|
[1]
|
OECD. The 2007 OECD list of high production volume chemicals: No.112. 2009. https://one.oecd.org/document/ENV/JM/MONO(2009)40/en/pdf. [2024-10-8]. |
|
[2]
|
IARC. Some industrial chemical intermediates and solvents. 2020. https://publications.iarc.who.int/Book-And-Report-Series/Iarc-Monographs-On-The-Identification-Of-Carcinogenic-Hazards-To-Humans/Some-Industrial-Chemical-Intermediates-And-Solvents-2020. [2024-10-8]. |
|
[3]
|
Committee for Recommendation of Occupational Exposure Limits, Japan Society for Occupational Health et al. “Occupational Exposure Limits for ethylidene norbornene, ethyleneimine, benomyl, and 2,3-epoxypropyl methacrylate, and classifications on carcinogenicity.” Journal of occupational health vol. 60,4 (2018): 333-335. doi:10.1539/joh.2018-0137-OP |
|
[4]
|
ECHA. Occupational exposure limits substance evaluations. 2022. https://echa.europa.eu/oels-activity-list/-/substance-rev/69512/term. [2024-10-09]. |
|
[5]
|
TLV and BEI Documentation (2023 Documentation)Glycidyl methacrylate. 2022. https://www.acgih.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Glycidyl_Methacrylate.pdf |
|
[6]
|
Crump KS. A new method for determining allowable daily intakes. Fundam Appl Toxicol 1874;4(5):854 − 71. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-0590(84)90107-6CrossRef
|
|
[7]
|
EFSA Scientific Committee, More SJ, Bampidis V, Benford D, Bragard C, Halldorsson TI, et al. Guidance on the use of the benchmark dose approach in risk assessment. EFSA J 2002;20(10):e07584. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7584CrossRef
|
|
[8]
|
EFSA Scientific Committee, Hardy A, Benford D, Halldorsson T, Jeger MJ, Knutsen KH, et al. Update: use of the benchmark dose approach in risk assessment. EFSA J 2017;15(1):e04658. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4658CrossRef
|
|
[9]
|
Wang YQ. Risk safety assessment of aspartame based on benchmark dose method [dissertation]. Beijing, China: Beijing University of Chemical Technology; 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.26939/d.cnki.gbhgu.2023.001348. (In Chinese). |
|
[10]
|
Maurer LL, Alexander MS, Bachman AN, Grimm FA, Lewis RJ, North CM, et al. An interdisciplinary framework for derivation of occupational exposure limits. Front Public Health 2022;10:1038305. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1038305CrossRef
|
|
[11]
|
Matura M, Poesen N, de Moor A, Kerre S, Dooms-Goossens A. Glycidyl methacrylate and ethoxyethyl acrylate: new allergens in emulsions used to impregnate paper and textile materials. Contact Dermatitis 1995;33(2):123 − 4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1995.tb00514.xCrossRef
|
|
[12]
|
Vogel TA, Christoffers WA, Engfeldt M, Bruze M, Coenraads PJ, Schuttelaar MLA. Severe bullous allergic contact dermatitis caused by glycidyl methacrylate and other acrylates. Contact Dermatitis 2014;71(4):247 − 9. https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.12247CrossRef
|
|
[13]
|
EPA. Benchmark dose technical guidance. 2016. https://archive.epa.gov/raf/web/html/benchmarkdose.html. [2024-10-17]. |
|
[14]
|
Wheeler MW, Bailer AJ. Comparing model averaging with other model selection strategies for benchmark dose estimation. Environ Ecol Stat 2009;16(1):37 − 51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-007-0071-7CrossRef
|