-
The overall contamination level of cold-chain food and food packaging appears to be low. Between May 5, 2020, and September 10, 2020, the Supervision Bureau of Consumer Rights and Citizen Safety Protection of the Russian Federation examined a total of 1,677 cold-chain samples, primarily consisting of vegetables (40%), meat and meat products (26%), and fruits (22%). All samples tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 (11). During November 2020 through January 2021, the Food Quality and Safety Administration’s Medical Department of the Ministry of Public Health in Thailand randomly tested 117 samples of food (mainly seafood) and food packaging (cans, cartons, etc.), with no SARS-CoV-2 detected in any samples (12).
In 2020, China Customs collected and tested 1,295,692 samples, of which 47 yielded positive results for nucleic acid (0.35/10,000), and the remaining samples tested negative (13). Furthermore, over 55.83 million swabs of frozen food-related samples were collected in China, including 31 provincial-level administrative divisions (PLADs) and the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps (XPCC). More than 20.51 million swabs were related to cold-chain food and packaging materials. Among these, 1,455 (0.26/10,000) swabs tested positive. As shown in Table 1 (14), seafood displayed the highest levels of pollution among all food types. The risk of carrying viruses is higher for outer packaging than inner packaging, and the positive sample detection ratio of imported cold-chain food exceeded that of domestic cold-chain food. Imported cold-chain foods might be a potential source for COVID-19 outbreaks related to the cold chain in China.
Date (region) Food No. of positive samples Percentage of total positive samples (%) 2020.07–2021.07
(31 PLADs
and XPCC)Seafood 753 53.86 Poultry meat 530 37.91 Other foods 115 8.23 Inner packaging material 37 3.25 Outer packaging material 1,101 96.75 Imported food and packaging 1,391 99.50 Domestic food and packaging 7 0.50 Abbreviation: SARS-CoV-2=severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; PLADs=provincial-level administrative divisions; XPCC=Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps. Table 1. Contamination of the SARS-CoV-2 variants in cold-chain food and food packaging in China.
In conclusion, by analyzing the results of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid testing of cold-chain food and food packaging both domestically and internationally, it can be demonstrated that the risk of cold-chain food contamination by SARS-CoV-2 is relatively low.
-
The persistence of SARS-CoV-2 variants on various surfaces of cold-chain food products is influenced by the specific food substrate. Table 2 demonstrates that fresh agricultural products, such as grapes and tomatoes, as well as deli products like turkey and cheese, can maintain the infectivity of SARS-CoV-2 variants for up to 21 days at 4 °C. In contrast, avocado shells, avocado pulp, and salami have been found to exhibit antiviral effects (15). Certain meats, including salmon, beef, pork, and chicken, can support the survival of SARS-CoV-2 surrogates for 30 days at both 4 °C and −20 °C (16).
Classification Food Virus Initial viral load Temperature Persistence
(day)Test method Viral load Reference Fresh agricultural product Avocado shell or pulp USA-WA1/2020, NR-52281 3.9 log PFU/mL 4 °C 7 qRT-PCR LOD (15) Grape, Tomato USA-WA1/2020, NR-52281 3.9 log PFU/mL 4 °C 21 qRT-PCR + (15) Deli Turkey, Cheese USA-WA1/2020, NR-52281 3.9 log PFU/mL 4 °C 21 qRT-PCR + (15) Salami USA-WA1/2020, NR-52281 3.9 log PFU/mL 4 °C 14 qRT-PCR LOD (15) Meat Oyster USA-WA1/2020, NR-52281 3.9 log PFU/mL 4 °C 21 qRT-PCR LOD (15) Salmon Phi6 (COVID-19 surrogates) 9.0 log PFU/mL 4 °C, −20 °C 30 Plaque assay + (16) IVCAS6.7512; NMDCN000HUI 104 TCID50/mL 4 °C 9 qRT-PCR + (17) −20 °C 20 LOD (17) Beef steak, Ground beef USA-WA1/2020, NR-52281 3.9 log PFU/mL 4 °C 14 qRT-PCR LOD (15) Beef Phi6 (COVID-19 surrogates) 9.0 log PFU/mL 4 °C, −20 °C 30 Plaque assay + (16) IVCAS 6.7512; NMDCN000HUI 104 TCID50/mL 4 °C 9 qRT-PCR + (17) −20 °C 20 LOD (17) Ground pork, Pork chop USA-WA1/2020, NR-52281 3.9 log PFU/mL 4 °C 21 qRT-PCR + (15) Pork Phi6 (COVID-19 surrogates) 9.0 log PFU/mL 4 °C, −20 °C 30 Plaque assay + (16) IVCAS 6.7512; NMDCN000HUI 104 TCID50/mL 4 °C 9 qRT-PCR + (17) −20 °C 20 LOD (17) Chicken Phi6 (COVID-19 surrogates) 9.0 log PFU/mL 4 °C, −20 °C 30 Plaque assay + (16) Material SS Alpha variant 6.20×104 PFU/mL 4 °C 10 Plaque assay LOD (18) Delta variant 1.56×104 PFU/mL 4 °C 10 LOD (18) Kraft
SARS-CoV-2 L;
SARS-CoV-2 S; 229E4.77±0.04; 4.82±0.05;
4.84±0.05 log TCID50/mL4 °C 2 TCID50 assay LOD (19) −20 °C 5 + (19) Parchment
SARS-CoV-2 L;
SARS-CoV-2 S; 229E4.77±0.04; 4.82±0.05;
4.84±0.05 log TCID50/mL4 °C 4 TCID50 assay LOD (19) −20 °C 5 + (19) LDPE
SARS-CoV-2 L;
SARS-CoV-2 S; 229E4.77±0.04; 4.82±0.00;
4.84±0.05 log TCID50/mL4 °C 5 TCID50 assay + (19) −20 °C 5 + (19) Abbreviation: SARS-CoV-2=severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; COVID-19=coronavirus disease 2019; RT-PCR=reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction;+= be detected; LOD=limit of detection; SS=stainless steel; LDPE=low-density polyethylene. Table 2. Persistence of the SARS-CoV-2 variants on cold-chain food and material surfaces.
