-
Safe drinking water is one of the most important factors affecting health (1). China’s rural centralized water supply coverage has improved significantly since 2005. More than 9.31 million rural Water Supply Projects (WaSPs) have been constructed and the rate of central water supply directed at rural areas reached 88% by 2020 (2). Compared with the urban water supply, most of the rural WaSPs are smaller in scale, simpler in design, and poorly managed (3). This study aimed to understand the evidence provided by the Sanitary Evaluation of Rural Water Supply Projects (SERWaSP) using 160–180 typical rural WaSPs to identify potential water quality risks. The study was conducted between August and November, 2020 in 66 counties within 18 provincial-level administrative divisions (PLADs) in China. The results demonstrated that the rural water supply could be sustained and that most water sources and WaSPs were well protected. However, sanitation related to water disinfection effectiveness, water losses control, and Operations and Maintenance (O&M) management needs further improvement. Laws and regulations requiring rural WaSPs to carry out a sanitary evaluation should be established. WaSPs should use tools such as World Health Organization (WHO) Water Safety Plans to identify and control risks.
In total 178 rural WaSPs were evaluated in this study, of which 34.3% were in eastern China, 22.5% in central China, 43.3% in western China. In addition, 67.4% of samples came from surface water sources and 32.6% were from groundwater sources. Of the 178 rural WaSPs, 21.9% were built before 2005, 18.5% were built between 2005 and 2009, 27.0% were built between 2010 and 2014, and 32.6% were built after 2005. Meanwhile, 33.7% had a water supply of 3,000 m3/d or above and 66.3% had less than a 3,000 m3/d water supply. Together all 178 WaSPs provide water for about 5.6 million residents. The standardized evaluation process of each rural WaSP follows the directions and guidelines issued by National Center for Rural Water Supply Technical Guidance (NCRWSTG) from China CDC. The first procedure of SERWaSP is to organize an expert team and then do a data review, water quality assessment, and field survey. This study includes information on water source, water distribution system, water treatment process and technology, operation management, and other factors. The SERWaSP report based on the work above was done by an expert team and was returned to the evaluated WaSPs for their continued improvement. The data used in this study were collected by each WaSP expert team using the questionnaire made by NCRWSTG.
As presented in Table 1, the proportion of WaSPs with continuous water supply (i.e., 24 h × 7 day water supply) was 89.9% and the proportion of WaSPs with a guarantee probability of water supply higher than 90% was 94.3%. In addition, 91.0% of WaSPs were delineated source water protection areas as the Technical Guideline for Delineating Source Water Protection Areas requests, and 93.3% did not have pollutants in its primary protected area of drinking water source. About 92.1% of WaSPs had disinfection procedures, 90.3% of WaSPs used accurate disinfectant dosage, and 90.4% of WaSPs had sanitary management systems. Before formal supply water, 90.4% could be detected water quality by qualified organizations. All the WaSPs with water supply ≥3,000 m3/d have established a 24 h/d water supply, source water protection areas, disinfection procedures, and sanitary management systems.
