-
Studies have shown significant changes in the composition of the pregnant population and pregnancy outcomes over the past decade (1–2). With the rising number of older mothers and high-risk pregnancies, the incidences of birth defects, preterm birth (PTB), and low birth weight (LBW) have also increased. Higher parity is associated with a higher incidence of these adverse pregnancy outcomes. However, the overall understanding of the reproductive characteristics of women with different parities in Beijing Municipality, China, remains limited. Therefore, a thorough analysis of the characteristics and pregnancy outcomes of women with different parities in Beijing is particularly valuable to inform better healthcare services and decision-making. This study analyzed data from 1,963,445 women with a gestational week of delivery ≥28 weeks and permanent residence in Beijing who gave birth between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2022. The results showed that as parity increased, the proportions of advanced maternal age (AMA) and non-local domicile increased, while those with higher education levels decreased. Women with ≥3 parities had a higher risk of PTB and macrosomia. Therefore, strengthening maternal healthcare for multiparous women, especially those who are AMA or non-local, is essential.
This study utilized data from birth medical certificates issued through the Beijing Maternal and Child Health Network Information System. This system is used by all midwifery institutions in Beijing to issue birth certificates, with the average annual number issued accounting for 99.5% of newborns from these institutions. Given that the hospital delivery rate in Beijing is 99.99%, the data accurately reflects the fertility status of women in Beijing (3). This study analyzed data from 1,963,445 women residing in Beijing who delivered at ≥28 weeks between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2022. Women were grouped by parity: P1 (primipara, parity=1), P2 (multipara, parity=2), and P≥3 (multipara, parity≥3). Chi-square tests and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used for data analysis, with the Bonferroni method applied for multiple comparisons using R software (version 3.6.1, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Joinpoint regression program (version 5.0.2, Statistical Research and Applications Branch, National Cancer Institute) analyzed the annual percentage change (APC) in the proportion of cesarean section (C-section), PTB, LBW, and macrosomia across parity groups. All statistical analyses used a two-sided test with a significance level of P<0.05. The study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University (Ethics Approval Numbers: 2020-KY-032-01; 2021-KY-054-01).
This study included 1,331,201 (67.8%) primiparous women and 632,244 (32.2%) multiparous women. Among multiparous women, 95.1% were P2, and 4.9% were P≥3. The average maternal age was 30.4 years, and 17.5% of women were of AMA (≥35 years).
Table 1 demonstrates that the proportion of AMA increases with parity: 9.7%, 33.3%, and 43.6% for P1, P2, and P≥3 groups, respectively. To further analyze reproductive characteristics and major pregnancy outcomes, the results were stratified by maternal age (<35 or ≥35 years). Among women younger than 35 years, the proportion with an undergraduate education was highest in the P1 and P2 groups (66.9% and 54.5%, respectively). Conversely, the P≥3 group was predominantly composed of women with a junior secondary or primary school education (44.8%). The proportion of women with non-local domicile increased with parity: 33.6%, 41.2%, and 74.5% for P1, P2, and P≥3 groups, respectively. Regarding occupation, the proportion of office workers/professional and technical personnel was highest in the P1 and P2 groups (53.8% and 43.7%, respectively), while the P≥3 group had the largest proportion of unemployed/freelance individuals (31.0%). Within the AMA stratum, the P1 and P2 groups also exhibited the highest proportion of women with undergraduate education. In the P≥3 group, the most common education level was undergraduate (36.9%), followed by junior secondary or primary school (34.2%). Similar to the younger age stratum, the proportion of women with non-local domicile increased with parity. The largest proportion of women in the AMA stratum were office workers/professional and technical personnel (54.3%, 55.7%, and 27.9% for P1, P2, and P≥3 groups, respectively). However, the proportion of unemployed/freelance individuals in the P≥3 group was also higher in this stratum (23.1%).
