7 Stable detection of 15 out of 24 targets
    3×102 ND–32.3 0.4–8.6 1.2–37.6 Stable detection of 12 out of 24 targets
    2×102 ND–32.5 0.2–9.6 0.5–46.4 All 24 target detections are unstable
    1×102 ND–32.9 0.2–7.2 0.9–48.5 All 24 target detections are unstable
    Abbreviation: HT-qPCR=high-throughput quantitative polymerase chain reaction; Ct=Cycle threshold.
    Download: CSV

    TABLE 3.  Protozoa and helminth DR in environmental samples by HT-qPCR.

    Type No. Target Drinking water sources (DR%) MWTP sludge (DR%) Livestock manure (DR%)
    Protozoa 1 Acanthamoeba genus 54.3 58.0 20.0
    2 Acanthamoeba culbertsoni 4.3 8.3 10.0
    3 Acanthamoeba castellanii 10.9 8.3 20.0
    4 Acanthamoeba polyphaga 2.2 25.0
    5 Balantidium coli 2.2 8.3 40.0
    6 Blastocystis hominis 10.0
    7 Cryptosporidium spp. 8.7 16.7 10.0
    8 Cryptosporidium meleagridis
    9 Cryptosporidium hominis
    10 Cryptosporidium parvum 8.3
    11 Cyclospora cayetanensis 4.3 8.3 20.0
    12 Isospora belli 2.2 33.3 10.0
    13 Encephalitozoon 2.2
    14 Entamoeba histolytica 8.3
    15 Enterocytozoon bieneusi 8.7 16.7 20.0
    16 Giardia spp.
    17 Giardia lamblia 16.7
    18 Naegleria fowleri 13.1
    19 Toxoplasma gondii 10.0
    Helminths 20 Echinococcus
    21 Dracunculus medinensis 2.2 8.3 10.0
    22 Schistosoma spp.
    Note: "−"=not detectable.
    Abbreviation: MWTP=municipal wastewater treatment plant; DR=detection rates; HT-qPCR=high-throughput quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
    Download: CSV

Citation:

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents

Article Metrics

Article views(109) PDF downloads(0) Cited by()

Share

Related

Development of a High-Throughput qPCR Assay for Detecting Waterborne Protozoa and Helminths Across Different Environmental Media in China

View author affiliations

Abstract

Introduction

The establishment of a high-throughput quantification approach for waterborne pathogenic protozoa and helminths is crucial for rapid screening and health risk assessment.

Methods

We developed a high-throughput quantitative polymerase chain reaction (HT-qPCR) assay targeting 19 waterborne protozoa and 3 waterborne helminths and validated its sensitivity, specificity, and repeatability. The assay was then applied to test various environmental media samples.

Results

The HT-qPCR assay's limit of detection (LOD) was 5×102 copies/μL DNA, and its specificity was confirmed using Giardia and Cryptosporidium standards. Repeatability, assessed through intra- and inter-group experiments, yielded a coefficient of variation (CV) of 1.0%–4.6% and 1.2%–6.4% at concentrations of 1×105 and 1×104 copies/μL, respectively. The R2 values of the 22 standard curves ranged from 0.983 to 0.998, with amplification efficiencies between 80% and 107%. In drinking water sources, sludge from municipal wastewater treatment plants (MWTPs), and livestock manure samples, 17 of 22 targets were detected, with Acanthamoeba genus (50.0%), Acanthamoeba castellanii (11.8%), and Enterocytozoon bieneusi (11.8%) showing high prevalence. Cryptosporidium spp., Enterocytozoon bieneusi, and Cyclospora cayetanensis were simultaneously found in all three sample types.

Discussion

This study presents a useful tool for the rapid detection of waterborne protozoa and helminths in complex environmental microbiomes, providing scientific data for monitoring cross-media transmission and controlling microbial risk from a One Health perspective.