Segments Risk points ≥3,000 m3/d WaSPs <3,000 m3/d WaSPs Total N Yes (%) No (%) N Yes (%) No (%) N Yes (%) No (%) Water supply Continuity* 60 60 (100.0) 0 (0.0) 118 100 (84.7) 18 (15.3) 178 160 (89.9) 18 (10.1) Guarantee† 60 58 (96.7) 2 (3.3) 118 110 (93.2) 8 (6.8) 178 168 (94.3) 10 (5.6) Water source Protection areas 60 60 (100.0) 0 (0.0) 118 102 (86.4) 16 (13.6) 178 162 (91.0) 16 (9.0) Pollutants in first-grade protection zones 60 3 (5.0) 57 (95.0) 118 9 (7.6) 109 (92.4) 178 12 (6.7) 166 (93.3) Treatment process Disinfection procedures 60 60 (100.0) 0 (0.0) 118 104 (88.1) 14 (11.9) 178 164 (92.1) 14 (7.9) Disinfection equipment used properly 56 56 (100.0) 0 (0.0) 104 80 (76.9) 24 (23.1) 160 136 (85.0) 24 (15.0) Accurate dosage of disinfectants 55 54 (98.2) 1 (1.8) 90 77 (85.6) 13 (14.4) 145 131 (90.3) 14 (9.7) Filter material seriously worn or lost 53 0 (0.0) 53 (100.0) 78 2 (2.6) 76 (97.4) 131 2 (1.5) 129 (98.5) Well protection of regulating structures 60 54 (90.0) 6 (10.0) 118 91 (77.1) 27 (22.9) 178 145 (81.5) 33 (18.5) Pipelines High leakage§ 58 28 (48.3) 30 (51.7) 111 40 (36.0) 71 (64.0) 169 68 (40.2) 101 (59.8) Long-term low disinfectant level of tap water 60 0 (0.0) 60 (100.0) 99 7 (7.1) 92 (92.9) 159 7 (4.4) 152 (95.6) Plant area Soak away toilets, pits or effluent discharges within 30 m 60 0 (0.0) 60 (100.0) 118 7 (5.9) 111 (94.1) 178 7 (3.9) 171 (96.1) Pile garbage, excrement or waste residue within 30 m 60 0 (0.0) 60 (100.0) 118 4 (3.4) 114 (96.6) 178 4 (2.2) 174 (97.8) Management Sanitary management systems 60 60 (100.0) 0 (0.0) 118 101 (85.6) 17 (14.4) 178 161 (90.4) 17 (9.6) Emergency response plan 60 52 (86.7) 8 (13.3) 118 89 (75.4) 29 (24.6) 178 141 (79.2) 37 (20.8) Cleaning, disinfection, operating and maintenance procedures 60 54 (90.0) 6 (10.0) 118 79 (66.9) 39 (33.1) 178 133 (74.7) 45 (25.3) Organized training for personnel 60 54 (90.0) 6 (10.0) 118 76 (64.4) 42 (35.6) 178 130 (73.0) 48 (27.0) Authorized hygienic license 60 49 (81.7) 11 (18.3) 118 45 (38.1) 73 (61.9) 178 94 (52.8) 84 (47.2) Water quality examination Detection by qualified organization before water-supply 60 56 (93.3) 4 (6.7) 118 105 (89.0) 13 (11.0) 178 161 (90.4) 17 (9.6) Index and frequency requirements 60 47 (78.3) 13 (21.7) 118 47 (39.8) 71 (60.2) 178 94 (52.8) 84 (47.2) Abbreviation: WaSPs=Water Supply Projects; N=number.
* Continuity: 24 hour/day water supply.
† Guarantee: guarantee probability of water supply ≥90%.
§ High leakage: leakage rate of pipes >12%.Table 1. Key points from 178 rural Water Supply Projects evaluated in 2020 in China.
The SERWaSP also showed that the pipe leakage rate in 40.2% of the WaSPs was higher than 12%. As for management of WaSPs, 20.8% did not have an emergency response plan for unsafe drinking water conditions, 25.3% had no cleaning, disinfection, operating, or maintenance procedures, and 27.0% did not have regular training for personnel. The detection index and frequency of 47.2% of WaSPs did not meet the requirements according to Technical Specification for Water Supply Projects in Towns and Villages issued by Ministry of Water Resources in 2019. Of the WaSPs with water supply <3,000 m3/d, 11.9% had no disinfection procedures, 23.1% could not use disinfection equipment properly, 14.1% could not measure disinfectants accurately, and 14.4% had not well-established their sanitary management systems.
According to the most recent water quality reports of these WaSPs provided by CDC, the qualified rates of finished water and tap water were 79.7% and 74.7%, respectively. Most qualified rates of water quality indices were higher than 90% except for microbial indices. Detailed data were shown in Table 2.
Water types Regular indices ≥3,000 m3/d WaSPs <3,000 m3/d WaSPs Total N Qualification (%) N Qualification (%) N Qualification (%) Finished water Toxicology 60 59 (98.3) 117 116 (99.1) 177 175 (98.9) Microbiology 60 56 (93.3) 117 93 (79.5) 177 149 (84.2) Physical and chemical parameters 60 56 (93.3) 117 110 (94.0) 177 166 (93.8) Disinfectants 60 59 (98.3) 117 116 (99.1) 177 175 (98.9) Total 60 52 (86.7) 117 89 (76.1) 177 141 (79.7) Tap water Toxicology 60 58 (96.7) 118 116 (98.3) 178 174 (97.8) Microbiology 60 51 (85.0) 118 87 (73.7) 178 138 (77.5) Physical and chemical parameters 60 56 (93.3) 118 111 (94.1) 178 167 (93.8) Disinfectants 60 59 (98.3) 118 117 (99.2) 178 176 (98.9) Total 60 48 (80.0) 118 85 (72.0) 178 133 (74.7) Abbreviation: WaSPs=Water Supply Projects; N=number. Table 2. Water quality of 178 rural Water Supply Projects evaluated in 2020 in China.
HTML
Citation: |