Variables Total Primipara Multipara P Parity=1 Parity=2 Parity≥3 Maternal age (M±SD) 30.4±4.3 29.3±4.0 32.7±4.2* 33.7±4.7*,† <0.001 AMA (n, %) 342,670 (17.5) 128,790 (9.7) 200,473 (33.3)* 13,407 (43.6)*,† <0.001 Maternal age<35 years 1,620,775 1,202,411 401,077 17,287 Education level (n, %) <0.001 Postgraduate 221,268 (14.9) 182,382 (16.8) 38,380 (9.8)* 506 (3.2)*,† Undergraduate 941,347 (63.2) 725,239 (66.9) 211,824 (54.5)* 4,284 (27.1)*,† Senior secondary school/Secondary vocational school 198,136 (13.3) 118,504 (10.9) 75,769 (19.5)* 3,863 (24.5)*,† Junior secondary school/Primary school 127,188 (8.5) 57,410 (5.3) 62,699 (16.1)* 7,079 (44.8)*,† Illiterate/semi-literate 525 (0.1) 233 (0.1) 231 (0.1)* 61 (0.4)*,† Domicile (n, %) <0.001 Local 1,030,612 (64.1) 791,323 (66.4) 234,933 (58.8)* 4,356 (25.5)*,† Non-local 577,822 (35.9) 400,267 (33.6) 164,854 (41.2)* 12,701 (74.5)*,† Residence (n, %) <0.001 Urban 647,874 (50.2) 498,890 (52.8) 143,489 (43.0)* 5,495 (43.5)* Suburban 538,899 (41.8) 377,111 (39.9) 155,598 (46.7)* 6,190 (49.1)*,† Rural 103,699 (8.0) 68,575 (7.3) 34,193 (10.3)* 931 (7.4)† Ethnicity (n, %) <0.001 Han 1,523,386 (94.2) 1,128,320 (94.1) 378,691 (94.5)* 16,375 (95.7)*,† Others 93,643 (5.8) 71,052 (5.9) 21,848 (5.5)* 743 (4.3)*,† Occupation (n, %) <0.001 Office worker/professional and technical personnel 824,732 (50.9) 646,506 (53.8) 175,242 (43.7)* 2,984 (17.3)*,† Commercial/service worker 239,170 (14.8) 165,452 (13.8) 70,598 (17.6)* 3,120 (18.1)* Agricultural workers 13,982 (0.9) 6,659 (0.5) 6,778 (1.7)* 545 (3.1)*,† Others 188,684 (11.6) 129,284 (10.7) 56,164 (14.0)* 3,236 (18.7)*,† Unemployed/freelance 183,248 (11.3) 107,163 (8.9) 70,723 (17.6)* 5,362 (31.0)*,† Student 6,567 (0.4) 5,949 (0.5) 602 (0.2)* 16 (0.1)* Unknown 164,392 (10.1) 141,398 (11.8) 20,970 (5.2)* 2,024 (11.7)† Maternal age ≥35 years (AMA) 342,670 128,790 200,473 13,407 Education level (n, %) <0.001 Postgraduate 65,383 (20.4) 25,035 (22.2) 39,205 (20.0)* 1,143 (9.2)*,† Undergraduate 185,565 (57.8) 72,268 (64.2) 108,699 (55.4)* 4,598 (36.9)*,† Senior secondary school/secondary vocational school 38,379 (11.9) 10,005 (8.9) 26,065 (13.3)* 2,309 (18.5)*,† Junior secondary school/primary school 31,487 (9.8) 5,245 (4.7) 21,974 (11.2)* 4,268 (34.2)*,† Illiterate/semi-literate 390 (0.1) 38 (0.0) 201 (0.1)* 151 (1.2)*,† Domicile (n, %) <0.001 Local 240,603 (70.5) 92,794 (72.7) 142,277 (71.0)* 5,532 (41.6)*,† Non-local 100,534 (29.5) 34,816 (27.3) 57,962 (29.0)* 7,756 (58.4)*,† Residence (n, %) <0.001 Urban 154,978 (60.3) 60,550 (68.2) 90,191 (56.5)* 4,237 (49.1)*,† Suburban 86,293 (33.5) 25,769 (29.0) 56,895 (35.6)* 3,629 (42.1)*,† Rural 15,897 (6.2) 2,492 (2.8) 12,645 (7.9)* 760 (8.8)*,† Ethnicity (n, %) <0.001 Han 319,198 (93.6) 118,958 (93.1) 187,720 (93.8)* 12,520 (94.7)*,† Others 21,899 (6.4) 8,778 (6.9) 12,417 (6.2)* 704 (5.3)*,† Occupation (n, %) <0.001 Office workers/professional and technical personnel 185,276 (54.1) 69,934 (54.3) 