Additionally, the persistence of SARS-CoV-2 variants on different surfaces of cold-chain food products is affected by the temperature of cold-chain transmission. One study revealed that the persistence of SARS-CoV-2 variants on frozen meat (-20 °C) is longer compared to that on freshly stored meat (4 °C) (17). Therefore, SARS-CoV-2 demonstrates a strong survival capacity under refrigerated or frozen conditions. Low-temperature environments during the storage and transportation of cold-chain food products provide favorable conditions for the survival of SARS-CoV-2.
When the cold-chain transmission is maintained and materials are consistently kept at the same temperature, the persistence of SARS-CoV-2 mutations does not increase. One study demonstrated that SARS-CoV-2 variants, specifically Alpha and Delta, can survive on stainless steel surfaces for up to 10 days at 4 °C (18). Another study observed consistent persistence levels for three distinct SARS-CoV-2 variants on the same material surfaces and at the same temperature (19). As presented in Table 2, persistence levels of the strains SARS-CoV-2L, SARS-CoV-2S, and 229E at 4 °C differ across various materials. The persistence of SARS-CoV-2 variants on porous surfaces like kraft and parchment paper is lower compared to non-porous surfaces such as low-density polyethylene. The persistence of SARS-CoV-2 variants on both kraft and parchment paper is longer at −20 °C than at 4 °C. Lower temperatures are more conducive to the survival of SARS-CoV-2. Furthermore, the persistence and infectivity of the virus can be extended in refrigerated and frozen conditions when materials are exposed to cold-chain transmission in the food industry.
-
Since the outbreak began three years ago, multiple epidemiological findings have indicated the spread of SARS-CoV-2 through imported cold-chain foods and food packaging. Existing literature has reported seven outbreaks in China linked to contact with SARS-CoV-2-contaminated cold-chain food and food packaging (Table 3) (6). In another study, viral genome sequence alignment analyses revealed that the SARS-CoV-2 strains causing six outbreaks in China were unrelated to previous local COVID-19 outbreaks. However, some of these strains exhibited high homology with circulating strains abroad, consistent with the countries of origin for imported cold-chain products from the outbreak area (20). These findings suggest that cold-chain foods and packaging can facilitate cross-border viral transmission.
Report Date Region No. of cases Source of infection Reference Literature 2020.06 Beijing 402 Imported frozen food (6) 2020.07 Dalian 135 Outer packaging of imported frozen food 2020.09 Qingdao 14 Outer packaging of imported frozen cod 2020.11 Tianjin 2 Cold-chain food environment 2020.11 Tianjin 10 Cold-chain food 2020.12 Dalian 83 Cold-chain food 2021.05 Liaoning, Anhui 43 Imported frozen cod Media 2020.12.01 Qingdao 1 - (22) 2022.05.27 Qingdao 1 - (23) 2022.05.16 Tianjin 28 Imported cold-chain food (Omicron BA.2) (24) 2022.06.30 Qingdao 13 Outer packaging of cold-chain goods (Omicron BA.2) (25) 2022.06.21 Jilin 10 - (26) 2022.08.07 Jilin 1 - (27) Abbreviation: COVID-19=coronavirus disease 2019. Table 3. COVID-19 outbreaks associated with cold-chain food and packaging.
The potential transmission of the virus from cold-chain products to humans may occur if workers handling these items do not properly wear personal protective equipment. Workers such as stevedores or wholesalers may experience higher risk for SARS-CoV-2 exposure due to their direct and frequent contact with cold-chain transported goods. For instance, during the 2020 Qingdao outbreak, the virus strain isolated from the outer packaging of imported cod was found to be a precursor of the strain infecting dock workers. The aforementioned traceability investigation and virology results imply that, under specific environmental conditions, the virus present on the surface of goods might infect high-risk populations without adequate protection, such as cold-chain workers (21). For consumers, the risk may be lower as goods are often stored and distributed in well-ventilated environments.