  • 1. State Key Laboratory of Environmental Aquatic Chemistry, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
  • 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
  • 3. College of Life Sciences, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou City, Henan Province, China
  • 4. Henan Institutes of Advanced Technology, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou City, Henan Province, China
  • Corresponding author:

    Yu Zhang: zhangyu@rcees.ac.cn

  • Funding: Supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFC3204703), and the China Postdoctoral Innovation Talents Support Program (BX20230400)
  • Online Date: January 17 2025
    Issue Date: January 17 2025
    doi: 10.46234/ccdcw2025.016
  • Water is a common transmission vector for numerous pathogens. Many waterborne protozoa and helminths are zoonotic, posing significant risks to both humans and animals, particularly through the ingestion of fecally contaminated water. Even at relatively low environmental concentrations, these pathogens can present substantial public health risks, with vulnerable populations such as the elderly, children, and individuals with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome being particularly susceptible (1). A notable example is the 1993 cryptosporidiosis outbreak in Milwaukee, United States, which resulted in approximately 400,000 infections (2). From a One Health perspective, cross-media monitoring and understanding transmission mechanisms are crucial for controlling waterborne protozoa and helminths in the environment-animal-human continuum.

    Among waterborne protozoa and helminths, Cryptosporidium and Giardia are included in the National Standard for Drinking Water Quality of China (GB 5749-2022), the European Union's drinking water quality standards, and the World Health Organization's (WHO) Guidelines for drinking-water quality. They are also classified as Class B pathogenic microorganisms by the National Institutes of Health, USA (36). No other waterborne protozoa are included in these standards and guidelines. In addition to Cryptosporidium and Giardia, other pathogens such as Echinococcus ameba, Microsporidium, Enterocytozoon bieneusi, Toxoplasma gondii, and Schistosoma have also been linked to waterborne diseases in both humans and animals (1,7). Therefore, there is an urgent need for an efficient detection method that can cover a broad spectrum of these waterborne protozoa and helminths. Traditional detection methods for pathogenic protozoa and helminths mainly include microscopy, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), nested PCR, and loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) (8). Recent advancements in high-throughput technologies have enabled the detection of microorganisms within complex microbiomes. High-throughput qPCR (HT-qPCR) has been widely employed for monitoring of bacterial pathogens and viruses in environmental samples (911). However, a high-throughput approach specifically targeting waterborne protozoa and helminths is still lacking, impeding the rapid screening of these pathogens in the environment. In this study, we developed and validated an HT-qPCR method for the detection of protozoa and helminths and applied it to screen for waterborne pathogens in environmental samples and related pollution sources from a One-Health perspective.

    • A One Health perspective emphasizes the close links between human, animal, and environmental health. This study selected environmental samples, including: 1) drinking water source samples from the Yangtze River in August 2023 (n=23) and Yellow River in October 2023 and January 2024 (n=23) in China (n=46); 2) sludge samples from municipal wastewater treatment plants (MWTPs) in 2015 (n=12); and 3) livestock manure in 2020 and 2021 from pigs (n=6), chickens (n=2), sheep (n=1), and cattle (n=1). These samples are closely related to human, animal, and environmental health, respectively, and were used to investigate the potential risks of pathogenic microorganisms. Studying and managing these samples will help us better understand and respond to various health risks and achieve common health goals for humans, animals, and the environment. For drinking water source samples, 10 L of water was concentrated using the calcium carbonate flocculation method, and the concentrate was transferred for DNA extraction. Sludge and livestock manure samples were used directly for DNA extraction. Environmental DNA was extracted from 0.5 g of sample concentrate using the FastDNA SPIN Kit for Soil and eluted in 75 μL of DES. Extracted DNA was stored at −20 °C until use.

    • Twenty-two pathogenic taxa, including 19 protozoa and 3 helminths, were selected as detection targets (Table 1). These taxa were chosen based on their waterborne characteristics and potential environmental dissemination risk as outlined in the WHO Water Quality Guidelines (4th edition) (3). Additionally, 18S rRNA and 16S rRNA genes served as quality controls. DNA was diluted to approximately 20 ng/μL, and 400 ng/μL bovine serum albumin (BSA) was added to each qPCR system to improve amplification efficiency and mitigate potential inhibition. The amplification efficiency of all reactions was between 80% and 120%.