111,602 (55.7)* 3,740 (27.9)*,† Commercial/service workers 47,832 (14.0) 15,742 (12.2) 29,725 (14.8)* 2,365 (17.6)*,† Agricultural workers 5,344 (1.6) 560 (0.4) 4,301 (2.2)* 483 (3.6)*,† Others 41,957 (12.2) 14,600 (11.4) 24,901 (12.4)* 2,456 (18.3)*,† Unemployed/freelance 35,455 (10.3) 9,617 (7.5) 22,743 (11.3)* 3,095 (23.1)*,† Student 337 (0.1) 186 (0.1) 141 (0.1)* 10 (0.1) Unknown 26,469 (7.7) 18,151 (14.1) 7,060 (3.5)* 1,258 (9.4)*,† Abbreviation: AMA=advanced maternal age.
* Compared with Parity=1, P<0.05.
† Compared with Parity=2, P<0.05.Table 1. Comparison of basic characteristics of women of different parities in Beijing Municipality, 2013–2022.
Among women younger than 35 years, the proportion of C-section births was lowest in the primiparous group (36.9%), followed by those with three or more prior deliveries (38.7%) and the second-time delivering group (42.0%) (Table 2). Newborn outcomes also varied by parity in this age group. The incidence of PTB was highest (8.0%) among women with three or more prior deliveries and lowest (5.4%) in the second-time delivering group. The incidence of LBW was highest in the primiparous group (4.7%) and lowest (3.1%) in the second-time delivering group. Macrosomia increased with parity, with rates of 6.7%, 7.8%, and 9.3% in the primiparous, second-time delivering, and three or more prior deliveries groups, respectively. Among women of AMA, the proportion of C-section decreased as parity increased. The highest proportions of PTB and LBW were observed in the primiparous group (10.5% and 8.6%, respectively), followed by the three or more prior deliveries group (9.8% and 5.3%) and the second-time delivering group (7.5% and 4.5%). The incidence of macrosomia was highest (9.6%) in the group with three or more prior deliveries.
Variables Total Parity=1 Parity=2 Parity≥3 P Maternal age <35 years Maternal 1,620,775 1,202,411 401,077 17,287 Mode of delivery (n, %) <0.001 Vaginal delivery 1,002,496 (61.9) 759,207 (63.1) 232,690 (58.0)* 10,599 (61.3)*,† Cesarean section 618,279 (38.1) 443,204 (36.9) 168,387 (42.0)* 6,688 (38.7)*,† Newbirth 1,644,231 1,221,934 404,748 17,549 Preterm birth (n, %) 93,492 (5.7) 70,408 (5.8) 21,688 (5.4)* 1,396 (8.0)*,† <0.001 Low birth weight (n, %) 71,031 (4.3) 57,558 (4.7) 12,721 (3.1)* 752 (4.3)*,† <0.001 Macrosomia (n, %) 114,848 (7.0) 81,472 (6.7) 31,751 (7.8)* 1,625 (9.3)*,† <0.001 Maternal age ≥35 years (AMA) Maternal 342,670 128,790 200,473 13,407 Mode of delivery (n, %) <0.001 Vaginal delivery 150,310 (43.9) 51,069 (39.7) 92,446 (46.1)* 6,795 (50.7)*,† Cesarean section 192,360 (56.1) 77,721 (60.3) 108,027 (53.9)* 6,612 (49.3)*,† Newbirth 350,485 134,145 202,728 13,612 Preterm birth (n, %) 30,671 (8.8) 14,135 (10.5) 15,196 (7.5)* 1,340 (9.8)*,† <0.001 Low birth weight (n, %) 21,373 (6.1) 11,485 (8.6) 9,164 (4.5)* 724 (5.3)*,† <0.001 Macrosomia (n, %) 25,134 (7.2) 8,286 (6.2) 15,548 (7.7)* 1,300 (9.6)*,† <0.001 Abbreviation: AMA=advanced maternal age.