In recent years, sporadic reports of COVID-19 outbreaks linked to cold-chain processes have emerged in China in media reports. As indicated in Table 3, two such outbreaks were associated with the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2 variant, which was traced back to the external packaging of cold-chain food and products. In contrast, the sources of contamination in other outbreaks, primarily in coastal cities, were not identified in relation to cold-chain food and packaging materials.
-
The risk of non-foodborne SARS-CoV-2 transmission through cold-chain food and food packaging has raised concerns about food facilities as high-risk settings. The transmission risk factors in these facilities include enclosed environments, frequently touched surfaces, and difficulty maintaining physical distancing. Sobolik et al. utilized a quantitative risk assessment model to assess SARS-CoV-2 transmission in enclosed food manufacturing facilities (28). Their findings demonstrated that workers are at elevated risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection through close contact (large droplets and small aerosol particles) compared with fomite transmission (cold-chain food and food packaging) and aerosol exposure alone.
SARS-CoV-2 contamination in food and packaging primarily occurs via respiratory particle spray (droplets and aerosols) generated by workers, especially those who are latently infected or asymptomatic (29). Droplet transmission is characterized by close contact (less than 2 meters) exposure to large, virus-containing particles (greater than 100 µm diameter) that originate from coughing or sneezing and rapidly fall onto food or packaging surfaces (29). Aerosols consist of small particles that can be contacted at close distances and up to 9 meters away. Workers release aerosol particles when breathing, talking, singing, or laughing. Epidemiological studies have demonstrated viral accumulation and persistence in enclosed indoor spaces, with high levels of small aerosol particles in the air leading to food and packaging contamination (30).
Moreover, workers involved in cold-chain food processing, packaging, and transportation may spread the virus via contaminated hands, which in turn could result in the contamination of food and packaging (31). Table 4 reveals that implementing measures such as increasing physical distancing among cold-chain practitioners, wearing N95 masks, enhancing air exchange rates, and handwashing can significantly reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Virus Transmission route Simulation of situation Risk Reference SARS-CoV-2; MERS; Influenza A virus Droplet and aerosol Enclosed food manufacturing facility
(Exposure time 8 h)0.96 (28) Fomite 0.26 Aerosol exposure alone 0.05 SARS-CoV-2; MERS; Influenza A virus Aerosol, droplet, and fomite Enclosed food manufacturing
facility (PD)1 m 0.98 (28) 2 m 0.15 3 m 0.09 SARS-CoV-2; MERS; Influenza A virus Aerosol, droplet, and fomite Enclosed food manufacturing
facility (PD: 1 m)Cloth 0.47 (28) Surgical 0.35 Double mask 0.12 N95 0.01 Recombinant SARS CoV-2 variants; Murine coronavirus strain Aerosol Indoor environment 100 cm2 2.3×10−5 (34) 400 cm2 5.1×10−6 SARS-CoV-2 particles Aerosol Indoor environment 0 ACH 0.13 (35) 1 ACH 0.065 SARS-CoV-2; MERS; Influenza A virus Aerosol, droplet, and fomite Enclosed food manufacturing facility
(PD: 1 m; Double mask)2 ACH 0.04 (28) 6 ACH 0.02 SARS-CoV-2 Fomite Frozen food packaging facility The absence of interventions, exposure to packaging under cold-chain conditions <2.0×10−3 (36) No SARS-CoV-2 immunity from vaccination or prior infection; Without standard infection control interventions 1.5×10−3 Standard infection control interventions 1.2×10−3 Handwashing 3.9×10−5 Handwashing with mask-wearing 8.5×10−6 A fully vaccinated workforce, as well as handwashing and mask-wearing 1.4×10−6− 8.8×10−6 The susceptible worker with two doses of mRNA vaccine and hourly handwashing and mask-wearing 5.2×10−7 Abbreviation: SARS-CoV-2=severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; MERS=Middle East Respiratory Virus; ACH=air changes per hour; PD=physical distancing. Table 4. Risk assessment models for the transmission of the SARS-CoV-2.
Additionally, Huang et al. successfully isolated the first monkeypox virus (MPXV) strain in China (32). A qualitative risk assessment of monkeypox transmission suggests that the virus can be spread through food (bushmeat), even though it is not classified as foodborne. However, heat treatment effectively inactivates the monkeypox virus in food (33).
HTML
Persistence of SARS-CoV-2 Variants on the Surfaces of Cold-Chain Food and Materials
Cold-Chain Food and Food Packaging Causing COVID-19 Outbreaks
The Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment Model for the Transmission of SARS-CoV-2
Citation: |