      Pathogen Detection target Health significance Persistence in water supplies Resistance to chlorine Relative infectivity Important animal source
      Acanthamoeba Acanthamoeba
      Acanthamoeba culbertsoni High May multiply Low High No
      Acanthamoeba castellanii High May multiply Low High No
      Acanthamoeba polyphaga High May multiply Low High No
      Balantioides Balantidium coli High Moderate High High No
      Blastocystis Blastocystis hominis High May multiply High Moderate Yes
      Cryptosporidium Cryptosporidium spp.
      Cryptosporidium parvum High Long High High Yes
      Cryptosporidium hominis High Long High High Yes
      Cryptosporidium meleagridis High Long High High Yes
      Cyclospora Cyclospora cayetanensis High Long High High Yes
      Enterocytozoon Enterocytozoon bieneusi High Long High High Yes
      Entamoeba Entamoeba histolytica High Moderate High High No
      Encephalitozoon Encephalitozoon High Moderate High Moderate Yes
      Giardia spp. Giardia spp.
      Giardia lamblia High Moderate High High Yes
      Naegleria Naegleria fowleri High May multiply Low Moderate No
      Isospora Isospora belli Moderate Moderate High High Yes
      Toxoplasma gondii Toxoplasma gondii High Long High High Yes
      Echinococcus Echinococcus High Long Low Moderate Yes
      Dracunculus Dracunculus medinensis Low Moderate Moderate High No
      Schistosoma Schistosoma spp. High Short Moderate High Yes
      Note: “−”=not available.

      Table 1.  Basic information of waterborne protozoa and helminths.

      The PCR primers and probes were designed using a Thermo Fisher proprietary process, with Tm values between 58 °C and 62 °C (12). Primer lengths were between 9 bp and 40 bp, with GC content ranging from 30% to 80%. Primer and probe information, including assay IDs, is shown in Supplementary Table S1 and stored in the Odyssey data by Thermo Fisher. The HT-qPCR assay for detecting waterborne protozoa and helminths was conducted on OpenArray chips using an Applied Biosystems QuantStudio 12K Flex instrument (Thermo Fisher, USA). The OpenArray Module enables simultaneous operation of up to four OpenArray chips, allowing testing of up to 192 samples over a 3-hour period, significantly increasing reaction throughput.

    • For the sensitivity test, the standard plasmid (1×107 copies/μL) was diluted to a gradient of 1×106, 1×105, 1×104, 1×103, 5×102, 4×102, 3×102, 2 × 102, and 1×102 copies/μL (3 replicates of each sample), and HT-qPCR assays were performed. The minimum concentration of gene copies from the standard series was considered the qPCR limit of detection (LOD). The unit of LOD was gene copies per microliter of DNA (13). For the specificity test, quality control standards of Giardia lamblia and Cryptosporidium parvum (Waterborne™, USA) were used for the qPCR assay. For the repeatability test, plasmid standards of 1×105 and 1×104 copies/μL were used for intra- and inter-group experiments, and the average Cycle threshold (Ct) value and coefficient of variation (CV) were calculated.

      The standard plasmid (1×107 copies/μL) was diluted to six gradient concentrations of 1×106, 1×105, 1×104, 1×103, 5×102, and 1×102 copies/μL, with three replicates per concentration. RNase-free ddH2O served as a negative control. The kinetic amplification curve and PCR amplification cycle threshold (Ct value) were obtained, and a standard curve was constructed by plotting the Ct value (vertical axis) against the log10 (plasmid copy number) (horizontal axis). Method validity was verified based on the correlation coefficients, slopes, and amplification efficiencies of the standard curves for each detection target. Following development, the HT-qPCR assay was used to detect waterborne protozoa and helminths in various environmental samples.

    • Table 2 outlines the sensitivity of the HT-qPCR assay, evaluated using a gradient of positive plasmid concentrations. The results showed that all 24 detection targets were reliably detected at positive plasmid concentrations exceeding 5×102 copies/μL DNA. At concentrations of 4×102 and 3×102 copies/μL DNA, 15 and 12 targets were stably detected, respectively. When the concentration dropped below 2×102 copies/μL DNA, none of the 24 targets were consistently detected. Thus, the limit of detection for the HT-qPCR assay was established at 5×102 copies/μL DNA.