* Compared with Parity=1, P<0.05.
† Compared with Parity=2, P<0.05.Table 2. Major pregnancy outcomes of different parities in Beijing Municipality, 2013–2022.
Figure 1 displays the trends of major pregnancy outcomes over the past decade. Among women younger than 35 years, the C-section rate in the P1 group decreased from 43.2% in 2013 to 35.2% in 2015 (APC2013–2015=−11.8%, P<0.05), then increased to 37.3% by 2022 (APC2015–2022=2.0%, P<0.05). The P2 group showed a decline from 2013 to 2022 (APC2013–2022=−1.9%, P<0.05), while the P≥3 group experienced an increase until 2020 (APC2013–2020=4.6%, P<0.05), followed by a decrease (APC2020–2022=−4.5%, P>0.05). Similar trends were observed in the AMA group. For women younger than 35 years, the incidence of PTB rose across all parity groups from 2013 to 2022 (P1: APC2013–2015=9.4%, APC2015–2022=2.1%; P2: APC2013–2022=3.0%; P3: APC2013–2022=7.0%; all P<0.05). In the AMA group, the incidence of PTB in the P1 group fluctuated between 9.2% and 11.1% (APC2013–2016=7.1% and APC2016–2022=−1.0%, both P>0.05), while in the P2 group, it increased from 6.4% in 2013 to 8.2% in 2022 (APC2013–2022=2.8%, P<0.05). The incidence of PTB in the P≥3 group fluctuated between 7.9% and 10.0% (APC2013–2022=2.0%, P>0.05). The incidence of LBW increased in the P1, P2, and P≥3 groups among women younger than 35 years over the past decade (P1: APC2013–2022=4.3%; P2: APC2013–2022=3.6%; P3: APC2013–2022=7.0%; all P<0.05). In the AMA group, the incidence of LBW fluctuated across all parity groups (P1: APC2013–2016=9.0%, P<0.05; APC2016–2022=−0.1%, P>0.05; P2: APC2013–2017=−0.4%, P>0.05; APC2017–2022=4.2%, P<0.05; P≥3: APC2013–2022=2.9%, P<0.05). The incidence of macrosomia in the P1 group decreased from 8.1% in 2013 to 4.4% in 2022 (APC2013–2018=−5.0%, APC2018–2022=−8.9%, both P<0.05). It also declined in the P2 group from 8.8% to 6.4% (APC2013–2022=−3.9%, P<0.05). The P≥3 group initially saw an increase (APC2013–2015=13.0%, P>0.05) followed by a decrease (APC2015–2022=−6.6%, P<0.05). In the AMA group, the incidences of macrosomia decreased in all parity groups (P1: APC2013–2022=−7.0%; P2: APC2013–2022=−5.6%; P3: APC2013–2022=−5.8%, all P<0.05).
Figure 1.Trends of the proportion of C-section, PTB, LBW, and macrosomia among women of different parities in Beijing Municipality, 2013–2022. (A) The proportion of C-sections among maternal age <35 years; (B) The proportion of C-sections among maternal age ≥35 years; (C) The proportion of PTB among maternal age <35 years; (D) The proportion of PTB among maternal age ≥35 years; (E) The proportion of LBW among maternal age <35 years; (F) The proportion of LBW among maternal age ≥35 years; (G) The proportion of macrosomia among maternal age <35 years; (H) The proportion of macrosomia among maternal age ≥35 years.
Abbreviation: C-sections=cesarean section; PTB=preterm birth; LBW=low birth weight.
* Compared with Parity=1, P<0.05;
† Compared with Parity=2, P<0.05.
HTML
Citation: |