      Positive plasmid copy number (copies/μL) Ct value within group Note
      Average value Standard deviation Coefficient of variation (%)
      1×106 17.4–19.3 0.08–0.4 0.4–2.2 Stable detection of 24 targets
      1×105 20.8–23.0 0.2–0.9 1.0–4.1 Stable detection of 24 targets
      1×104 25.0–27.3 0.4–1.2 1.7–4.6 Stable detection of 24 targets
      1×103 27.9–30.7 0.5–2.6 1.5–8.6 Stable detection of 24 targets
      5×102 28.8–31.4 0.03–1.0 0.1–3.3 Stable detection of 24 targets
      4×102 ND–33.5 0.6–9.3 1.9–50.7 Stable detection of 15 out of 24 targets
      3×102 ND–32.3 0.4–8.6 1.2–37.6 Stable detection of 12 out of 24 targets
      2×102 ND–32.5 0.2–9.6 0.5–46.4 All 24 target detections are unstable
      1×102 ND–32.9 0.2–7.2 0.9–48.5 All 24 target detections are unstable
      Abbreviation: HT-qPCR=high-throughput quantitative polymerase chain reaction; Ct=Cycle threshold.

      Table 2.  Sensitivity test results of the HT−qPCR assay.

      The specificity of the method was verified using standard samples of Cryptosporidium parvum and Giardia lamblia, alongside a negative control of RNase-free water. For Cryptosporidium parvum, only the qPCR assays for Cryptosporidium spp. and Cryptosporidium parvum produced positive results with Ct values less than 35 in the amplification curves, while no amplification was observed in the other assays. Similarly, for Giardia lamblia, only the qPCR assays targeting Giardia spp. and Giardia lamblia showed positive results with Ct values below 35. No positive results were observed for any of the 24 detection targets in the negative control. To assess the repeatability of the method, intra- and inter-group experiments were performed using positive plasmid concentrations of 105 and 104 copies/μL DNA. When the plasmid concentration was 105 copies/μL DNA, the CV for intra- and inter-group experiments ranged from 1.0% to 4.1% and 1.2% to 5.5%, respectively. At 104 copies/μL DNA, the CV range for intra- and inter-group experiments was 1.7%–4.6% and 3.0%–6.4%, respectively. A CV of less than 10% confirmed the method's acceptable repeatability.

      A total of 24 standard curves for 19 protozoa, 3 helminths, and 18S rRNA and 16S rRNA genes were generated (Supplementary Table S1). The correlation coefficients (R2) ranged from 0.983 to 0.998, with amplification efficiencies between 80% and 107%, indicating reliable stability across all detected targets under the experimental conditions.

    • Table 3 presents the diagnostic performance of the HT-qPCR assay for detecting protozoa and helminths in environmental samples from drinking water sources (n=46), sludge from MWTPs (n=12), and livestock manure (n=10). In total, 17 of 22 targets were detected across all samples, with the three most prevalent being the Acanthamoeba genus (50.0%), Acanthamoeba castellanii (11.8%), and Enterocytozoon bieneusi (11.8%). The distribution of protozoa and helminths varied among the three media types. Thirteen were detected in drinking water sources, 13 in MWTP sludge, and 11 in livestock manure.

      Type No. Target Drinking water sources (DR%) MWTP sludge (DR%) Livestock manure (DR%)
      Protozoa 1 Acanthamoeba genus 54.3 58.0 20.0
      2 Acanthamoeba culbertsoni 4.3 8.3 10.0
      3 Acanthamoeba castellanii 10.9 8.3 20.0
      4 Acanthamoeba polyphaga 2.2 25.0
      5 Balantidium coli 2.2 8.3 40.0
      6 Blastocystis hominis 10.0
      7 Cryptosporidium spp. 8.7 16.7 10.0
      8 Cryptosporidium meleagridis
      9 Cryptosporidium hominis
      10 Cryptosporidium parvum 8.3
      11 Cyclospora cayetanensis 4.3 8.3 20.0
      12 Isospora belli 2.2 33.3 10.0
      13 Encephalitozoon 2.2
      14 Entamoeba histolytica 8.3
      15 Enterocytozoon bieneusi 8.7 16.7 20.0
      16 Giardia spp.
      17 Giardia lamblia 16.7
      18 Naegleria fowleri 13.1
      19 Toxoplasma gondii 10.0
      Helminths 20 Echinococcus
      21 Dracunculus medinensis 2.2 8.3 10.0
      22 Schistosoma spp.
      Note: "−"=not detectable.
      Abbreviation: MWTP=municipal wastewater treatment plant; DR=detection rates; HT-qPCR=high-throughput quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

      Table 3.  Protozoa and helminth DR in environmental samples by HT-qPCR.

      In drinking water sources, the frequently detected targets were Acanthamoeba genus, Naegleria fowleri, and Acanthamoeba castellanii, with concentrations ranging from n.d.−5.0×105, n.d.−1.5×105, and n.d.−4.7×105 gene copies/L. In MWTP sludge, the dominant targets were Acanthamoeba genus, Isospora belli, and Acanthamoeba polyphaga, with concentrations of n.d.−7.2×105, n.d.−1.2×105, and n.d.−1.1×105 gene copies/g, respectively. In livestock manure, Balantidium coli, Cyclospora cayetanensis, and Enterocytozoon bieneusi were detected most frequently, with concentrations of n.d.−9.9×105, n.d.−4.7×104, and n.d.−1.0×104 gene copies/g, respectively (Supplementary Table S2). Notably, Cryptosporidium was detected more frequently than Giardia.

      Importantly, Cryptosporidium spp., Enterocytozoon bieneusi, Cyclospora cayetanensis, Balantidium coli, and Isospora belli were simultaneously detected in drinking water sources, MWTP sludge, and livestock manure.

    • This study developed and validated an HT-qPCR assay capable of detecting 22 waterborne protozoa and helminths. This assay addresses the limitations of low throughput in existing diagnostic approaches while improving accuracy and providing a more cost-effective solution for assessing the risks of protozoa and helminths from a One Health perspective.

      Compared to current detection methods, this approach significantly enhances detection efficiency. Using four OpenArray chips in a single run on the Applied Biosystems QuantStudio 12K Flex instrument, 22 targets across up to 192 samples can be analyzed within 3 hours. This rapid data generation is advantageous for large-scale monitoring and initial screening, facilitating subsequent risk assessments.

      Infectious diseases caused by pathogenic bacteria, viruses, and parasites (e.g., protozoa and helminths) are the most prevalent health risks linked to drinking water. The primary threat to public health from waterborne microbes stems from drinking water contaminated with human and animal excreta (3). In this study, several parasites, including Cryptosporidium spp., Enterocytozoon bieneusi, and Cyclospora cayetanensis, were simultaneously detected in drinking water sources, MWTP sludge, and livestock manure. Animal breeding near the drinking water sources may be a potential source of contamination (14-15). For instance, waterborne transmission of Enterocytozoon bieneusi was reported during the 2013 “Pig Carcass Disposal Incident” in Shanghai, China, where dead pigs in the Huangpu River contributed to Enterocytozoon bieneusi contamination with animal and human genotypes, posing a threat to drinking water safety (16). The widespread existence of zoonotic E. bieneusi genotypes (D, EbpC, Type IV) in dogs and cats indicates that they are potential sources of environmental contamination and human infections (17). Thus, beyond Cryptosporidium and Giardia, which are already included in the National Standard for Drinking Water Quality of China (GB 5749-2022), monitoring the cross-media transmission of a broader range of protozoa and helminths is crucial for future public health management from a One Health perspective. Considering that RNA may reflect the viable pathogens in the samples, in the future, we will simultaneously quantify DNA and RNA from protozoa and helminths to improve the identification of viable pathogens (11).

      This study provides a valuable tool for rapid screening and source tracking of waterborne protozoa and helminths. It is primarily used for high-throughput screening to determine the prevalence of a wide range of protozoa and helminths, characterize prevalence, and provide baseline data for identifying reference pathogens. It should be noted that the current HT-qPCR method does not allow for genotype identification of the detected pathogens. While suitable for routine monitoring, further research is needed to explore the potential for animal-environment-human transmission of waterborne pathogens.

  • Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest.
  • Reference (17)

    Citation:

    Catalog

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return